Housing chiefs fear coalition government
Housing bosses have voiced concerns about the potential impact of a coalition government formed by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats.
Mike Creamer, chief executive of Contour Housing Group, said the views of the two parties on social housing ‘are not exactly aligned’.
‘Much of the Lib Dem manifesto centres around the “green” housing agenda and looking at ways to bring empty homes up to the decent homes standard to get them back on the market,’ he said.
‘The Tories want to focus on right to buy and giving tenants 10 per cent equity in their home.We are faced with two inexperienced governments and the worry is that between them they could get it horribly wrong – or if you are an optimist they could get it spectacularly right.’
Discussions between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats are continuing today after the Conservatives secured the largest number of seats in last week’s general election, but failed to win an overall majority. Labour is also open to talks with the Lib Dems if negotiations with the Conservatives fail.
Gareth Swarbrick, chief executive of arm’s-length management organisation Rochdale Boroughwide Housing, said: ‘It is vital that the new government, if it is to be a Conservative/Lib Dem coalition, gives a clear indication of its likely approach on housing revenue account reform. This issue is so vital to many ALMOs and tenants that the issue cannot be allowed to drift. We need to be able to plan and make decisions now for the long-term benefit of local communities.’
Other commentators suggested the outcome of the election could lessen the immediate impact of anticipated public spending cuts.
Peter McCormack, chief executive of Derwent Living, said: ‘From a housing point of view the Conservatives won’t be able to push through cuts quite as hard and fast in a minority administration. We will face cuts, clearly, but they might not be as severe now the election has gone to a hung parliament.’
Ben de Waal, head of residential and land remediation at consultancy Davis Langdon, added: ‘The required cuts and other tough decisions are unlikely to happen as a result of inevitable compromises necessary to keep everyone happy. In the short term the existing programmes and government agencies could potentially remain unaffected but their effectiveness could be significantly constrained in the absence of a clear medium term remit from central government.’
See more general election news and analysis
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment





Readers' comments (3)
Michael Read | 10/05/2010 12:46 pm
The party's over. The punchbowl is empty. Wake up and smell the coffeee. Can you please go home now, please?
By the way, we open the books tommorow. Your hangover might last for five years but we'll make a rough reckoning of the accounts on Wednesday.
Some of you will be going into rehab. Some of you are beyond salvation. And some of you ... hey, I told you, the party's over.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Lewis | 10/05/2010 2:35 pm
The above comment represents why the Tory policy of 'care in the community' clearly had some drawbacks...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Tom Pienaar | 11/05/2010 2:31 pm
Please fill in the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors online survey (link below) if you are a housing professional with views on localist policies and the way they impact planning and housing. It takes approximately 12 minutes and your input will help to shape RICS policy. Thank you.
Link: http://communities.rics.org/connect.ti/localismconsult/groupHome
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment