Monday, 22 September 2014

Pinnock family evicted after legal battle

The family at the centre of a landmark court ruling have been evicted after a six-year battle.

Cleveland Pinnock has been evicted from his house in Manchester following a catalogue of crime and nuisance behaviour carried out by his sons, even though he was sole tenant of the property.

Mr Pinnock’s partner, Christine Walker, has also been evicted.

Manchester Council tried to repossess Mr Pinnock’s house in 2005 on the basis that Mr Pinnock’s children and his partner, but not Mr Pinnock himself, had caused a serious nuisance. In 2007, the council successfully applied for an order demoting the tenancy, meaning that he was no longer a secure tenant.

Following further problems, the council applied for a possession order to evict the family, which Manchester County Court granted in December 2008.

Mr Pinnock then appealed against this possession order, citing his human rights.

In July 2009, the Court of Appeal upheld Manchester County Court’s decision to grant Manchester Council possession of the property. Mr Pinnock then appealed to the Supreme Court, but it upheld the possession order.

In the judgement, delivered last November, the Supreme Court ruled courts must test the proportionality of a landlord’s decision to carry out mandatory possession proceedings, meaning a court will take into account a tenant’s personal circumstances. Although this did not affect the outcome of the Pinnock case, it is already having an impact on other hearings.

Geoff Little, Manchester Council’s deputy chief executive, said: ‘The family of Cleveland Pinnock have blighted the community over many years and the community should be relieved that we have now successfully evicted them. The council is committed to ensuring that its tenants do not have to suffer the misery of anti-social and criminal behaviour.

‘He has tried to use the courts to block the process at every step of the way, but we were always clear that we were right to evict him, and we welcome the fact that the Supreme Court has upheld our decision.’

Readers' comments (19)

  • At most I come to this web-site 3 times a week, one thing I do notice is that all the critisism comes from the same few names day after day, page after page. Do you few that have all this time actually have job's your-selves or are you supported by the government/ tax payer ?????????

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sidney Webb

    I am a worker, a Socialist and a taxpayer. I am also a free citizen and a human being.

    I am what I am. Your issue Andrew?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ Jack Davies

    I think the difference is that social landlords are regulated and monitored on performance and more than that, they tend to be responsible landlords and don't pass the buck when their tenants break the conditions of their tenancy. Nor do they wait for things to get so bad that the police are required.

    when police are required they are called and most landlords work jointly with police to tackle ASB and youth nuisance.

    In terms of cost, how many additional police would it take and at what cost to manage all instances of ASB if landlords decided that it wasn't their business. I'd argue the current solution is preferable as I'd rather we let police get on with more pressing matters.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Andrew Spear | 13/04/2011 1:31 pm

    the fact that you come 3 times a week might well mean you spend three whole day on this website. In fact you might well spend the whole week on this website without ever posting anything. And if you are a housing professional employee what does your employer say about paying for your time?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Melvin Bone

    PSR and me work in the same office and only post on here because we are bored.

    We are both deputy directors of a very large HA.

    PSR Have you finished with my 'What Yacht' magazine yet?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Bonola – “....most landlords work jointly with police to tackle ASB and youth nuisance.” So it is only young people then when the ASB stats show the majority of those awarded are not to youths?
    Your final paragraph uses cost as the reason for the discrimination and lesser service that social tenants receive and attempts to absolve the police for their passing of the buck to social landlords (who admittedly agreed to take on ASB matters in a very foolhardy decision).
    If that is the best justification you have for the Police, whose services are paid for by social tenants, allowing them to receive a service that has no deterrent factor and inferior to the full force of the law that private tenants and owner occupiers get as a matter of course, then its a very poor argument

    By the way des anyone know just how much MCC has spent in staff and legal costs on this one eviction? I cant see any change out of 250k and maybe much more - and the persons evicted can move into a private let next door - wow that reslolves the problem doesnt it!!!

    It would buy a few police officers salaries for a year id bet Bonola!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sidney Webb

    Sorry Melvin - I left it in the Executive Lounge along with your new copy of A Planners Guide to Minimalisation - development beyond 2012.
    Anyway, can't stop - the Berlin Exchange closes soon and I just need to check my holdings.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Meiow!! Loose women eat your hearts out.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having read this story the most obvious question which springs to mind is where did they go. I have no sympathy for them whatsoever but they obviously went somewhere. If they did not go into privately rented accommodation, unlikely I would have thought without references, have they been dumped on somebody elses doorstep in another authority ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Related

Articles

Resources

  • Acting out to tackle domestic abuse

    28/03/2014

    An interactive training course is helping housing professionals in the south west identify and tackle domestic abuse. Lydia Stockdale finds out how

  • Reaching crisis point

    02/05/2014

    Tenants on the verge of eviction are being helped to remain in their homes by a recently formed social enterprise that is saving their landlords significant sums in the process. Daniel Douglas finds out how

  • Fighting back

    01//11/2013

    As the private rented sector continues to grow, so does the number of problematic landlords. Michael Pooler finds out how tenants are taking matters into their own hands to fight for better conditions

  • Mind over matter

    09/05/2014

    A Merseyside landlord is training its staff to become mental health first aiders to help them support both colleagues and tenants, as Helen Clifton reports

  • Staying power

    04/10/2013

    By providing a range of services from discounted furniture to advice on everything from welfare to energy, one social enterprise is enabling tenants to avoid debt and stay in their home for longer. Louise Hunt reports.

IH Subscription