Tuesday, 03 March 2015

Nightmare on Greek Street

The government has withdrawn funding from England’s first nine pathfinders. Without cash to complete their projects, Keith Cooper asks what the future holds for the areas they were created to regenerate and the residents trapped in nightmare neighbourhoods.

Teresa Bartlett is just one of thousands of residents whose lives are tied to the fate of the housing market renewal pathfinders.

These nine organisations were established by the Labour government in 2002 with a 10 to 15-year mission: to tackle what had become widely accepted as a signficant problem in housing markets and communities in traditional Labour heartlands.

Hull resident

Source: Guzelian

Large areas of former urban authorities, including Newcastle in the north east, Birmingham in the midlands and Ms Bartlett’s home city of Hull on the Humber were being afflicted with what policy analysts and academics called market failure. Unpopular areas of towns and cities, streets and housing estates, were being abandoned in their droves by residents willing and able to escape the terminal decay that had set in.

Labour’s favoured solution, as trumpeted by then deputy prime minister John Prescott, was to set up and fund the pathfinders to fix these failing housing markets. Many of the areas earmarked for rejuvenation, including Greek Street in Hull where Ms Bartlett rented her three-bedroom house, were considered by the pathfinders as beyond help: their favoured, expensive and often controversial solution was to demolish and rebuild; to rejig the housing market from scratch.

In Hull alone 1,031 homes have been bought with government cash from homeowners and landlords. The pathfinder programme as a whole has seen 21,765 homes acquired and 20,586 knocked down, according to Homes and Communities Agency figures.

Tenants, such as Ms Bartlett, and homeowners who have agreed or were forced to sell their homes in clearance areas have received financial compensation to move. It has been an expensive business. By the end of this financial year £2.25 billion of taxpayers’ money will have been poured into areas afflicted by market failure.

Scuppered plans
This very New Labour project has now however been brought to a shuddering halt by the coalition government. In October last year the pathfinders’ long-term plans were thrown into disarray when chancellor George Osborne announced the end of their dedicated funding pot. This cleansweep has been devasating for the pathfinders themselves and its repercussions spread almost immediately to those living in clearance areas.

So can anything be salvaged from this multi-billion pound programme and what does the chancellor’s decision mean for the people left behind?

Resident repercussions
Ms Bartlett, a 28-year-old mother of two, was among 150 residents from whom Gateway Hull was forced to withdraw its offer of help to move. She was eventually able to move after Hull Council found £2.5 million from its own coffers to help prop up the acquisition programme. Gateway has, however, still been forced to scale back its plans to such an extent that £800 million of private sector investment it helped secure for the next five to 10 years is now likely to vanish.

‘Improvements and investment to date will be lost, with regeneration areas returning to their pre-intervention state,’ a spokesperson added. ‘Residents in clearance areas will be left in intolerable conditions with no certainty about why they can move to a new home,’ she added.\

Ms Bartlett paid testament to the horror of being stuck in a clearance area (see box: Moving on). As a private tenant, she was unable to move until the pathfinder agreed a selling price with her landlord. This left her and her children, aged five and 11, stuck in the only occupied house on an otherwise empty street. Damp crept through her walls from the unheated homes that sandwiched her own. The noise of thieves ripping metal and lead off the roofs of neighbouring properties kept the her awake at night. ‘It was not very nice, especially when you are there on your own with two children,’ she said.

The nine pathfinders have been hit in different ways by the funding cut, as our short survey shows (see box: Pathfinders. Those in Newcastle/Gateshead and Staffordshire have already said they will close in April. Redunancies have been announced or are threatened in others. The Manchester/Salford pathfinder has been left with relatively few properties awaiting demolition but the regeneration plans of cleared areas have been left with black holes in their budgets.

‘The withdrawal of the dedicated HMR funding stream has occurred at a time when significant investment of housing renewal is required,’ a spokesperson for the pathfinder said.

Ian Cole, professor of housing studies at Sheffield Hallam University, said the suddeness of the funding cuts could prove very damaging. ‘The programme was always set up as a 10 to 15-year programme but given the short-term nature of the [funding] allocation cycle the real question is that the government has not looked at how the programme might be phased down by re-programming,’ he added. ‘They have just cut if off at the knees.’

Brendan Nevin, visiting professor at the University of Manchester and one of the architects of the pathfinder programme, is concerned about the lack of a dedicated funding pot. ‘If you look at the comprehensive spending review it’s the first time in 60 years that there is no hypothecated funding for urban renewal.’

The future of funding
The coalition has given pathfinders’ access to an alternative source of funding: the £1.4 billion regional growth fund, which was announced in last October’s spending review.

Roy Irwin, director of housing and economic development at the Audit Commission, believes local enterprise partnerships, which are replacing regional development agencies, are likely to drive market renewal when pathfinder funding runs out. These partnerships bring together local authority and business representatives to drive economic growth in their areas. They are the sort of organisations that will be able to make the case for a share of the regional growth fund.

‘Not all pathfinders have a LEP in place,’ Mr Irwin warned. ‘Some might find they have withered on the vine before the LEP has been set up.’


Moving on: Teresa’s story

‘We lived here for five years. It was nice when we first moved in but things started to change when people moved out. It became a bit like Beirut.
‘I was the only one on my row and couldn’t sleep because people came round taking metal and lead off the roofs of the other houses at night. I was really uneasy. The house was damp because of the other houses being empty; it wasn’t very nice, especially when you are on your own with two children.

‘I had to wait for my private landlord to sell our house to the council. Finally, we were told that we would be able to move but then the government pulled the funding so there was no money for people to move. Money was tight. I had to sell my car so I could move.’

Ms Bartlett was awarded £4,700 for losing her home. In December she moved into Heathfield Square, part of the new St Andrew’s development owned by housing group Places for People. Her move was eventually funded by Hull Council.

Pathfinders: what happens next?

New Heartlands

Homes acquired for demolition: 4,933
Funding to 2009/10: £295 million

This pathfinder, which covers Liverpool, Sefton and the Wirral, is about half way through its regeneration scheme. It originally aimed to complete in 2018.

Talks are underway with the three local authorities to work out how the pathfinder’s work will continue. Since its creation, New Heartlands has overseen the construction of almost 9,865 homes, 76 per cent of which were affordable homes for sale on the private market.

Manchester/ Salford Pathfinder

Homes acquired for demolition: 3,405
Funding to 2009/10: £322 million

Manchester and Salford councils are examining how to continue the pathfinder’s work after March. So far it has overseen construction of 1,132 homes against an original target of 12,011. The number of properties awaiting demolition are ‘relatively small’ but the authorities need funding to complete the pathfinder’s regeneration work.

‘The withdrawal of the dedicated HMR [housing market renewal] funding stream has occurred at a time when significant investment of housing renewal is required to safeguard progress to date,’ a spokesperson said.

Regenerate Pennine Lancashire

Acquired for demolition: 2,700*
Funding to 2009/10: £270 million

RPL is shifting the focus of its work from housing market renewal to ‘support and nurture enterprise growth in the region’. The loss of funding has seen 35 staff served with redundancy notices.

The pathfinder’s success in fixing failing housing markets in Lancashire, already damaged by the recession and housing market downturn, is likely to be hit hard by the funding cut, a spokesperson said. House prices taken at neighbourhood level in market renewal areas in early 2010 were less than a third of the regional average.

‘Without funding, there is a risk that the HMR areas will become further detached from the housing market,’ the spokesperson added.

* small number for refurbishment

Gateway Hull

Homes acquired for demolition: 1,031
Funding to 2009/10: £112 million

The city’s pathfinder’s original blueprint for regeneration extended into 2020. Since 2004, Gateway Hull has overseen the construction of 1,400 homes. The loss of funding has forced the pathfinder to inform 150 residents and owners that their properties can no longer be purchased or helped to move. The pathfinder needs at least £4 million to complete its clearance programme but admits that budget restrictions across the public sector will make it very difficult to secure alternative funding.

‘These incomplete clearance areas impact on the surrounding areas, with the potential to spread blight and undermine the value of all the investment to date,’ a spokesperson for the pathfinder said.

Urban Living

Homes acquired for demolition: approx 1,700
Funding to 2009/10: £139 million

The pathfinder for Birmingham and Sandwell is eight years through its original 15-year programme. Demolitions will go ahead, a spokesperson for Urban Living said, as ‘the local authorities have set aside sufficient resources to do so or plan to utilise future capital receipts to complete this work’.

Development sites acquired by the pathfinder have the capacity for 2,400 homes, a quarter of which were planned to be affordable. Following funding cuts, Birmingham and Sandwell are looking at alternative approaches to develop these sites, including a more flexible approach to tenure mix. Eighteen staff are being made redundant

Oldham/ Rochdale

Homes acquired and demolished: Oldham, 732; Rochdale, 501 (not all demolished)
Funding to 2009/10: £184 million

The pathfinder programme was due to end in 2019. ‘The end of funding to transform housing markets in neigbourhoods across Rochdale and Oldham will leave much work undone,’ a spokesperson for the pathfinder said.

Both councils have, however, committed to pursue other forms of funding. A core team of around 60 staff which were funded by pathfinder cash could be made redundant.

The loss of dedicated funding ‘presents huge challenges for the future of housing markets in Oldham and Rochdale,’ the spokesperson added. Both authorities are considering making bids to the £1.4 billion regional growth fund.

Renew North Staffordshire

Homes acquired for demolition: 2,332*, (94 per cent of which have been demolished)
Funding to 2009/10: £178 million

Renew’s regeneration programme has been cut in half by the government’s funding cleansweep from 15 years to seven. The pathfinder oversaw the construction of 4,311 homes. A further 6,000 were originally planned for the next 10 years. This figure has now halved. The pathfinder is looking at ways to raise money from the sites and properties it has amassed. The loss of funding has rendered plans to build 90 extra care homes and 20 bungalows in the city unviable.

‘This will impact on the city’s ability to meet demands for extra care provision,’ Hardial Bhogal, director of place at Stoke Council said. Renew is due to close on 31 March.

*includes 228 acquired by other organisations


Homes acquired and demolished: 1,253
Funding to 2009/10: £200 million

The Bridging Newcastle Gateshead pathfinder is due to close in April. Sheila Tolley, interim director at BNG, said the funding cuts had not changed its plans ‘at this moment in time’.

The pathfinder’s demolition programme for the 2010/11 financial year will proceed as planned. Over the next 15 to 20 years, almost 2,200 new homes are planned for the Scotswood area of Newcastle with 3,000 family homes due to be created in Gateshead.

Transform South Yorkshire

Funding to 2009/10: £245 million

This pathfinder was unable to provide figures for acquisitions and demolitions.

Its regeneration programme was due to run for 15 years but it is now expected to end in March. Jeff Goode, director of Transform South Yorkshire, said it was difficult to determine the precise impact on the redevelopment schemes the pathfinder was involved in.

Replacement funding was being sought, he added. ‘Our partners are keen to find alternative sources of funding wherever they can,’ Mr Goode said. Transform was prioritising unfinished schemes.




Readers' comments (5)

  • John Earnshaw

    This is a sad story indeed, but not an accurate picture of what is wrong and why!
    Some of those people, especially in Gateshead, Goole, Hull, Liverpool, Manchester, Middlesbrough, Newcastle, Stoke and Salford have been living in 'blighted neighbourhoods' for well over 20 years now and are continuing to do so because of all the unecessary red tape and bureaucracy we have in this country, coupled up with certain politicians who keep changing their minds about what to do with these low demand houses!
    These poor people have become political pawns in the 'UK's Property Game' and they keep getting kicked from pillar to post, whilst the politicians keep moving the goal posts!
    I've openly challenged and invited the Prime Minister, his Communities Secretary and his Housing Minister, to an open debate on this major housing issue, (and suggested alternatives to them) in a concerted effort to get these 'forgotten' people into to some kind of decent housing - todate, I've not had any replies from any of them, which speaks volumes!
    I've also written to Joe Anderson, the 'new' Labour Leader of Liverpool City Council several times and he has not replied!
    I think the politicians are too busy looking after their own interests to bother about these fogotten people and they seem to make empty promises without giving much thought to the real, day to day housing problems facing these people!
    I've made many practical suggestions over the years, on how 'they' can continue to tackle this huge UK housing problem, taking into account that there are now, over 5 million people on the UK's housing waiting lists and very few new houses being built!
    There are over 11,000 empty HMRP houses in Liverpool waiting for 20,000 or so people on their waiting lists to occupy them, but it seems that Liverpool City Council just want to demolish perfectly good houses in their own time without any consideration whatsoever for those people who are still living in them, many in a run down and unhealthy state!
    The re-furbishing of these empty houses, as I've outlined in 2005, 2007 and 2009, on a paper I prepard for Hull City Council, entitled HELP in Hull (and other housing professionals have mentioned similar things), would 'kick start all the local economies in each of the Pathfinder areas and provide much needed employment, but who is listening out there? - it seems, no-one!
    The government has recently introduced a financial incentive to get empty homes back into use - will 'they' use it in the HMRP context?
    Sadly, 'they' (the people living in the HMRP areas) have become the UK's fogotten people, living in empty communities, surrounded by empty houses and receiving empty promises from their local and national politicians!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • John Earnshaw

    @on my earlier posting - 'a paper I prepard for Hull City Council, entitled H.E.L.P. in Hull' - below is a copy for you all to read...and, which can be rolled out in all the other HMRP areas and will have the same effect!

    I hereby challenge any HA, HMRP or LA to have a go!

    H.E.L.P in Hull
    (Housing England’s Local People)

    Ten Point Action Plan

    1. Identify 10, 50, 100 or 200 (or any multiple of 10) long/medium term empty houses in reasonable condition – North Bransholme or similar*.

    2. First Phase - Offer for sale at £75,000 (or other suitable agreed local ‘market’ price) to local people only. Those who are first time buyers, who were born and still live in Hull. (Birth Certificate and/or Passport proof).

    3. Give each successful applicant a £25,000 Refurbishment/Renovation** grant on the property, of which two thirds is repayable if they leave the property before three years, half before five years and nothing to repay after 10 years.

    4. Hull City Council to have an ‘approved’ list of Hull ‘local’ contractors for supplying materials and carrying out the refurbishment works.

    5. All goods/materials must be purchased from ‘local’ traders based in Hull

    6. Second Phase – Opened up to former Hull residents (as in 2 above), who either work or have family connections in Hull and who wish to return to live in Hull. First time buyers first in queue.

    7. Third Phase – Opened up to anyone else who has some ‘local’ connection with Hull, or who would like to set up or who have set up a new business in Hull and who may not necessarily be first time buyers

    8. Successful applicants must start work on refurbishment within three months and be fully completed within six months

    9. Removals contractors and solicitors to be ‘local’ and only from HULL

    10. H.E.L.P scheme can be rolled out in the other eight MRP areas + the three areas beyond MRP.

    *‘Community Anchors’ to be identified as being in place or at least satisfactory
    ** Professor Anne Powers has indicated that it costs £19,000 to demolish a property

    Low Demand Project Manager
    The Empty Homes Agency
    10th June 2005

    Any questions, drop me a line!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Eva Silver

    I like to see the government so and tell the private owner want to read out your property then its got to be at the level to Social Housing not the other way around. People on limited incomes i.e. Minumum wages cannot afford this prices or your got to give people a Living Wages and the property than a private owner lets out got and I mean got to reach standards.

    Stop picking on the poor and pick on the people with the money and stop allowing private property to reach such peaks where the average man or woman on the street cannot afford to buy these property.

    Please do not tell people go on Shared Ownership some of these property worst that Council and Housing Association for Tenants and we sat us tenants to the issues these people have over internal and external repairs and I made a suggestions under Local Offers

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • With a gross spend of over £100,000 a property, this could have been one incredible renovation / improvement programme. If it had the legacy would have a good one. As it is, we are left with an ugly mess. New Homes Bonus and other small programmes offer some opportunities to create some positives out of the ashes, but it will take much more creative thinking than this programme offered.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

Related images



IH Subscription