Friday, 18 April 2014

Mr I J SKERRITT Tenant rep melton Borough COUNCIL

Posted in: Need to Know | Ask the Experts

27/09/2010 6:44 pm

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first





29/09/2010 11:14 am

Im slightly confused as to how they received improvements under DH - do you mean the externals of the building in general and communal hallways?
in any event, this is totally irrelevant.

Again, there is no "right" to be informed that the landlord wishes to sell thier asset, they do however have a right to receive a written notice to vacate. If as you state, they are sitting tenants they cannot be forced to move and any sale of the property would likly include the tenant in situ - this is common and investors will often "take a punt" on this as the sale price is often lower due to the tenant in situ and the potential reversionary reward should the tenant elect to vacate, or pass away.

as for the landlord having 20-30 properties, this is again irrelevant. they can dispose of them as they wish at any time they wish, if all are sitting (protected) tenancies then all tenants have nothing to worry about.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

29/09/2010 10:51 am

Thank you for your speedy and I apologise for not making that clear,yes they are sitting tenants have been for 12 years and to update you they were given a VERBAL notice to quit yesterday 28.09.2010 they phoned me and I told them to get it in writing,I have since found out that the landlord owns app 20-30 properties and intends to dispose of them all the same way,these were all upgraded under the decent homes project we are talking about mansfield

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sidney Webb

Sidney Webb

Location: South East England
Posts: 224

28/09/2010 5:21 pm

You do not say if the property is being marketed as with a sitting tenant or not. This makes a difference for obvious reasons.

Could you also confirm how this private home had decent homes money spent on it - is it a leasehold property? This too could effect the rights of the tenant, and also the conduct of the sale.

Your council should have a homelessness advisor who will be able to be involved even at this stage, as a means of homelessness prevention. They should be able to gain the clear facts of the matter and then advise the tenant of the options and legal rights. They need to not lose any time in gaining formal advice that is properly informed.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply



Posts: 649

28/09/2010 12:08 pm

I agree with Anony.  I suggest you speak to Shelter these are the expert's and understand its a freephone number but you may have to wait a length of time for a answer

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply



28/09/2010 12:00 pm

If she is a private tenant with an AST contract she has no rights to be informed that the property is being speculatively marketed.

it is also irrelevant if the property has had works carried out under DH

you say "under repossetion threat" which implies the free / leaseholder has defaulted on mortgage payments, however i find it hard to believe that a lender would have gained posession and now be marketing the property without the tenant in situ knowing, in fact it is not legally possible as they would have served her with a NTQ.

By all accounts it simply sounds like the owner is testing the market at this stage, if they were to receive an offer, in all liklyhood the tenant would then be served notice, unless the incoming purchaser is also an investor who would be happy to retain her as tenant.

But to answer your question. it depends on the contract. AST = no rights.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From I am The Secret Housing Officer, 11/04/2014 9:49 am in new homeswap tenancies instead of inheriting previous tenants?

    Tenants of Registered Providers do not have a legal right to exchange unlike Secure Local Authority tenants who enjoy a Right to Exchange under the provisions of the Housing Act 1985. For tenants of RP's their rights reagrding exchanging will therefore be found in the detail of their contract (tenancy) with their landlord.

  • posted Anonymously, 10/04/2014 8:27 am in Signed new agreement, but mistake in rent

    No they shouldn't, they should build new homes or invest in current stock improvements

  • From Housing Troll, 09/04/2014 11:08 am in Joint Tenancy

    You are not being bullied, the council is fulfilling its legal duty, although perhaps they have not explained this well enough?

  • From Housing Troll, 04/04/2014 3:40 pm in Mutual Exchange Withholding of Consent to Exchange

    Yes. It may well be the case the son succeeded due to a legal or contractual term, depending on the tenancy agreement. Perhaps it was even a policy decision which did not take the adpatations into account (unlikley but possible). 

  • From Miss Muffett, 02/04/2014 2:47 pm in Help with challnege of Service Charges??

    Sorry, typo in title - should obviously be challenge!!

  • From Eve Steadman, 25/03/2014 6:51 am in Terrible service from housing assoc

    Further to my previous post: I would like to form a contact/pressure group of Metropolitan residents (South), which includes my own area, Cambridge. Please spread the word and provide ideas as to how all those residents may be contacted, and how we could establish communication independedently of this forum. Do many or any residents read Metropolitan's Facebook page?

  • From Macca57, 24/03/2014 4:10 pm in Tenancy succession

    Many thanks for your reply, much appreciated

  • posted Anonymously, 24/03/2014 10:29 am in Service Charge Increase Legal? Moral?

    Legal: It is alawys a mistake to think of change of service charge cost as an increase - is it the correct cost for the services provided? & are those costs reasonable (i.e. for the service you recieve are the costs in the right ball park)

  • posted Anonymously, 21/03/2014 4:31 pm in Please help... Mutual exchange


  • From H4rdwork, 21/03/2014 1:06 pm in HELP!! Working as a Housing Officer in Supported Living

    Sara, you'll impress if you show you've researched a topic and part of the job that's new to you, and ask intelligent questions about how that organisation manages risk, compared to your research.