All the politicians are talking about immigration - another sign that a general election is coming - and it seems that each party wants to take a harsher line than the next.
There are certainly votes out there for those who appear tough on immigration but who could not care less about its causes or what happens to immigrants, refugees and migrant workers when they reach the UK.
I wish I was on the BBC’s Question Time programme when Nick Griffin, the leader of the British National Party, appeared on it in late October. I would have said to him what we used to say decades ago: ‘We are here because you went there.’
Nick Griffin and the BNP conveniently forget, or choose to ignore, the fact that large numbers of white British folk have emigrated to other countries over the centuries and are still doing so today.
It is, of course, non-white immigration that stirs the BNP up the most, which might have had an arguable case to present to the racist section of the white working class if its leading lights had not saddled themselves with Nazi baggage.
In my opinion they are completely wrong but are entitled to express their views - providing it does not lead to violent attacks, arson and murder against people who have come to live peacefully in the UK.
Political games
Mr Griffin has decided to run for parliament as the MP for Barking, where Margaret Hodge, the former leader of a very left-wing Islington Council, is MP.
It may be tempting to play the immigration or race card during an election but it is very dangerous.
During Ms Hodge’s time in Islington, the red flag was hung on the mast of the town hall. Today she is trying to outdo the right-wing with her anti-immigration statements and is on record as saying that British families have a legitimate sense of entitlement to social housing over immigrants.
There is a myth prevailing among certain sections of the population that immigrants, refugees and migrant workers are taking social housing away from the local community and are given priority in allocations.
Nothing could be further from the truth. For example, the vast majority in the Somali community live in very cramped, overcrowded conditions or in temporary housing with severe consequences for community cohesion, children’s growth and education, not to mention the health of the very young and old.
Somalis represent the most disadvantaged, most overcrowded and most in-need community in London and in many other inner city areas. They have large households, mainly headed by women as a lot of the men have been killed or are caught up in the fighting in civil war-ravaged Somalia. Yet, as a community, they do not feature in official figures. They are subsumed in the black African category.
Extensive research, which will be launched in the new year, shows the the problem in East London is at crisis point. The report on the Somali community - No voice, little choice - will be launched on 26 January. Commissioned by Karin Housing Association, researchers Sue Lukes, Mohammed Aden and Hannah Lewis, carried out a study for 18 months and the results are so stark that the authors are calling it the ‘Somali emergency’.
Somalis are not people who can get a mortgage, rent privately or go on a 10-year waiting list. Their requirement for social housing now needs to be addressed urgently if we are not going to create another seriously disadvantaged and discriminated-against minority, which will have serious social consequences in the future.
Most other recent immigrants to the UK are those who have come as refugees from wars which have their origins in British colonial divide and rule policies; or as migrant workers coming to the UK to do jobs that local people do not want to do.
Today the largest group of refugees seeking asylum are from Iraq and Afghanistan, both countries we have invaded.
The consequence of our invasions or interventions is fear and insecurity, not to mention the destruction of the economy of those states. It is that fear that drives people out of their countries and too often into the hands of people traffickers.
Coming back to Nick Griffin and the BNP, I would also like to remind him that certain aspects of Sharia law, which he finds so objectionable in a Christian country like Britain, can be found in the Bible. While he is at it, he should turn to Exodus 22.21: ‘Thou shall neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.’
Tony Soares is a housing consultant
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment





Readers' comments (3)
Junior | 12/12/2009 11:50 am
What a funny remark to make we here because you went there?
No he didn't - was that got to do with the price of egg's. Your going to blame what happen hundred of years ago. On today's immigration. I suggest you come and live in Tower Hamlets where the Asian Community doesn't want to act in a Social Cohension way. Every Social Home that comes up go to the Asian Community the white and black family being pushed out.
I suggest you come live in Tower Hamlets where the english word is not spoken anymore and the Asian community want "Mother Tongue Classes".
The english's way of life is going down the drain. I understood when in roman do has the roman's do.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
S A LONGDEN | 26/04/2010 4:21 pm
Your article says it all. The Somali community. The Iraqui community. The trouble is that they stay that way generation after generation, harking back to the ancestral country, speaking that language as their first, wearing the costume of far off lands, eating the foods that now need importing.
My family history has English back 1,000 years, French and Austrian from the last century. Do I go around speaking French or German, wear dirndl or lederhosen or insisting on putting the Xmas tree up on Christmas Eve, no I do not.
Yet go to London and Birmingham see the third and fourth generation of foreigners who moan that we treat them as non-British. That is because they are not British, they are a little colony of foreigners. So I suggest to them: get with it, go to our schools, embrace our Christian based culture, speak English, marry into us, become 'us'. Stop being Somali, Pakistani, Iraqui, Jamaican etc. etc. and become English.
I guess that Anglo-Saxon English could remain named English, as we were here first, the rest could follow the American system and be Asian English, Black English and so forth if they wished, but otherwise indistinguishable in public life from the English in dress and manner.
In America if you want Greek culture and language you get together and have a little private school in after-hours for your children; you want non-Christian religious studies they go on Saturdays for a couple of hours. This is because they are in America where they went of their own free will for the life afforded by a system that is not the one in their original country - so why then try to change it to the one they left? Immigrants here need to think like that.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Michael Read | 27/04/2010 10:52 pm
S A Longden calls it right.
I go to France. I wouldn't dare not to speak French. It would be shameful if I expected the French to speak English. I love the French culture. I get the humour. I even relish classic Frog disdain for les roast beefs.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment