‘No one should go through this’
Elouise Littlewood was just 26 when she died of carbon monoxide poisoning in her new build home. Martin Hilditch talks to her parents about her death and the legacy they hope it will leave
Eighteen months ago Alan and Sally-Anne Littlewood’s world collapsed around them.
At 3pm on 27 February last year, Mrs Littlewood received a call to say that her daughter Elouise had failed to turn up for work.
The absence, without a word of explanation, was completely out of character for the 26-year-old, who was employed by Hawk Training as a tutor/assessor for children’s care, learning and development.
Her mother was so worried that she left work and dashed to Elouise’s flat in Wooldridge Close on the nearby Bedfont Lakes estate, near Hounslow. She became even more concerned when she spotted her daughter’s car outside the flat but got no answer after knocking on the door.
By now she had called her husband, who left his workplace and arrived at the flat soon after. They were then joined by the brother of Elouise’s lodger, Simon Kilby, who said Simon had not been seen by his colleagues all day - again without calling in sick. The families decided to phone the police.
When officers arrived the families gave them permission to kick open the front door. ‘They realised straight away that the chain and locks were on from the inside,’ Mr Littlewood says. ‘That’s when they sent me away.’
Mrs Littlewood simply states: ‘That was the beginning of the nightmare.’
The police made an horrific discovery. Elouise’s body was lying just outside the bathroom. Her unconscious lodger was discovered in the front room. Both had fallen victim to carbon monoxide poisoning which had leaked from the flat’s faulty boiler system. Elouise was dead. Mr Kilby survived the gas leak but remains in a coma to this day.
Neither of them would have had any reason to doubt their safety. The flat, which Elouise co-owned with housing association Notting Hill, was newly built. She had moved in just months previously and the flat had a full set of gas safety certificates.
‘I think what shocked people with this is that it was a new build,’ Mrs Littlewood says. ‘It was meant to be shiny, new and perfect.’
The aftermath
A manslaughter investigation has been launched by the police, which is ongoing. While Inside Housing makes no attempt to predict the outcome, there are still important questions to answer. Can housing providers learn from Elouise’s death and act to limit the possibility of other families going through the same pain? It is because we think the answer is ‘yes’ that Inside Housing launched its Safe as Houses campaign - which has received the Littlewoods’ backing.
The campaign seeks to change part J of the building regulations to require builders to hardwire carbon monoxide detectors into new homes with gas appliances. The reason behind the campaign is simple - to protect lives such as Elouise’s.
‘You ask anyone about Elouise and they will remember her bubbly personality and her laugh and her smile,’ Mrs Littlewood states. We are sitting in the family home in Feltham, where Elouise grew up. A large framed photo of her dominates the room.
‘She was a huge music fan,’ Mrs Littlewood adds. ‘The pair [Elouise and younger brother Matthew] used to go off to the Reading Festival together. She was the mother hen.’
Music and dance were certainly dominant features of Elouise’s life. From the age of seven she attended the Jean Inwards School of Dance, in Hanworth, Middlesex. She remained at the school as a dancer and teacher up until her death. Even when she left to study Dance and Culture at Surrey University in Guildford, the 25-mile distance proved too much and she left after a year-and-a-half. ‘She came home without the debt, she said,’ Mr Littlewood says. ‘She missed dancing really.’
When she moved into her new flat in Hounslow Elouise’s life was a whirlwind of activity. On top of the day job with Hawk Training she was dancing or teaching dance several evenings a week and at weekends. She was also doing an Open University degree in childcare, her other big passion.
Warning signs
It was because of her hectic lifestyle that no one thought anything of it when she started to complain of headaches and tiredness shortly after moving into her new flat.
‘We sent her to the optician because she had these headaches,’ Mrs Littlewood says.
‘The tiredness was just put down to her working and the dancing in the evenings,’ Mr Littlewood adds. ‘We said “Elouise, you are doing too much”. Of course, we didn’t put anything down to the flat.’
The Littlewoods have been campaigning to raise awareness of carbon monoxide since Elouise died. They want better training for doctors on the symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning and for carbon monoxide alarms to receive the same high profile as smoke detectors.
‘Unfortunately, if you go to the doctor most of the symptoms are similar to the common cold,’ Mrs Littlewood says. ‘The doctor will probably say to go home, close the windows and curl up on the sofa - and that is the worst thing you can do.’
Ongoing grief
The Littlewoods also have the spectre of a possible court case, if anyone is ever charged in connection with the death, and an inquest looming over them - 18 months after the tragedy.Some days, they both confess, it all gets too much.
‘I get quite angry because events that are hopefully coming up, like a court case, take over and she gets lost somehow,’ Mrs Littlewood states. ‘I feel like screaming and saying: “It’s about my daughter, you know”.’
In a quieter voice she asks: ‘Where are we going to get the strength to do this?’
The day after we meet is a day that will bring both pleasure and pain for the family - the wedding of Elouise’s ‘inseperable’ best friend Clare. It’s an event at which her absence will be all the more pronounced and one which they admit will be ‘difficult’ for them.
The conversation then brings another reminder of the huge impact that Elouise’s death has had on her friends as well as her family. The Littlewoods state that Clare’s sister moved into another property on the Bedfont Lakes estate the week before Elouise died.
‘Clare has never, ever visited her [sister’s home] because she just can’t go,’ Mr Littlewood states.
‘They don’t know how many lives they have ruined, really,’ Mrs Littlewood adds. She says she and her husband are both now ‘changed people - less caring really’.
‘It has changed me and not for the better at the moment,’ she says.
Mr Littlewood adds: ‘Other people’s problems become very petty, don’t they?’
The Littlewoods try to hold on to Elouise’s spirit and passion for life to keep them going. Mrs Littlewood has worn one of her daughter’s rings ever since they were allowed into the flat following her death. She has also just had a small tattoo of a butterfly and Elouise’s nickname Weeze inscribed on her wrist. ‘We both went to counselling when it happened,’ Mr Littlewood adds. ‘They would say “what would she have done and what would she be telling you to do?” It is where we get the fight from really.’
Thinking about the possibility of a court case to come Mrs Littlewood pauses and adds: ‘She would say “go get them, mum, don’t let anyone else go through this”.’
For more information, or to support Inside Housing’s campaign, see our Safe as Houses page
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment





Readers' comments (8)
kass | 09/10/2009 7:29 am
"....Thinking about the possibility of a court case to come Mrs Littlewood pauses and adds: ‘She would say “go get them, mum, don’t let anyone else go through this”.’"
Wise words, and for the sake all others like her (and us), please do all you can to follow them.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
karen | 09/10/2009 9:47 am
Absolutely think RSLs should move towards hard wiring CM monitors into all new builds. Speaking emotively rather than practically I dont think the cost would be prohibitive. Plus it makes sense in the long run to have that capability. The occurance of new builds having this kind of issue must be ridiculously small... but its still there.
I'm going to check we don't already do this, but if we don't I'll request we do in future.
RIP Elouise.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Adeoti | 10/10/2009 10:56 am
My condolences to Elouise family. I believe RSL have a responsibility to ensure properties they are making available for people to own or rent MUST be safe and they can enforce this in the contractor contracts so that all safety equipments such as fire and carbon monoxide detectors are fitted regardless of whether it is newbuild or refub properties. It is called being a responsible landlord and I would urge the TSA to include this as a pre-requisite for all build types going forward and to use their powers to ask all RSL's to install one in all their properties to avoid this tragic occurence from happening again. This is indeed a tragedy and lessons have to be taken away from this. RIP Elouise
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Paul Lerner | 31/10/2009 11:30 pm
Their campaign would do better to concentrate on prohibiting flues in voids, especially two pipe systems, which was the cause of this incident as well as others similar but some with less fatal consequences. As far as I know there has never been a death from a negative pressure fan flued boiler placed on outside wall. When I raised this with Simon Ayers and others at a meeting at Gas Safe Register HQ with members of the Association of Registered Gas Installers, they too were unable to bring to mind any such death.
When you have a blank sheet and a new design there is no earthly reason why the boiler should not be situated on an outside wall which is the norm for the vast majority of boilers.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Joe Halewood | 02/11/2009 12:01 pm
I agree that all landlords must do all they can to make all properties safe. The fact this was a new build adds to the general concern here, especially as those such as Paul above state building and gas safety knowledge that most of us dont have.
I had a couple of smoke alarms and despite the cost of carbon monoxide detectors being the same and widely available I dont have them in my home. I do now. Ive also discovered local fire services advise on these too and can even provide free ones along with smoke detectors. I dont know whether this is universal across the country or not or a local policy. Even if not they are available for less than £10.
My question is would such detectors have prevented this? If so in these days of free energy life bulbs, free smoke detectors etc, surely it is very simple and inesxpensive for all rented properties to have such detectors included by the landlord.
The banning and replacement of certain boilers will take forever and a day to achieve and so if im correct in thinking that detectors could have prevented this, why cant this be done now?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Paul Lerner | 02/11/2009 5:27 pm
There is some question mark on the reliability on the type of CO alarm commonly in use and certainly they can be poisoned by certain substances.
This is an extract from a posting on these from ARGI site taken from one manufacturer's literature.
The effectiveness of the alarm can be spoiled by many chemicals found in the normal
household. Here are a few pointers on one manufacturers literature and this is not
exhaustive. Nor do I think most householders will have this pinned to the wall in large
letters.
Quote:
Accommodation spaces should be well ventilated when household
cleaning supplies or similar contaminants are used.
The following substances can affect the sensor and may cause false
readings:
Methane, propane, iso-butane, iso-propanol, ethylene, benzene,
toluene, ethyl acetate, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxides, alcohol
based products, paints, thinners, solvents, adhesives, hair sprays,
after shaves, perfumes, and some cleaning agents.
Move the CO alarm and place in another location prior to performing
any of the following:
• Staining or stripping wood floors or furniture
• Painting
• Wall papering
• Using adhesives
Storing the unit in a plastic bag during the above projects will
protect the sensor from permanent damage
• Vacuum the CO alarm cover with a soft brush attachment
once a month to remove accumulated dust.
• Never use detergents or other solvents to clean the CO alarm.
• Avoid spraying air freshener, hair spray, paint or other........ and so it goes on.
On top of which they need replacing every 5 years minimum. Will this always be done.
On top of this in 15 or so years time when the boiler has to be replaced the ceilings will need to be removed to replace the flues or other disruption to the design needed
19
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Paul Lerner | 02/11/2009 11:13 pm
I feel I would like to add something to the post above to qualify it. There are 19 million households with gas appliances roughly. The chances of a serious CO incident are tiny but obviously very tragic. If you have a CO alarm the chances of it being faulty are quite small - I am unable to provide information on how small. As they are two independent probabilities the chances of both happening at the same time are fairly miniscule.
There is however a debate about low level exposure to carbon monoxide having long term health effects and I don't think the evidence on its prevalence is really solid.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
John Brooks | 05/11/2009 10:04 pm
I must support Paul's comments, a) because I know him personallyand he knows what he'stalking about and b) because it makes no sense at to place tenants and home-owners at GREATER risk by making them dependent on technology (ie. a CO sensor) when what is actually required is a regulatory and supervisory regime which ensures that CO risk is negligible BY DESIGN in the first place and due to proper supervision at installation and ongoing maintenance thereafter.
As Paul says, room-sealed gas appliances mounted on outside walls with properly installed flues don't kill people. Bad flue design, sloppy installation and bad / non-existent maintenance do.
CO sensors, IF they work properly, have a fresh battery and then go off, and get the appropriate response (immediate evacuation of the building!), only serve to alert people to a situation that should NEVER have arisen in the first place.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment