Thursday, 09 February 2012

Splitting the difference

In February, the Homes and Communities Agency announced fundamental changes to the model shared ownership lease, to be used by all housing associations offering homes through New Build Homebuy from 6 April 2010.

The changes make the terms of the lease clearer, and it is intended that this transparency will encourage buyers because they will be able to clearly understand what they are buying. It will also make lending on shared ownership properties more attractive. This is good news for housing associations who have invested heavily in the development of shared ownership properties. 

What are the key changes?

1. The terms under which the right of pre-emption exists has been simplified. This will benefit both buyers and lenders as it will be clearer under which circumstances the housing association will be entitled to buy the property back. The new, simpler process for exercising the right of pre-emption will help keep shared ownership units available for qualifying buyers.

2. The protection offered to the lender has now been extended to include a wider definition of what losses can be claimed under the mortgagee protection clause. The MPC or ‘compensation provisions’ benefit lenders in the event that they have to repossess the property for non-payment of the mortgage and there is a shortfall arising upon resale.

Historically, the sums recoverable by the lender have been limited to only the original loan, 12 months interest and any ‘reasonable costs’ incurred in connection with the enforcement of the charge and subsequent sale of the property. Under the new provisions the claim for interest has been extended to 18 months and any amounts paid to discharge arrears of ground rent and service charges are also recoverable. This may increase significantly the amount recoverable, in particular where interest rates are rising. This would increase the loss to housing associations on 100 per cent staircasing.

Costs of enforcing the mortgage, including the sale of the property, are capped at 3 per cent of the market value. Prior to this there was no such cap, so this provides certainty to housing associations.

The extension to the ‘loss’ definition has received praise as it will mean greater certainty for housing associations as to the level of cost recoverable by the lender. Whilst the effect of this has been to widen the definition of those losses recoverable, there is the 3 per cent limit on the amount which can ultimately be claimed.

3. The new lease dispenses with the need for a lender to conduct a valuation when exercising a claim under the MPC. The lender is not now entitled to make a claim on the MPC unless the sale price is the ‘best price reasonably obtainable’. This will inevitably speed up the sale process and reduce the administrative burden upon housing associations in approving the valuation.

4. The revised model lease contains new information to help buyers better understand the concept of a shared ownership property. This should help speed up the sales process as it should reduce the queries concerning the nature of the shared ownership lease for buyers’ solicitors.

Conclusions

The changes to the model lease provide clarity for homeowners, housing associations and lenders. It will reduce the administration involved in dealing with the MPC and valuation provisions that currently exist. This will mean that sales can be progressed quicker so that housing associations are repaid for their remaining share as early as possible.

The aim has been to strike a balance between the interests of the major stakeholders, which has largely been achieved. It has been endorsed by the Homes and Communities Agency, Council of Mortgage Lenders and the National Housing Federation, as having a positive impact and it hoped that this will increase availability of mortgages to those wishing to purchase a shared ownership property.

For more information please contact Graham Walters on 0117 917 7577. Graham manages a large and experienced team of residential property development specialists capable of managing a residential development site from acquisition to the successful sale of the plots.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Related

Articles

  • Aircrete:  A viable choice for building social housing

    4 October 2011

    Timber frame construction has enjoyed a near monopoly with social housing developers in the last decade, possibly as this building method is perceived to be quicker and cheaper than the alternatives. However, contractors are starting to look again at other options and coming up with some surprising conclusions. 

  • Lawyers warn of social networking dangers

    28/10/2011

    Landlords are being warned to set clear policies on the use of social networking sites by staff after a housing association was hit with legal action by a worker demoted for comments he made online.

  • Warning signs

    06/05/2011

    A recent spate of ‘vulnerable to deterioration’ judgements has prompted grumblings that the housing watchdog is handing out tougher rulings. So is it? The Tenant Services Authority’s Jonathan Walters reveals all

  • One step ahead

    18 March 2011

    Smart developing landlords will be able to find ways to fill the gaps left by public funding cuts

  • Stondonfield social housing development

    5 October 2011

    Stondonfield is a contractor led social housing scheme whereby Collins and Beckett found the site and put together a complete package for the end client. It took a couple of years to get the project through planning due to objections by the local parish council that the land was outside allowed development areas. Permission was finally granted due to the existence of a local housing shortage.

Resources

  • Some fuel for thought

    04/03/2011

    Companies will install solar panels for free to reduce tenants’ bills, but are rent-a-roof schemes the way forward? Kate Silverman and Alison Deighton, lawyers at TLT Solicitors, explain

  • Dealing with disputes

    15 August 2011

    The standard process for resolving construction disagreements isn’t always the most appropriate, explains Tom Wrzesien, a dispute resolution specialist at law firm TLT

  • Time bomb

    22/07/2011

    Social landlords should beware the 18-month limit to recover service charges, says Emma Duke

  • Tenant take over

    02/12/2011

    In some circumstances, residents can remove management function from their landlord, says Nicholas Kissen

  • The certainty rule

    02/12/2011

    Limits on the right to serve notice to quit on tenants with periodic tenancies could be problematic, says Andrew Dymond, barrister at Arden Chambers

Latest Jobs

  • Head of Design and Procurement

    £50,425 pa

    Closing: 2012-02-21 00:00:00

  • Development Manager

    One Housing Group is a leading provider of housing care and support across London & the South East managing over ...

    £39,200 - £46,200

    Closing: 2012-01-22 00:00:00

  • Growth & Partnerships Development Manager

    Equity Housing is a fast growing Housing Association who have undertaken a strong development plan across the North West region. ...

    Competitive

    Closing: 2012-02-17 00:00:00

  • Head of Neighbourhood Investment

    Eden Brown ( www.edenbrown.com ) are exclusively recruiting for a Head of Neighbourhood Investment for our client a Housing Association ...

    £60,094

    Closing: 2012-02-16 00:00:00

  • Sales Officer

    We are seeking a Sales Officer to manage the disposal of Metropolitan Housing Partnership's Intermediate and private sale, re sales ...

    £29274 - £29274 annum