Wednesday, 23 April 2014

MP calls for compulsory solar panels on new homes

The Conservative MP for Carlisle has called for the fitting of solar panels to be compulsory on all new build homes.

John Stevenson asked communities minister Andrew Stunell if he would introduce the requirement as part of changes to building regulations during Communities and Local Government department questions on Monday.

Mr Stunell said proposals in the consultation on the latest regulations ‘will go a long way towards what he is seeking to achieve’.

The consultation on Part L of the building regulations, which covers conservation of fuel and power, requires landlords carrying out extensions or improvements to homes to undertake energy efficiency work.

However it also proposes cutting a 2013 carbon reduction target for new homes from 25 per cent on 2002 levels to just 8 per cent.

The consultation closes on 27 March.

Inside Housing is conducting a survey of energy efficiency measures with Willmott Dixon. Take part to have a chance of winning £500 of Marks & Spencer vouchers.

Readers' comments (14)

  • Rick Campbell

    The man's an out and out eejit -- not all roofs will be facing the optimum direction.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Fear & Loathing

    Rick. If they are on new houses then they could be built the right way round.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick Campbell

    That would mean that all houses would be facing the same direction -- not a realistic prospect and there will be natural or built obstacles preventing the required amount of sunlight.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To be honest, they only really need to be facing up and they'll be alright. PVs are basically compulsory for all affordable new builds anyway as a result of the Code for sustainable homes. Nothing to see here, move along.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick Campbell

    That's an interesting point Sancho ...

    I was under the impression that the efficacy of solar panels was determined by the direction they faced and whether there was unimpeded access to sunlight.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick, in part your right, if the panels move with the sun (as they do in the big solar energy farms) the the most energy can be gleaned. Obviously this kind of tech is too expensive to have in every new build. Solar panels continue to produce energy from light even if they don't track the path of the sun. I hope that the consultation process produces some recommendations including the more common sense principles such as prioritizing all south facing slope roofs, ensuring that the most efficient system is used (such as monocrystalline, polycrystalline or thin film) and that appropriate power optimizers are installed to gain the most value.  Surely that's the point of a consultation?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I really also wanted to say that although some developers find the National Standard constraining, most buyers like the idea. I think as time goes on and as tech options develop (and become cheaper, more efficient and with more choice about what options suit different designs or locations) some currently unviable options might become the norm with roofs designed to be a single south facing slope, having no pitch, with their entire surface able to support a home and possibly put energy back into the grid. energy. I recall 30 years ago in my old primary school doing a project on houses of the future and the roofs on all my and my peers drawings were 100% solar panels. It made sense to children then, the last government thought it made sense and they wrote a Standard and now the Communities Minister is listening to a consultation. At long last!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • C'mon Sense

    Do they get sun in Carlise???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • living in cloud-cuckoo land - not all houses or roofs fit for solar PV or thermal panel installation, this is still far too expensive for the returns in energy/green house gas emissions avoided.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its a headline grabbing proposal but the government should be setting a standard for energy efficiency not specifying the technology. Slapping a PV panel on every new home without regard for overall energy effeicency and how they will be used and maintained could be inneffectual. (See Tim Harford's excellent analysis of the impact of the Merton rule.)

    Insisting on a minimum of Code for Sustsainble Homes Level 4 for all new homes would leave the architects to put in the most appropriate solution. Even better the government should be using the tax system (Stamp Duty/Council Tax /New Homes Bonus) to incentivise even greater energy efficiency.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Related

Articles

  • A SHIFT in attitude

    13/09/2013

    Social housing is becoming greener according to the latest assessment, but with cash tight will this trend continue? Andrew Eagles and Richard Lupo report

  • Hitting target

    01//11/2013

    Should the big six energy companies be given more time to meet their targets under the energy company obligation? John Barnham and Andrew Waren debate

  • ECO cuts put landlords’ retrofit plans at risk

    06/12/2013

    Government plans to cut back a vital £1.3 billion a year green subsidy have left hundreds of millions of pounds of social housing retrofit projects across Britain at risk.

  • Countdown to zero

    13/09/2013

    By 2016, the government wants all new homes to be zero carbon. So what impact will plans to scrap the code for sustainable homes in favour of revamping part L of the Building Regulations have on meeting this goal? Keith Cooper investigates

  • Sustainable Housing, Winter 2013

    01//11/2013

    Our quarterly focus on sustainability takes an indepth look at whether green taxes are to blame for energy price rises, developers paying to ‘offset’ biodiversity and the Sustainable Housing Awards 2013

Resources

  • Green guru - future proofing

    24/05/2013

    In a time of financial restraint, it is only by trialling and analysing the various funding schemes and retrofit approaches available that asset managers can successfully future-proof their social housing stock, says John Barnham

  • How to... cut red tape

    24/05/2013

    The government is right to cut overlapping housing standards but it must be careful not to chop rules that make houses sustainable, says the UK Green Building Council’s Paul King

  • Energy efficient

    10 May 2013

    Landlords should carefully consider energy efficient offers that are likely to come their way, says Patrick Sweeney

  • Managing expectations

    6 June 2013

    With landlords under pressure to demonstrate value for money, Stuart McBride, from law firm TLT, examines how to address poor employee performance

  • A bright idea

    22/11/2013

    Why has a Sunderland-based social landlord set up a charity providing solar powered lamps to communities in Africa? Martin Hilditch finds out