Tuesday, 21 October 2014

Rights law is an asset

Without article 8, those in bedroom tax disputes will have an uphill struggle, says Giles Peaker, solicitor at Anthony Gold

As the home and justice secretaries openly consider abandoning the Human Rights Act and withdrawing from the European Convention on Human Rights, what would that mean for social housing? (Leaving aside questions of whether such a withdrawal would be remotely possible.)

Possession cases

The most obvious effect would be on possession. Social housing providers are becoming familiar with tenants facing eviction using human rights defences, based upon disproportionate interference with article 8 rights to private and family life. These defences are raised in situations where the court has no discretion over making a possession order and cannot consider for itself whether it is reasonable. Introductory and demoted tenancies, ‘starter’ assured shortholds, failed successions and non-secure tenancies or licences are the well-known examples.

While some social housing providers might consider a disappearance of article 8 defences to be a relief, all article 8 requires is the possession proceedings to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. The landlord needs to have properly considered its reasons for seeking possession in view of the occupant’s circumstances. This should not be a requirement that has to be imposed by human rights law.

The Equality Act

Other rights that come up in housing cases are arguably already incorporated into the Equality Act 2010. The disappearance of article 14 on discrimination would certainly not relieve social housing providers of their duties not to discriminate, directly or indirectly, in relation to the various protected characteristics set out in the equality act. This is because public bodies and/or landlords and service providers would still be subject to that duty.

But article 14 may yet come to the rescue of social landlords facing the bleak alternatives of the bedroom tax, losing rent through redesignation of properties, or spending increased sums on administration, pursuit of arrears and possession proceedings.

Bedroom tax challenges

Ten judicial reviews of the bedroom tax regulations, due for a full hearing in early May, are based upon grounds of discrimination against disabled adults and children who are unable for various reasons to share bedrooms. Such a direct challenge would be far harder on traditional public law grounds. Whether these claims will be successful has yet to be seen, but the precedent of the Gorry v Wiltshire case is encouraging.

Successful claims may result in the Department for Work and Pensions redrawing the regulations and at least some households being exempted from the bedroom tax easing the problems facing housing providers and releasing them from some very hard decisions. There is also a separate judicial review on article 8 grounds by Liberty based on children of separated families.

Some social housing providers have grumbled about the effect of the HRA on their housing management, though it is hard to see which requirements wouldn’t be good practice anyway.

But both the reason why ministers want rid of the HRA and its merits for the rest of us become clear in the challenges to the bedroom tax regulations, causing serious issues for social tenants and landlords alike.

giles.peaker@anthonygold.co.uk

Readers' comments (2)


  • Nice to see you making your debut in IH. Your website - nearlylegal.co.uk - is fantastic.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The con dems have rushed through severe leglislation to
    attack the British poor non stop over the past 3 years,by
    imposing cuts of £24 Billion of vital and legal entitlements
    to welfare payments, that have been built up over 70 years
    through Parliamentary rights.As well as disregarding other
    legal principles in attacking the poor: for example
    The Equality Act / The con dems "decide " who has to suffer under
    these benefit cuts(working age people) / and / who they choose
    to can avoid any such harm (pensioners).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Related

Articles

Resources

  • After a fashion

    14/03/2014

    Regenda’s community apprentice scheme gives struggling tenants just the help they need.

  • The key to recovery

    25/10/2013

    Can living in general needs homes give drug and alcohol abusers a better chance of recovery? Caroline Thorpe reports on the three-year pilot study in Northamptonshire that tried to find out

  • Dragons' Den for retrofit technology

    4 September 2014

    Copying the popular BBC format, Accord Group set up a Dragons’ Den of its own to find the best green technologies to test in a £3m retrofit project. Simon Brandon finds out why

  • Connect found

    31/01/2014

    A mobile phone health and well-being ‘app’ is transforming the lives of Bristol residents. Alex Turner reports

  • A bright idea

    22/11/2013

    Why has a Sunderland-based social landlord set up a charity providing solar powered lamps to communities in Africa? Martin Hilditch finds out

IH Subscription

- IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT -

 

You will soon need to sign into www.insidehousing.co.uk using your email address rather than your username.

If you are unsure which email address is linked to your account, please Click Here. Your password will remain the same.

If you have a print subscription we need to ensure that we have the correct details in order to link your subscription to your online account, for more information Click Here.

Click here to close window