Saturday, 25 October 2014

New horizons

I expect to see the first multinational housing associations become a reality over the next few years.

The European Commission is clear when it comes to housing: it is a national responsibility and this means national policy determines the structure of housing markets. However, it has no objection to housing providers operating in different European Union countries as long as they respect national law. In fact, cross-border operations (within the EU) are a major objective of the EU’s internal market that seeks to guarantee the free movement of goods, capital, services and people. National and local governments that have challenged housing associations’ decisions to invest abroad have lost in court over the past few years.

Of course, housing providers should not consider becoming an international landlord if they do not gain any significant benefits. As it happens, though, it is clear there are a number of important advantages.

First, in a tight capital market investors are interested in portfolios that have spread risks. A geographical spread is a bonus and will allow providers of capital to improve their offer. Moreover, the capital market will be extended to the different countries of operation and give a better access to globally operating investors.

Second, operating internationally guarantees that knowledge within the organisation will improve. Combining best practice from similar landlords with different cultural and historical backgrounds will lead to more efficient and effective performance. As an international operating organisation you will be able to attract the best available professionals.

Finally, there is nothing like one European housing market and even on a national level housing markets are fragmented. By operating in different markets and different segments of these markets you will be more flexible and ready to deal with demographic changes.

Although I see enormous benefits of internationally operating housing associations, there are a number of pitfalls that should be considered.

The aforementioned benefits can only be achieved when the organisation of activities and assets are managed well. This means that the operation on different markets should offer tailor-made solutions. I would also like to stress the importance of the local role that is performed by landlords. Proximity to tenants and other stakeholders (such as local governments and local providers) is an important key to success. Housing providers must make sure that by becoming international organisations they do not lose their ability to respond to local need.

The challenge, therefore, will be to bring the benefits that you obtain from being an international organisation to your tenants.

Corné Koppelaar is the founder of Global Habitat

Readers' comments (2)

  • F451

    Surely one of the outcomes of the latest reactionary decision from our leadership is that such structures will not now be possible. Instead we may see ever wealthier European companies and public bodies buying up ever higher proportions of British business and infrastructure, to recharge to this population at the profit of theirs.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Jono

    I don't agree.

    1 - spreading risk only works if the EU and UK markets are separate in terms of the factors which result in growth or contraction. As we have seen, this isn't true to a considerable extent. Additionally you would introduce exchange rate risk, and costs of associated hedging. Such costs higher at times of uncertainty - you could say - times like these. Plus the tax implications.

    2. Knowledge sharing could (and does) take place without forming multinational housing associations or groups. Is this a new gain? I suspect not. The cutting edge housing associations will already be learning from other housing models - otherwise what are their high earning execs doing to warrant their leadership salaries?

    3. This third point needs a bit more explanation. How does demographic change in France, or Greece, prepare us for demographic change in the UK? The challenges posed will depend on the socio-economic factors affecting those demographic groups. This limits considerably how transferrable these experiences are.

    Finally the risks - yes there are many - and you would need the services of experts in the field - such as... Global Habitat?

    Dare I suggest this piece is a commercial Inside Housing!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Related

Articles

  • Brave new world for housing

    05/09/2014

    A concerted and combined effort could change the face of housing in the UK, argues Grainia Long

  • A new approach

    11/07/2014

    The new chair of BME National, Cym D’Souza, is starting at a crucial moment for the black and minority ethnic housing sector.

  • New model for eco homes

    24 April 2014

    The first 100 per cent affordable Passivhaus scheme for the UK shows prefab doesn’t mean poor quality, writes Daniel Douglas after a site visit

  • Debt: the new safety net?

    11 April 2014

    The ‘dark underside’ of debt was examined yesterday in a report, suggesting that more and more people are ‘using credit unsustainably as a personal safety net.’

  • New lexicon

    06/12/2013

    For housing associations, ‘commercial’ is the word of the year - but it has many meanings, says Steve Douglas

IH Subscription

- IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT -

 

You will soon need to sign into www.insidehousing.co.uk using your email address rather than your username.

If you are unsure which email address is linked to your account, please Click Here. Your password will remain the same.

If you have a print subscription we need to ensure that we have the correct details in order to link your subscription to your online account, for more information Click Here.

Click Here to close window or press the Esc key.