Alan Johnson backs campaigning solicitor at disciplinary tribunal
Home secretary rallies to Hossack’s defence
Home secretary Alan Johnson this week came to the aid of a solicitor and leading home care campaigner who was facing a disciplinary panel.
Yvonne Hossack, who campaigns against care home closures and the removal of live-in wardens, called Mr Johnson as a defence witness at the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal in London.
The minister said she had represented his constituents ‘effectively’ in a battle against the closure of a care home in Hull, Rokeby House.
She asked him: ‘Does it concern you that your constituents may be unrepresented by me at the final hearing of their case?’
Mr Johnson said: ‘Yes, it would concern me if my constituents were unrepresented.’
Ms Hossack is accused of six breaches of rules governing solicitors’ conduct, including accessing instructions from third parties without seeking clarification of the position and providing confidential information for third parties.
Mr Johnson said he remains vehemently opposed to the closure of Rokeby House. Ms Hossack asked him whether he agreed with Hull Council’s complaint that her efforts to prevent three men being moved from that home brought her profession into disrepute.
He said: ‘I’m not aware of the code of honour that solicitors abide by, but as a constituency MP, representing my constituents, I wouldn’t agree with that.’
He agreed he had sent her emails praising her work. One said there was a large gin and tonic waiting for her on the Strangers’ Bar in the House of Commons if she came to London.
Giving evidence herself, Ms Hossack told the tribunal she did not believe there had ever been a conflict between her clients’ interests and her profession’s rules.
‘But if somebody was falling off a cliff, and they were blind and deaf, I would ignore the rule that says “keep off the grass”, in trying to grab them back,’ she continued.
She agreed with Jonathan Goodwin, for the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, that it was important for a solicitor to obtain full and accurate instructions. But she added: ‘There are clients from whom it is impossible to do that, and then I look for their best interests. Sometimes they cannot speak or be understood, then what I do is to ascertain their views and feelings and thoughts.’
The tribunal was continuing as Inside Housing went to press.
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment





Readers' comments (4)
kass | 18/09/2009 10:11 am
Dear Ms Hossack,
you would win your campaign in no time if you give just one phone call to Max Clifford telling about live-in wardens being removed, Max Clifford who represents celebrities would find in his list dozens of them with elderly parents and probably in care homes too. They would not hesitate a second to back your campaign publicly... Someone - like Joanna Lumley did for the Gurkhas, Hester Ransen, etc -would love to fight for these kind of causes... Do not hesitate... Go big!!!
Kass
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Norman Adams | 18/09/2009 12:47 pm
Kass
You make a good point, Sheltered Housing residents are on the case!
DAME JOAN BAKEWELL HANDS IN A LETTER TO NO.10
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
kass | 18/09/2009 1:48 pm
Norman Adams | Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:47 GMT...
Fantastic!... Nice to see Dame Joan into the fray... Whoooo!!!!... I can't wait for Dame Joan to give a talk to the PM.... Will the PM have a few blushes on his smoothly shaved cheeks as he did when Joanna Lumley told him off and will he say sorry to our country elderly and frail residents at question time for allowing these landlords waste valuable resources to make their lives more miserable?...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Peter | 21/09/2009 1:45 pm
Good Luck Ms Yossack, this is a nasty and vindictive allegation to malign your intergrity. I know what are you doing for those poor residents and thank god you stood your ground.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment