Saturday, 01 November 2014

£95,000-a-year benefits family of 12 re-homed in a £1,000-a-week house

Posted in: Discussion | Policy forum

05/09/2010 5:26 pm

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

Junior

Junior

Posts: 649

05/09/2010 9:48 pm

I am  in total agreed with one hundred per cent - cut it off after the second child .

I love it when they also come out with well I am in a two bedroom property and now my mum and dad and new wife and ex amount of children now live in the property and we want a big property.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

05/09/2010 10:39 pm

Anyone would think that the Daily Mail is the only news publication in the land - how about: http://www.iwca-islington.org.uk/new/article/31

Anyone we know?

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Posts: 104

06/09/2010 0:16 am

No. Try again. Sticking to topic, can any lefties really come up with one decent reason why child benefit should be unrestricted and unlimited given the global population problem?

http://www.optimumpopulation.org/releases/opt.release08Jul10.htm

"Singapore is the world’s most overpopulated state, followed by Israel and Kuwait, according to a new league table ranking countries by their degree of overpopulation. The UK is 17th in the table....A UK citizen, for example, has an average ecological footprint of 6.12 global hectares but because of the size of the population, their “share” of national biocapacity is only 1.58 global hectares. This gives the UK a self-sufficiency rating of 25.8 per cent – the proportion of its footprint it derives from its own resources –and a corresponding dependency rating of 74.2 per cent. If it had to rely on its own biocapacity, the UK could therefore sustain only a quarter of its population – around 15 million – and, at current consumption levels, is “overpopulated” by more than 45 million"

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

06/09/2010 7:13 am

But Owen Hart was a member of ILAG, with some very dubious views and a productive role within a quango. Just the sort of person to obsess about tenants and all things tenant, without ever a positve refelection nor balance. How can you not know him?

One good reason - child benefit ensures that the basic nurishment for a child can be afforded, reducing infant death and maximising the health of children.

Second good reason - children should not suffer punishment because of the actions of their parents.

Third good reason - until the economic imbalance insociety is addressed, i.e. the cause, then the solution that is child benefit must remain.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Kev Dupree

Kev Dupree

Posts: 25

06/09/2010 10:39 am

ILAG you must be massivly naive to believe everything you read in the papers...especially such as obviously right wing and bias publication which is so widely laughed at as sensationalist and alarmmist, playing on people's pre-existing prejudices.

You already know this, but as the DM fits your angry "out with the forigener" chant you are happy to ignore its ridiculously obvious shortcomings. As long as it brings you some confort whilst trapped in you flat.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

kass

kass

Posts: 629

06/09/2010 10:58 am

ILAG, How many familIEs in a single household of 12 are there in the land?

And how many of them are foreigners?

And how many of them get all this money?

Maybe 1 or 2...

while the multimillion daily waste of councils goes on and growing by the second you worry about this family?

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sidney Webb

Sidney Webb

Location: South East England
Posts: 224

06/09/2010 11:09 am

The likely suspects this time were not BME, so would fall under the 'Feral Tenant' description in 'ILAG speak'. Kev is spot on that ILAG reads only what supports his own world view.

It is notable the extent of condemnation and hatred held for fellow human beings, that seems to rest behind so many of ILAG's contributions. Are these really the views of the people of Islington, of leaseholders, of Britain? Do we live in a sceptred British Isle or sceptic Ilag Isle?

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Kev Dupree

Kev Dupree

Posts: 25

06/09/2010 11:10 am

I have just read ILAGs post with amazement.

Apparently the UKs population needs to be 15 million to be sustainable.

The UKs population in 1850 was 15 million.

I don't even know where to start with this one.

Firstly i would like to thank ILAG for his post, a much needed laugh on a Monday morning.

Secondly thanks for proving you have absolutley no understanding of populations and demographics and the optimum pop trust lol has no grasp of reality.

Also i love the random examples, obviously cut and pasted from various right wing sites such as the opt but ILAG you have massivley discredited yourself yet again with such ridiculous figures that if you has any real understanding you would realise how stupid they sound.

How do you propose the population is reduced by 75% then? Ridiculous. I would love you to expand on your theory of how the UK can only sustain a population we had 160 years ago? Have you forgotten all forigen trade, new technology and farming practices, GM crops... the list goes on.

Thanks again, you have discredited yourself in such a way that would never have been possible without you supplying such stupid figures.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

06/09/2010 11:22 am

There is remarkable similarity between the posts of Progressive Solutions Required, Kev Dupree and the catechism according to Socialist Worker Party.

Most readers would need explanation about the SWP since its never got any electoral representation, has now given up on obtaining that representation - after abandoning infiltration of the Labour party - and meets in a tent at the Hendon turn-off of the North Circular on the third Sunday of every month.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Kev Dupree

Kev Dupree

Posts: 25

06/09/2010 11:28 am

Thanks for avoiding the point yet again ILAG, i'll repeat the question:

How can the UK can only sustain a population we had 160 years ago?

I'll repeat the figures just to make you understand.

 You state the UK can sustain a population of 15 million.

The national statistics website states the UKs population in 1850 was 15 million, yes thats 160 years ago! How have we survived ILAG, oh yes, you are talking nonsense yet again.

Tom, can you confirm PSR and myslef are different people so ILAG has to face the ridiculous statements he has made?

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Kev Dupree

Kev Dupree

Posts: 25

06/09/2010 11:31 am

I'd like to add the "remarkable similarity" is likley due to the fact you post such ridiculous views and laughable facts, i expect mine and PSRs views are representative of the vast majority.

Also thanks for the SWP explination, i haven't heard of them before, except when you try and hurl "lefty" insults. I'm still unsure who/what they are but don't really care.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Inside Housing staff post

Tom Lloyd

Tom Lloyd

Posts: 148

06/09/2010 11:48 am

If it helps the debate get back on track, I'm happy to confirm that Kev and PSR are different people.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

06/09/2010 12:52 pm

Listen Kev NotaSpart the source for ILAG's contribution was a site called optimumpopulation.org. or something similar.

The source therefore wasn't ILAG.  The views therefore were not ILAG's. Gettit.

It might help you to understand that  one of the drivers of modern economics is the idea of scarce resources and some of the early thinkers - Malthus and Keynes - thought that population was a factor in the equation (Well, stone me, I'd have never thought of that).

Now where was I?  Ah yes, here you roll out your intellectual heff.

"I'd like to add the "remarkable similarity" is likley due to the fact you post such ridiculous views and laughable facts, i expect mine and PSRs views are representative of the vast majority.

Also thanks for the SWP explination, i haven't heard of them before, except when you try and hurl "lefty" insults. I'm still unsure who/what they are but don't really care."

There's the small matter of May's election, not forgetting Blair's book, which have comprehensively put your views in a minority of a minority.

As my mom used to say: "Go and read a book".

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Kev Dupree

Kev Dupree

Posts: 25

06/09/2010 1:10 pm

What a pathetically weak response:

"the source for ILAG's contribution was a site called optimumpopulation.org. or something similar. The source therefore wasn't ILAG.  The views therefore were not ILAG's. Gettit."

And there was me thinking that if you post a quote from another source then you agree with it. Of course he didnt come up with it but he is obviously advocting it as correct.

"There's the small matter of May's election, not forgetting Blair's book, which have comprehensively put your views in a minority of a minority."

Where has this come from? i asked ILAG to state if he still agrees that the UK is overpopulated by 45 million and this is the response i get? Sounds a little desperate to me, also i voter tory so i don't really see your point.

Ridiculous figures, ridiculous viewpoint, no-one except an anon poster agrees, several posters disagree.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Kev Dupree

Kev Dupree

Posts: 25

06/09/2010 1:15 pm

"It might help you to understand that  one of the drivers of modern economics is the idea of scarce resources and some of the early thinkers - Malthus and Keynes - thought that population was a factor in the equation"

Thanks for "helping me understand" by simply naming two famous economists. You don't seem to have made a point. Obviously population is a major factor in economics but my point is to state that the UK is overpopulated by 45million and needs to return to the population we had in 1850 is so naiive it is amazing.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Chris

Chris

Location: Progressive Solutions Required
Posts: 379

06/09/2010 1:30 pm

Would that be the same Malthus who was so enlightened as to suggest that the poor should be corralled in ghettos, refused any poor relief or healthcare, and denied access to betterment as a means of population control. His argument that the poor were a drain on the ruling classes were as ludicrous as his solutions.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

06/09/2010 1:44 pm

 

Listen Kev NotaSpart and NotaBrain get yourself over the optimumpopulation website and take a look.

For your information, one of the world's saints, Sir David Attenborough, is a patron.

Now tell readers here you think Sir David is a numpty for the same reason you slagged off ILAG.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

06/09/2010 1:50 pm

But it would be the same John Maynard Keynes who you quote approvingly on every occasion for wanting to spend taxpayers' money at every opportunity who was also an enthusiastic eugenicist and had some nasty racist views to boot.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Chris

Chris

Location: Progressive Solutions Required
Posts: 379

06/09/2010 2:02 pm

Please do come back with the date, time and posting subject where I quoted Keynes, approvingly or otherwise.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sidney Webb

Sidney Webb

Location: South East England
Posts: 224

06/09/2010 3:27 pm

"tell readers here you think Sir David is a numpty"

The famous and the mighty can not hold extreme views - tell that to the abdicated Uncle of our current Queen, or her Husband come to mention it.

The current governor of California and even the Pope have been known to murmour the odd concering voice.

Even our own Cameron, with his hoodies, and Brown, with his Bigots, have qualified in the numpty category.

What make Attenborough so special other than he has fronted the BBC's nature programmes for-ever. Even Mr Mosley had his nice days, I'm sure - and he would have kept his views under wraps had he been a media front man as Sir David is, otherwise how would he have made a living.

What a stupid position to argue from.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |

Rate this topic (3 average user rating)

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • posted Anonymously, 22/10/2014 12:55 pm in HOUSING ASSOCIATION TENANT FAILURE

    Is it justme or do other people get irrationally annoyed when people post new topics on a thread that has been dead for years.

  • From Abe Foolish, 19/10/2014 6:17 pm in Queen Mary University of London ,Disgrace

    Just to say that the QMUL Residential Services team have gone down in my own estimate . I didn't think such things happened but now I can believe anything. My best wishes to your lodger for having the courage to come out with this revelation which can't be very pleasant considering he is a student of QMUL .

  • From Ansa Celestine, 22/05/2014 11:27 pm in Help With Disrepairs

    I spoke to someone the other day who very bravely withheld their rent and put it in a seperate account.  The housing association took them to court but then they told the judge that they did have the money, they are just desperate to be heard as they are not getting any help.  The judge ordered the housing association to do the repairs and the tenant to pay the rent.  Apparently now when the person phones the housing association they jump to do the repairs.  I am not as brave as that person, but I do understand the frustration ...

  • From Mia Woody, 07/04/2014 2:19 pm in Discussion forums re housing especially social housing

    rollonfriday.co.uk

  • From Mr Webb, 02/10/2013 4:32 pm in are housing benefit under occupancy rules a threat to vulnerable people?

    The vulnerable do appear to have been crucified by the welfare reforms. No doubt though the policy makers will claim it was not their fault and find some other group to blame it on.

  • posted Anonymously, 15/09/2013 9:07 pm in HCA Framework Document

    i know of a social rent property which was vacant one day, new tennant ( via nomination from homeless) informed 3 days later, no mention of " affordable rent" in offer letter. Rent has increased by over 300.00 per month.  Now that certainly is not Affordable..

  • From raymond hunter, 13/08/2013 7:51 pm in mutual exchange refusal

    had alot of questions but you guys got all the answers thanks.

  • From tony mcq, 06/07/2013 3:45 pm in L&Q Structural problems floor shakes when neighbours walk about

    PLEASE  LET  ME  KNOW  IF  YOU  WANT  TO  SEE  ME  OR  CONTACT  ME-----ABOUT   YOUR  HOUSING  DISTURBANCE--AND  STRUC TUAL   PROBLEMSS  IM  HAVING  SAME  PROBLEMS---WITH   L Q---IS  MY LANDLORD  TOO------TONY----

  • From Jason Matthews, 25/05/2013 1:11 pm in Bedroom tax and lack of smaller properties to move into

    thanks Anna - just what I needed

  • From alan brunwin children's author, 03/08/2012 4:13 pm in Yobs with Dogs: Another "needs" based allocation outcome

    I live in shelterd housing and its a life of hell. we have a Rottweiler dog housed with two old people in a one bed no garden first floor flat next door to us 5 feet away, and its made our life hell. Kepts us awake night day with them taking the big dog down the staircase banging doors. The Housing assosiation are a law unto themselves do what they like to you. Even told us to move out if we don't like it. shame on them.The dog comes first.

IH Subscription