‘The government won’t give a damn about us'
Pensioners like Patricia Wright fear housing benefit reforms will push them below the breadline. How can that be right, asks Isabel Hardman.

Source: Lorne Campbell
‘Last winter, it got so cold but I couldn’t afford to heat the house. I don’t want to go back to sitting on that sofa wrapped in a blanket. And I’ve got so poor I’ve had to scrape mould off my bread before making a sandwich because I can’t afford another loaf.’
These are the words of Patricia Wright, a 61-year-old pensioner living in Grimsby. Health problems have prevented Ms Wright from working since 2006 and following a spine operation in February, she has retired into poverty.
Each month, she scrapes together what she can from her pension to afford the monthly £120 gap between what the state pays her in local housing allowance and her rent. This is a lot for someone whose state pension of £132 a week has to cover her utility bills, her food and her clothing. She says that after rent she is left with £27 a week - and surviving on this is taking its toll on her health.
Her case is a far cry from the popular image of large families living in luxury at the expense of the taxpayer, but it is the reality for thousands of older people.
Pensioners make up around a third of all housing benefit claimants. And this vulnerable social group is yet to feel the bite of the government’s cuts to housing benefit announced in the emergency Budget last month. These reforms could leave thousands of them facing further hardship and even the prospect of homelessness.
From October 2011, local housing allowance will be calculated using the bottom 30 per cent of rents rather than the median currently used. It will also be linked to the consumer price index, rather than the higher retail price index which includes housing costs. The changes mean rents are likely to increase faster than benefits so that eventually it will be impossible to pay rent with local housing allowance alone, according to research by the Chartered Institute of Housing. There are also concerns that a failure to exempt pensioners from the 2.5 per cent VAT increase set for January 2011 will hit pensioners with an £8 billion bill over the next five years through every day spend.
A changing world
MPs and charities have identified several groups at risk from these cuts, including pensioners, those with disabilities and low-paid working families. Many pensioners in particular have seen areas where they have lived all their lives change, with rents in some places rising dramatically. They may have worked all their lives and paid their taxes for years, but on retiring, many have found themselves dependent on housing benefit to remain in the homes they have rented for decades.
‘Many [elderly] tenants will not have moved around for many years and the areas that might have been undesirable a long time ago may now be desirable and expensive,’ says Neil Duncan-Jordan, national officer for the National Pensioners Convention. ‘It may be a case of those people not changing, but that everything around them has changed.’
However, some pensioners on housing benefit may be safe from the effects of the cuts if they have regulated tenancies - agreements signed before 15 January 1989 which offer protection against increases in rent. This means those tenants, many of whom are elderly, will not feel the sting of a cap on housing benefit.
At a recent debate, pensions minister Steve Webb rejected MPs’ concerns about the impact the reforms would have on elderly tenants based on the assumption that many pensioners would be on regulated tenancies. Housing charity Shelter argues this is not the case. It says there are many pensioners who have signed agreements since 1989, are not on regulated tenancies and are vulnerable to the cuts.
Waiting and wondering
In reality, many pensioners don’t know how housing benefit reform will affect them. Ms Wright is one of them. She is still waiting to learn how much her LHA payments might be cut by, and is wondering whether she will be able to meet the rent in her current house. Already she can barely afford to live there. Renting her three-bedroom home costs her £105 a week, and she is adamant that she would struggle to find a cheaper deal on any one-bed flats. But her housing benefit is only £75 a week. Sometimes she has to borrow money from friends to get by. Furthermore, she has already racked up £360 of debts to her gas supplier.
Ms Wright’s financial situation is such that even a small drop in her LHA could tip her over the edge. She has tried to gain a little extra income by looking after her grandson, who had been living in care. But the state support for this was poor recompense for coping with his severe behavioural problems, and she has decided that she can no longer manage. Plus the carers’ allowance that she receives means her pension has been cut.
‘I don’t really know what I’ll do if the benefit goes down,’ she says. ‘I can’t afford to pay any more on my rent, and I’ve got a good deal on my house.
‘My landlord is one in a million, and I’m dreading what might happen if I can’t stay here. I might see if I can rent just the bedroom and the kitchen. Otherwise, what can I do? Maybe I’ll end up homeless.
‘The government won’t give a damn about us [older people], even though they can take much more than we would ever receive in their own expenses.’
Austin Mitchell, MP in Ms Wright’s local constituency of Great Grimsby, says he expects to see local councils dealing with a sharp rise in homelessness when they discover they can no longer make up the gap between their rent. He expects pensioners to be among those arriving at council homelessness offices to look for accommodation.
‘People are struggling financially and are going to be hit hard by these cuts and will no longer be able to afford their accommodation charges,’ he says. ‘The government claims that reform will cause the benefit bill to fall. It is certain to cause pain quickly when the cuts take place.’
Ministers have designed the housing benefit reforms to cut the rising bill and encourage as many claimants as possible to return to work, but these cuts leave pensioners at the sharp end, says Mr Duncan-Jordan.
‘The problem is that they are on a very low income,’ he says. ‘The basic state pension in this country is £96.67 a week, so housing benefit is there to recognise that the state pension is pathetically inadequate. The examples used by the government of people getting hundreds of thousands of pounds in benefit might match a handful of cases, but it just does not match the experience of older people.’
It appears pensioners are the forgotten face of housing benefit reform. While there is much talk of the need to ease people of working age off benefit dependency and into paid employment, there is little mention of those who have retired, who cannot fill the sudden gap in income with a job.
‘Thousands of pensioners will be affected by these changes,’ says Shelter chief executive Campbell Robb. ‘Their housing benefit and pension is all they have, so they won’t have the option of increasing their income to pay any shortfalls.’
Forced out
Shelter is also concerned that the drop in LHA rates paid to private tenants will mean elderly people have to move away from the support networks they rely on. ‘This will impact on many aspects of their lives and make something as fundamental as food shopping a real difficulty,’ says Mr Robb.
Labour MP Glenda Jackson agrees: ‘These plans could tear families apart. Pensioners are going to lose their homes.’ At the adjournment debate on housing benefit a few weeks ago, the MP for Hampstead and Kilburn also claimed the reforms could take society back to the days of the 19th century Poor Law - the pre-welfare state poverty relief legislation.
‘If [pensioners’] homes are taken away, where will they live?’ she asked. ‘Many of them do not have families who can house them. Are we going to put them in a residential home? Are we going back to the good old days of the Poor Law, where a husband and wife could be separated and put in separate buildings?’
For Ms Wright, the options if she does have to move are limited. The situation in her extended family is extremely difficult, and she is fiercely protective of her independence. ‘Why should they make me move in with someone or go into a home when I can look after myself?’ she asks.
‘It’s not fair that David Cameron is picking on the poor and not helping people like myself that really need support.’
Cases like Ms Wright’s are what austerity will really look like when the benefit cuts start to hit home. This is why Inside Housing’s What’s the Benefit? campaign needs your support. We are calling for fairer reforms to the housing benefit bill which we can present to the government so that Ms Wright and other pensioners can at least have a chance to live above the breadline. Without having to remove the mould first, that is.
Our demands
A parliamentary inquiry into the potential impact of the changes
To get 500 people to sign a petition voicing concern about the changes and supporting alternative action to bring housing benefit under control
To work with our readers to devise an alternative solution to curbing the housing benefit bill that will be presented to the government ahead of the October comprehensive spending review
How to get involved
- Sign our What’s the Benefit petition
- Send your suggestions for alternative, fairer benefit reforms to editorial@insidehousing.co.uk
- Join our backers by emailing a picture of yourself and a line explaining why you support the campaign
- Tweet about the campaign using the hashtag #housingbenefit
- Visit our campaign page for up-to-date news and more information about how to support the campaign through social networking sites
View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment





Readers' comments (78)
Mr P | 30/07/2010 11:18 am
"Renting her three-bedroom home costs her £105 a week, and she is adamant that she would struggle to find a cheaper deal on any one-bed flats"
Check out the link below Patricia, there's a few 1 bed flats in Grimsby that your HB would cover.
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to-rent/Grimsby.html?sortByPriceDescending=false&minBedrooms=1&maxBedrooms=1
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Joe Halewood | 30/07/2010 11:41 am
Mr P -
Can you advise how much each of these PSLs or letting agents would charge for a tenancy fee?
Can you further advise the cost and source of the deposit needed will come from?
Can you also advise on where the tenant gets the money for her removal costs?
Can you then repeat this for when the 30th percentile drops to £70 pw from £75pw?
Can you also advise which of the 3 properties in the whole of grimsby the tenant can pay for with her £70pw in your link?
Sorry, may I correct myself there - the 1 flat that is on the ground floor that is available (the tenant has a spine injury hence upper flloors would be medically unsuitable!)
Can you also advise on how many other prospective tenants in Grimsby the tenant will be competing against for this one flat?
I agree she shouldnt moan about the 'lovely' pink bathroom suite there... but come on!!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Joe Halewood | 30/07/2010 11:49 am
Oh what about her upfront payments to the gas company? The cost Mr P?
Will the tenant incur higher travel costs in getting to hospital for treatment of her spine injury? Damn a spine injury that means she will have to pay someone to move her belogings too doesnt it? She cant lift her belongings herself can she?
Damn if only there was a nice local social housing sheltered scheme where she could go eh?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mr P | 30/07/2010 12:00 pm
Don't get your knickers in a twist Joe. I'm just giving some friendly advice.
All of the costs you mentioned are one offs that will be more than covered by the saving made on rent and Mrs Wrights gas bill.
There are 6 available flats which Mrs Wrights £75 HB would cover on the 2 minute check i did on rightmove, not 1. 5 of these are at £70 per week so she would be fine when the HB limit is dropped.
Incidentally, if she needs to live on the ground floor what does she do about going to bed every night?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mr P | 30/07/2010 12:14 pm
What is the answer then Joe?
Leave things as they are with Mrs Wright struggling with everyday life?
I thought that resolving the issue which is the obvious cause of the problem would lead to an improved quality of life for Mrs Wright. All that's happening is that Mrs Wright is paying a premium to live in a house which is too large for her.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Sidney Webb | 30/07/2010 12:27 pm
P taken and P nailed to the mast - well done Joe
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mr P | 30/07/2010 2:04 pm
If you say so PSR.
It's a shame that Joe couldn't have thought of anything that would have helped Mrs Wright though.
Looks like she'll be confined to the ground floor of the house she's struggling to pay for. (if Joes medical assessment is accurate!)
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30/07/2010 2:50 pm
Oh, the bleedin stumps ... which PSR and our Joe are desperate to exploit.
Now boys apply your meticulous calibrations to the Somali in the Kensington mansion at £2000 a week.
Patricia Wright suffers cos our Somali doesn't like living in Kensal Green with people like Patricia Wright.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Sidney Webb | 30/07/2010 3:16 pm
Hell of a commute from Grimsby to Kensington.
Can anyone tell me if the family in the Kensington house insisted on that property or whether the local authority has rented the house as a result of not having any family sized homes themselves. If it is the latter then surely had they asked the private landlord/owner to moderate the rent the socially minded soul would, I'm sure, have come in at around £400 per week.
Is it just Somalis you object to or anyone who is not you?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
victoria howard | 30/07/2010 3:30 pm
MR P you are correct in saying that this lady does not need to live in a 3 bed house, and also that if she cannot manage the stairs in a flat, then how can she manage the stairs in a house. It is obvious that what she has to live on is far too low, but it is also obvious that 1 person shouldn't be handed a 3 bedroom house. These sorts of things do need to be adjusted so that a family that really needs a 3 bed house, which could be as many as 5 people, if they have children (children do not need a room each), can get access to this. That is common sense.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment