Monday, 24 November 2014

Private Members Bill: Replacement of the Dangerous Dogs Act

Posted in: Discussion | Policy forum

10/08/2010 7:35 am

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

Anonymous

Anonymous

10/08/2010 9:37 am

Laws are useless unless they are enforced. My local council has now decided to scrap dog warden posts due to budget cuts. But then they never visited our area anyway. Similarly our local police will not apply for ASBO's because they say they dont have the resources to enforce them. The will of Parliament is being quietly undone.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

john williams

john williams

Posts: 629

10/08/2010 10:21 am

I agree with anonymous above.   The police have already got immense powers as it is.  However they have also grown addept at findingthe best excuses not to use them to protect the public.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Chris Webb

Chris Webb

Location: South East England
Posts: 224

10/08/2010 4:21 pm

Was the original dangerous dogs act really way back in 1871?

Can anyone remember when dog licensing was abandoned?

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Owen Hart

Owen Hart

Posts: 104

10/08/2010 11:00 pm

Police will act if it's easy to do so and if arrests result in convictions as convictions turn into brownie points for promotion and pay rises. Try to think like a member of the Police Federation as that's how they think. The DDA is notoriously difficult to get convictions under and is widely acknowledged as a flawed piece of legislation rushed through by the Major government as a result of the usual DM hysteria. It targets specific breeds of dog rather than the owners. Always a mistake. It's like banning racing bikes because some racing bike owners ride through red lights. Reform is long overdue,..

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

john williams

john williams

Posts: 629

11/08/2010 8:38 am

ILAG

so you are saying that the main reason the police have noty been  effective  on antisocial issues is because even if the police have evidence of antisocial activity, they will not get convictions?

Who is protecting the the victims then? 

That's what happened in Fiona Pilkington case and millions of other cases.  It looks to me like the police, landlords and courts are all passing the buck from one to another leaving the victims they are supposedto protect to suffer even more and longer.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Chris

Chris

Location: Progressive Solutions Required
Posts: 379

11/08/2010 9:32 pm

Nothing will happen as a result of this.

The Bill will no doubt be passed because it will make good headlines, appear to be a government taking action, and be lapped up by the governments supporters who are growing more desperate by the day to be convinced that they were perhaps correct to want this government in the first place.

The outcome will be little or no change, although the RSPCA etc will maybe have a little more responsibility, unfunded of course. The cuts in the police force, and in the courts will ensure that legal enforcement is not improved. The proposed dismantling of all things public sector will mean that there will not be any local government action or dog wardens to call on. So unless Joe Public is going to enforce the law, nothing will happen.

The devilish side of me argues - what about individualism, but I'll allow the individualists to join a call for joint action in the interests of the common good when it suits them. There, I can have double standards too.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Owen Hart

Owen Hart

Posts: 104

12/08/2010 0:55 am

kass - yes, nobody, and that's right, respectively.

CW - oooh, you are cynical!!

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Chris

Chris

Location: Progressive Solutions Required
Posts: 379

12/08/2010 9:53 am

Cynical - often; Realistic most of the time though!

Inappropriately humoured - too often (humbly apologise to so many)

Prone to blood rushes - hence the previous

Angered by false facts and blatent tribalism - always

Correct - most of the time

So, there are my buttons for all who care to push, but note I'm rarely bothered by lables applied but often engaged by factual opinion and argument.

Meanwhile - the dog issue really will not be resolved regardless of the proposals for their to be a socialist style action to control owners. The reason is that the cultural deformation of our society over successive governments will first need the will to reverse, and then secondly the action to cause, and finally the time to have the effect.

Whilst we continue to labour under the individual is paramount ideology then social breakdown and ills will continue. For instance, how can you have anti-social behaviour when there is no society to be against? The reigning in of individual interest and the comprimise towards social values is required across all social and economic spheres before any single issue action can have a positive and lasting outcome.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

12/08/2010 11:38 am

That's all we need - a bar-room bore with delusions of being a philosopher.

It's the dogs, stupid.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Chris

Chris

Location: Progressive Solutions Required
Posts: 379

12/08/2010 12:04 pm

Wonderful level of argument Anonymous - everyone now understands your points so well made, and your ability to perceive how matters may be interlinked is truly predictable.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • posted Anonymously, 22/10/2014 12:55 pm in HOUSING ASSOCIATION TENANT FAILURE

    Is it justme or do other people get irrationally annoyed when people post new topics on a thread that has been dead for years.

  • From Abe Foolish, 19/10/2014 6:17 pm in Queen Mary University of London ,Disgrace

    Just to say that the QMUL Residential Services team have gone down in my own estimate . I didn't think such things happened but now I can believe anything. My best wishes to your lodger for having the courage to come out with this revelation which can't be very pleasant considering he is a student of QMUL .

  • From Ansa Celestine, 22/05/2014 11:27 pm in Help With Disrepairs

    I spoke to someone the other day who very bravely withheld their rent and put it in a seperate account.  The housing association took them to court but then they told the judge that they did have the money, they are just desperate to be heard as they are not getting any help.  The judge ordered the housing association to do the repairs and the tenant to pay the rent.  Apparently now when the person phones the housing association they jump to do the repairs.  I am not as brave as that person, but I do understand the frustration ...

  • From Mia Woody, 07/04/2014 2:19 pm in Discussion forums re housing especially social housing

    rollonfriday.co.uk

  • From Mr Webb, 02/10/2013 4:32 pm in are housing benefit under occupancy rules a threat to vulnerable people?

    The vulnerable do appear to have been crucified by the welfare reforms. No doubt though the policy makers will claim it was not their fault and find some other group to blame it on.

  • posted Anonymously, 15/09/2013 9:07 pm in HCA Framework Document

    i know of a social rent property which was vacant one day, new tennant ( via nomination from homeless) informed 3 days later, no mention of " affordable rent" in offer letter. Rent has increased by over 300.00 per month.  Now that certainly is not Affordable..

  • From raymond hunter, 13/08/2013 7:51 pm in mutual exchange refusal

    had alot of questions but you guys got all the answers thanks.

  • From tony mcq, 06/07/2013 3:45 pm in L&Q Structural problems floor shakes when neighbours walk about

    PLEASE  LET  ME  KNOW  IF  YOU  WANT  TO  SEE  ME  OR  CONTACT  ME-----ABOUT   YOUR  HOUSING  DISTURBANCE--AND  STRUC TUAL   PROBLEMSS  IM  HAVING  SAME  PROBLEMS---WITH   L Q---IS  MY LANDLORD  TOO------TONY----

  • From Jason Matthews, 25/05/2013 1:11 pm in Bedroom tax and lack of smaller properties to move into

    thanks Anna - just what I needed

  • From alan brunwin, 03/08/2012 4:13 pm in Yobs with Dogs: Another "needs" based allocation outcome

    I live in shelterd housing and its a life of hell. we have a Rottweiler dog housed with two old people in a one bed no garden first floor flat next door to us 5 feet away, and its made our life hell. Kepts us awake night day with them taking the big dog down the staircase banging doors. The Housing assosiation are a law unto themselves do what they like to you. Even told us to move out if we don't like it. shame on them.The dog comes first.

IH Subscription