Healey attacks ‘lack of ambition’ in Boris’ London Plan
The housing minister has voiced ‘serious concerns’ over the Conservative mayor of London’s plans for the city.
On behalf of the government, John Healey has written a response to Boris Johnson’s draft London Plan. In it he claims the mayor’s ambitions for house building fall short of even the lowest estimates of demand.
‘Your own data demonstrates that London needs 18,200 affordable homes per year. Yet the plan proposes a target of just 13,200,’ he writes.
‘This represents 40 per cent of all new housing in London, down from 50 per cent under the last London Plan, and your election promise to build 50,000 affordable homes over three years has now been stretched over four years.’
Mr Healey says London needs 326,000 homes over the next decade and 180,000 of them must be affordable. He also says 80 per cent of the affordable homes should be for social rent, whereas the mayor’s plan sets this at 60 per cent.
Mr Johnson has scrapped his predecessor Ken Livingstone’s pledge that 50 per cent of all homes built should be affordable, replacing it with the 50,000 home target. This is also criticised by Mr Healey.
‘The move to a more numerical target for new affordable homes, away from a percentage, may make it more difficult for you and the Greater London Authority to use your powers to intervene on individual sites to ensure affordable housing is being built,’ he states.
Mr Healey is also critical of proposals to increase eligibility for the government’s first-time buyer scheme, Homebuy Direct, from an income of £60,000 to £74,000, saying this would spread resources more thinly.
And he voices concerns about moves to give more power to London boroughs, saying the plan is unclear on what will happen if boroughs fail to do their bit to meet wider housing needs in the capital.
He concludes: ‘The London Plan is a long term plan. It needs to show how London’s housing need will be met over the next 20 years. The scale of ambition described in the plan does not yet do that.’
Richard Blakeway, the mayor’s advisor on housing, said: ‘The mayor remains well on track to deliver more affordable homes in London than any other mayor and has already overseen the funding of over 20,000 affordable homes since he was elected despite facing some of the most severe economic conditions seen in the last century.
‘London’s house prices are almost double the national average and the mayor is committed to helping families on modest incomes in need of larger homes who are currently ignored by the government one size fits all national cap on the first-time buyer scheme.’
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment





Readers' comments (3)
Melvin Bone | 20/01/2010 9:26 am
Surely social housing in London is approaching some sort of critical mass?
Are there enough nooks and crannies to build these houses?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Len White | 20/01/2010 10:10 am
London has vast amounts of unused land, as successive studies by the GLA has shown, especially in the Thames gateway and in boroughs like Barnet. Even in west London, there are many smaller sites. Even when the recession is over, the GLA under Boris and the boroughs will not insist on sufficient affordable homes being built. As John Healey says, Boris's plan covers 20 years and has no ambition to meet Londoners' needs - and he is handing more power to the boroughs, most of which are now run by Tory NIMBYs. The next few years will be hard for anyone in housing need.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Ringo | 20/01/2010 12:20 pm
Where is this affordable housing we keep on hearing about? I am a late thirties male, earning £30k renting a tiny box one bed flat in wandsworth for £900 per month! Cannot save enough for a deposit to buy another tiny box one bed flat. The solution is? Part buy schemes where you are charged £120 per month service charges! and for what? Hoovering the communal areas once a week!! Great value for money!! Anyone else in a similar situation? Talk about a no win situation, i will keep hoping my lottery numbers come up!!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment