Lawyers say government is open to court action
Legal battle against rent cuts mooted
The government could be open to legal challenges from housing associations if it implements proposals which will lead to rent cuts.
Leading lawyers have said associations that lose out could consider taking the Communities and Local Government department to court. They have issued advice to a lender saying the department is open to challenge if it presses ahead with proposed directions to the Tenant Services Authority about how rents should be set.
The argument centres on a CLG consultation paper which states target rents - the rents associations must move towards under government rules - must drop in line with the retail price index in September if it is more than 0.5 per cent lower than the previous year.
September’s RPI, which will dictate target rent levels for the next financial year, is -1.4 per cent, resulting in a 0.9 per cent drop in target rents. Real rents change by the target rent level plus or minus £2 to bring associations within 5 per cent of target rents.
But lawyers consulted by Housing Association Funding, a vehicle which raises money in the capital markets to on-lend to housing associations, said previous papers from the CLG on rents had not compelled associations to drop their rents - instead they had been frozen or had risen.
Leading QC Rhodri Thompson told HAF’s solicitor, Ian Fagelson, senior partner at Reed Smith, that the consultation was based on a false premise - that rents could go down - and therefore the current consultation could be quashed if the government was taken to court.
The government would then have to issue a new paper which made clear that the possibility of reducing rents was a change to the current regime.
Mr Fagelson said: ‘The only thing inflation does under the current policy is operate as a cap on increases.’
David Freud, director of funding arranger Freud Lemos, said forced reduction of rents could leave housing associations in breach of their banking covenants. HAF, for example, prohibits its borrowers from reducing their rents. He added the problem could trigger a wave of loan defaults across the sector.
The TSA has previously said it might waive the requirement to lower rents if it would cause loan covenants to be breached. Mr Freud said this waiver could help HAF borrowers but would not help associations which had to put up additional cash or property as a result of a drop in value of the homes used as collateral on their loans.
He said surveyors had done the original valuations of the homes assuming that rents would never fall and would have to decrease the valuation if the government implemented its proposal.
A spokesperson for the CLG said: ‘The government made clear in the consultation on directions that a key aim of the relevant guidance was to ensure that rents remained affordable for tenants.
‘Maximum increases in rents are linked to RPI in order to take account of wider economic variables (such as wages and prices) that can go down as well as up. We proposed in the consultation paper that for 2010/11 only, if RPI was strongly negative, instead of rents falling in line with RPI we would allow providers a floor at -2 per cent.’
Lost cause
Housing associations’ fall in rental income next year, compared with original business plan
£2.5m
New Charter Housing Trust Group
£400k
Bromford Group
£1.3m
Incommunities
£1.3m
Fabrick Housing Group
£800k
Spectrum Housing Group
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment





Readers' comments (3)
karen | 16/10/2009 8:31 am
This isn't news. We've known for 10 months there was likely to be a negative RPI and thus rent reductions /Rent freeze was likely and so should have been running every contingency plan in the book.
We are reducing those non-aligned tenants by 0.9% whilst those still slowly climbing to their appropriate rent will see small increases or no change. Staff will not have a pay rise.
Impact on development... we'll have to see.
One thing I think its worth saying is that there are very few (if any) rich HAs. HAs have the ability to draw down a lot of cash at a low interest rate but the idea that they are sat on a massive pot of money is just fantasy.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Jim Paton | 17/10/2009 1:21 am
This comes after year upon year of increases way above inflation and chief executives' salaries reaching the stratosphere. Save us the handwringing over minus 0.9% plus £2, please. That's still an increase in all weekly rents below about £179.50.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Andrew | 19/10/2009 7:45 pm
I repeat my coments made on anouther article: My housing association, I suspect like many were happy earlier this year to put up rents by the maximum, based on interest rates of September 08 i.e. over 5%. When my rent was increased in June Britain was deep into the recession and public sector workers like me were facing a pay freeze. So why should tenants sympathise with HA now, when HA didn’t sympathise with tenants then.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment