A Chartered Institute of Housing report, commissioned by the Tenant Services Authority, has recommended that resident-led self-regulation could improve social housing and cut the need for external intervention.
Giving tenants the power to challenge their landlord is nothing new — but the extent of that power is a key focus for the new regulator. On the face of it, the more you involve customers, the greater your chances of getting it right.
As a tenant board director for the past five years, I have seen a real shift in the role of the customer. Today, not only are tenants represented on the board, but we have a ‘quality circle’ panel to monitor performance, mystery shoppers that make recommendations for improvements and a raft of new resident inspectors to carry out more detailed reviews.
Scrutiny is important and I believe housing is unique in the level of access it grants its customers. Tenants bring a perspective that puts customer needs and service delivery at the centre. But, from my experience, training and support are essential. Board excellence programmes and external training and qualifications equip us all to make better decisions, balancing customer needs with business needs.
We also need to make sure the pendulum doesn’t swing too far. I still believe a board that includes independent business people and community representatives offers the best approach and gives checks and balances backed up by a breadth of expertise.
I support the move towards more resident-led regulation, with the proviso being that residents get the right training and support. The sector has already made huge strides and the TSA should be able to have confidence in an organisation whose involved customers say ‘our landlord is doing a good job’.
Marlene Mountain is a tenant board director at Futures Housing Group
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment
Readers' comments (1)
the purple avenger | 26/03/2010 12:09 pm
"We also need to make sure the pendulum doesn’t swing too far. I still believe a board that includes independent business people and community representatives offers the best approach and gives checks and balances backed up by a breadth of expertise."
At last, a tenant making some sense. The sector is a bit resistent to the concept of tenant boards as they simply don't have the technical skills needed to run large organisations. Tenants might be happier with tenant boards in the short term but I suspect the organisations would soon run into financial, legal and viability issues which may threaten their future. This sort of balanced approach is far more digestible - but unfortunately I suspect that many of the currently enaged tenants are of the wrong stuff to adopt this approach - most I have encountered are involved becasue they are basically fed up and anti-landlord (and anti authority in general in some cases). We need to do more to engage the silent majority - I suspect there is a lot of untapped talent out there that could be really useful. I would like to see the TSA run selection and training/accreditationschemes for developing tenants who have potential in these areas - providing the selection process is vigorous and robust and does not simply accept what is currently in place. We need the right people with the right skills and potential. I dont think simply attempting to polish up existing engaged tenants will cut the mustardin the vas majority of cases. I know some will complain about this, and there are obviously exceptions to my general statement above - but I am speaking from what I have personally seen to date.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment