Why haven’t record low interest rates generated more of a boom in the housing market than the one that’s now hit the buffers?
The latest Nationwide index published this morning shows that prices fell 0.9% in August following a 0.5% fall in July. Until now it has reported markedly more buoyant results than the rival Halifax index.
Comparing the Nationwide’s last three months with the previous three, prices flat-lined and anything other than a sizeable increase in September will see that measure enter negative territory for the first time since May 2009. The annual rate fell to 3.9% from 6.6% a month and that too could go negative within the next few months on current trends.
But all this is happening at a time when home owners are substantially better off. In September 2008, the average interest rate for a variable rate mortgage was 5.9%. It’s now just 2.8%.
That means anyone taking out a 75% mortgage on a house priced at the Nationwide’s current average of £166,507 is now paying £579 a month rather than £796 a month. They are £217 a month or £2,604 better off. (Compare that to the £600 a year cuts facing tenants on housing benefit).
Nationwide says the falls are due to the unwinding of the supply-demand imbalance that drove up prices last year. Rising prices encouraged sellers back into the market and buyers have more bargaining power. The falls are a correction in a market that had got ahead of the recovery in the wider economy.
Another big reason is the sclerosis in the mortgage market and lack of entrants. First-time buyers are finding it virtually impossible to get a mortgage without family help with a deposit and Bank of England figures earlier this week showed a slump in mortgage approvals.
A third is fear of the austerity budget and possible double-dip recession to come. There are better ways to use that £2,604 a year than to buy a more expensive house that may fall in value.
But underlying it all in my view is that house prices are still fundamentally over-valued against incomes. That injection of cash into the pockets of home owners concealed it for a while but now it’s reasserting itself.
That does not mean that prices are about to fall as they did in 2008 but it does mean that any increase in interest rates will have a huge impact. It may not happen until well into 2011, as Nationwide believes, but sooner or later it will.
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment






Readers' comments (4)
Melvin Bone | 02/09/2010 10:56 am
'unwinding of the supply-demand imbalance' &
'sclerosis in the mortgage market'.
Have you had a bet with someone to get these phrases in your 'article'?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Sidney Webb | 02/09/2010 1:23 pm
Produces column inches, yes, contributes meaning, no, just more drivel from the financial sector.
Has anyone else noticed that the same people who were falling over each other only four months ago calling for massive budget cuts to cure the recession are now saying that the proposed massive budget cuts risk causing a return to recession.
It appears that the financial community, being so concentrated on short term gain, have completely forgotton which horse they were backing and why!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 02/09/2010 4:26 pm
Does have meaning - if you are a housebuilder who bought land having factored in a 25% profit margin this is now only 21.4% and falling, therefore the prognosis for delivery of both new market and affordable housing is not good.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Sidney Webb | 02/09/2010 4:33 pm
Then damn well build those houses now before the profits fall lower would seem the way forward, and the way forwards for the economy, meaning that profits can be sustained. The landbanking is adding nothing but asset worth to balance sheets. If the houses had been built previously the profits, higher or lower, would now be in the bank.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment