Thursday, 24 April 2014

Fed calls for time limit on right to buy replacement

The National Housing Federation has called on the government to set a fixed time frame for the replacement of homes sold under the right to buy.

Prime minister David Cameron yesterday officially launched the ‘reinvigorated’ right to buy in England, which includes a significantly increased discount cap of £75,000.

The government has promised all additional homes sold through the right to buy will be replaced with new homes for affordable rent.

Questions have been raised about whether it can deliver on this promise, given the substantial discounts that will be available.

The NHF is calling for the government to set a limit on the length of time before money raised through the right to buy has to be spent on building a new home.

Chief executive David Orr said: ‘Britain is in the middle of a huge housing crisis and the redesigned right to buy scheme should help more people buy their own home.

‘But with 4.5 million people on waiting lists, it is crucial the scheme replaces the homes sold, one-for-one, as soon as possible. Otherwise we’ll never get to grips with England’s housing shortage.

‘We want the government to introduce a fixed time by which the money raised is re-invested in a new affordable home - or it risks undoing what it aims to achieve.’

Under the government’s plans only 30 per cent of the cost of building a new home would be funded through right to buy receipts, with the remainder to be secured through other financing mechanisms, or council assets.

If local authorities are not able to use the money locally then it will be moved into a central pot and redistributed by the Homes and Communities Agency.

Readers' comments (3)

  • There is a lot of mis conceptions about the Right to Buy Scheme, and the large "discounts" off the open market value, but are these really discounts when you look at the build costs and how much rent has been paid already. I am not so sure.. there are also a fiar few other conditions which need to be met in order to even qualify, and thats without even taking in to account the mortgage lenders requirements... see ) So will it really help the poorest get on the property ladder, probably not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick Campbell

    Perhaps the NHF are trying to help the government -- say, for example there's a 3 year limit within 'the replacement property' has to be built.

    After the 3 years is up and no replacement property has been built (built, not started) then the money goes off to the HCA.


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Progressive Solutions Required

    How about if after 3-years the government has not enabled a replacement home to be built then the government refunds the purchase and the original home reverts to social tenure - the tenant will not lose either money nor home over this, but of course will need to still meet the occupancy criteria!

    Seriously though, this is yet another on the hoofism by this government that they probably could have done without - if they had just stuck to the original mass privatisation of everything that gives ordinary people a chance in life then they would not have tied themselves up in knots through trying to appear fair and no longer being the Nasty Party!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters



  • The right to buy deficit


    The government promised that all social homes lost to its revamped right to buy would be replaced. But two years in, the numbers aren’t adding up. Pete Apps investigates

  • The housing takeaway


    The government promised that all homes sold under its revamped right to buy scheme would be replaced. One year in, Neil Merrick finds some councils are struggling to meet the pledge

  • Pickled homes

    20 February 2014

  • Councils struggle to replace homes sold under the right to buy


    The government’s promise that council homes sold under the rejuvenated right to buy would be replaced one for one is not working financially, Inside Housing can reveal.

  • Sales of social homes up 128% in five years

    10 October 2013

    The number of social homes sold has risen by 128 per cent in five years, figures released by the Communities and Local Government department showed today.


  • The return of PFI


    New-look private finance initiatives could help ease the housing crisis, says Penny Rinta-Suksi, housing and regeneration partner at Bevan Brittan

  • Staying power


    By providing a range of services from discounted furniture to advice on everything from welfare to energy, one social enterprise is enabling tenants to avoid debt and stay in their home for longer. Louise Hunt reports.

  • Precision thinking

    15 January 2014

    Analysis of its lets, voids and tenancy lengths has allowed Adactus Housing Group to cut its planned maintenance bill by millions of pounds a year and plough the savings into developing new homes. Kate Youde finds out how

  • Room for procurement savings


    Scotland’s social housing sector is still dogged by the spectre of unnecessary procurement costs but it could save up to £42 million per year

  • Make yourself at home


    A midlands-based landlord is offering tenants a chance to get a foot on the housing ladder and acquire work skills by building their own homes, as Helen Clifton finds out