Friday, 06 March 2015

Fed calls for time limit on right to buy replacement

The National Housing Federation has called on the government to set a fixed time frame for the replacement of homes sold under the right to buy.

Prime minister David Cameron yesterday officially launched the ‘reinvigorated’ right to buy in England, which includes a significantly increased discount cap of £75,000.

The government has promised all additional homes sold through the right to buy will be replaced with new homes for affordable rent.

Questions have been raised about whether it can deliver on this promise, given the substantial discounts that will be available.

The NHF is calling for the government to set a limit on the length of time before money raised through the right to buy has to be spent on building a new home.

Chief executive David Orr said: ‘Britain is in the middle of a huge housing crisis and the redesigned right to buy scheme should help more people buy their own home.

‘But with 4.5 million people on waiting lists, it is crucial the scheme replaces the homes sold, one-for-one, as soon as possible. Otherwise we’ll never get to grips with England’s housing shortage.

‘We want the government to introduce a fixed time by which the money raised is re-invested in a new affordable home - or it risks undoing what it aims to achieve.’

Under the government’s plans only 30 per cent of the cost of building a new home would be funded through right to buy receipts, with the remainder to be secured through other financing mechanisms, or council assets.

If local authorities are not able to use the money locally then it will be moved into a central pot and redistributed by the Homes and Communities Agency.

Readers' comments (3)

  • There is a lot of mis conceptions about the Right to Buy Scheme, and the large "discounts" off the open market value, but are these really discounts when you look at the build costs and how much rent has been paid already. I am not so sure.. there are also a fiar few other conditions which need to be met in order to even qualify, and thats without even taking in to account the mortgage lenders requirements... see ) So will it really help the poorest get on the property ladder, probably not.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick Campbell

    Perhaps the NHF are trying to help the government -- say, for example there's a 3 year limit within 'the replacement property' has to be built.

    After the 3 years is up and no replacement property has been built (built, not started) then the money goes off to the HCA.


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Chris

    How about if after 3-years the government has not enabled a replacement home to be built then the government refunds the purchase and the original home reverts to social tenure - the tenant will not lose either money nor home over this, but of course will need to still meet the occupancy criteria!

    Seriously though, this is yet another on the hoofism by this government that they probably could have done without - if they had just stuck to the original mass privatisation of everything that gives ordinary people a chance in life then they would not have tied themselves up in knots through trying to appear fair and no longer being the Nasty Party!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up



IH Subscription