Monday, 21 April 2014

BEDROOM TAX

Posted in: Need to Know | Ask the Experts

23/09/2012 11:19 am

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

Anonymous

Anonymous

24/09/2012 12:14 pm

The 'standard rental charges' sounds more like the maximum amount of Housing Benefit that will be paid in that area for each size of property - one bed, two bed and so on.

These have been in place for a long time but may have been different amounts int he past and are used currently in calculating Local Housing Allowance which is paid to private tenants. It's not an amount that has been set for landlords to charge.

For example, if I needed to claim I would be entitled to a one bedroom rate which in my area is/or will be a maximum of £250 per week. If I rent somewhere that costs more than that I would have to pay the difference. If I rent somewhere that costs less than £250 per week I would only get my actual rent amount paid not the maximum amount.

Social Housing rents should be quite a bit less than these standard amounts so there would be no reason to change the rent because of them.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

25/09/2012 1:40 pm

Hi Richard,

There are 3 different things too address from your query

1. The local housing allowance  is paid to private tenants not to housing association/council tenants. The amount is based on the bedrooms needed, bedsit/1 bed /2 bed etc. for each particular local authority area, so it can vary from one place to the other.

2. In time all housing association and council housing rents are meant to come into line and tenants would pay the same amount (i think it was meant to happen in 2016, but I am not sure where that plan is up to).

3. bedroom tax - if you claim housing benefit and live in a housing association property or council property and have a spare bedroom the housing benefit may be reduced by 14%, if you have 2 spare bedrooms it will be reduced by 25%.  If you are a tenant, I would contact your housing officer to ask for advice.

i hope this makes some of it clear.

G.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

jack jones

jack jones

Posts: 2

29/11/2012 9:01 pm

I feel that the coming changes that will come into effect fom April 2013 in housing benefit reductions will be detrimental to the Uk. The bedrrom tax is a drastic measure and will mean that those in homes with spare bedrooms will be penalised in having to find the shortfall, 14% for 1 bedroom unoccupied and 25% for 2 bedrooms. This is nothing short of a  bullying tactic to force people to move as previous meeasures ie, offering cash incentives to downsize have not worked.  There is also huge discrimination in this decision as some people will not be affected. Those to be affected are those that fall into the working age group ie, 16-61 years olds. It has been suggested that people can take in lodgers to help with this issue. How unethical is that? Do people want to take in strangers into their homes? Highly unlikely as it poses risks to people. Would Ian Dunken Smith be happy to have a stranger move into his home? If this country is in that much financial difficulty why are we giving 27 billion a year to other countries? Says it all really, jokers

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

30/11/2012 9:43 am

It's not that you can't have a spare bedroom anymore it's just that the taxpayer won't pay for it anymore when there's a housing crisis in this country from 1st April 2012.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

raindrop

raindrop

Posts: 50

30/11/2012 11:07 am

What good for Social Tenant should be good for MP's and Councillor's 

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

30/11/2012 12:19 pm

Not really they work so they may need somewhere additional to live/stay if they have to re-locate/commute a lot as part of the employment if it's cheeper than constantly paying for hotels for example. So it's not the same really is it. In fact it's not even relevant when you scratch beneath the surface.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

30/11/2012 4:11 pm

On the other hand, if an MP or Councillor claims HB then they will be liable for the underoccupation penalty; so yes it is "what good".

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

james cunningham

james cunningham

Posts: 4

30/11/2012 5:02 pm

 What happens when large numbers of tenants decide to move

to a smaller council home / will they then be given

 a short term  insecure tenancy  / or will they remain secure tenants ?

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

jack jones

jack jones

Posts: 2

02/12/2012 7:45 pm

Many people claiming housing benefit work. A third of housing benefit clamimants work but as a result of low pay claim HB. 47% of those in homes that have unoccupied bedrooms are not prepared to move so this bedroom tax will not work. Who can blame them as many tenants would have spent money decorating and improving their homes. This tax will also increase homelessness. What next? Tent tax? 

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Expert post

Mike Wilkins

Mike Wilkins

Posts: 45

12/12/2012 1:28 pm

Richard

From 1st April 2013, as one of the changes introduced by The Welfare Reform Act  the government will introduce the ‘bedroom tax’  for new and existing, working age housing benefit claimants living, in social housing. The effect of this proposed change is that residents may receive less housing benefit if they have spare bedrooms and may see a reduction of around  £11 a week for one ‘extra’ bedroom not used, or £20 with two, possibly more depending on where you live. The change will only apply if you are under 65 however. You mentioned the direct.gov web page and in case others want to look at it, see below.

https://www.dwpe-services.direct.gov.uk/portal/page/portal/bcc/lp?_piref300_60239_300_60238_60238.__ora_navig=currentPageToRender

You also mentioned valuations. The application of new rules means that the Local Housing Allowance (LHA),is now used to calculate HB for social housing tenants.  The Valuation Office Agency has a good web site which shows the LHA by borough and also has a separate LHA bedroom calculator which might help.

http://www.voa.gov.uk/

The object of the exercise, as far as the government is concerned, is to reduce the HB bill, and one way is to now apply the HB rules on ‘under occupation’ that currently apply to private sector tenants, to social housing tenants. I hope this helps.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Expert post

Adrian Waite

Adrian Waite

Posts: 28

12/12/2012 4:38 pm

The Direct Gov website includes a section called the ‘benefits adviser’ that allows people to calculate benefits including housing benefits. The site also includes links to housing benefit calculators on local authority websites.
There is obviously a difference between rent and housing benefit for social tenants and rent and housing benefit for private tenants.
Rents in England for social tenants are set by the local authority or housing association with reference to the government’s rent restructuring formula. This is not changing as a result of the government’s changes to welfare benefits. Rents will continue to increase to target levels in 2015 and by inflation plus 0.5% a year thereafter. In Scotland and Wales government influences rather than controls social rents but, as in England, social rents are lower than private rents and are increasing faster than inflation.
Rents in the private sector are set by the landlord at ‘market’ levels.
Housing Benefit for private tenants is based on the ‘Local Housing Allowance’. This is calculated with reference to ‘market’ rents but the government is changing the way that the formulas work to reduce the ‘Local Housing Allowance’. Tenants may find that their housing benefit no longer covers all their rent and will either have to pay the difference themselves or find a cheaper tenancy.
Housing Benefits for social tenants will not be affected by the government’s changes to ‘Local Housing Allowances’.
However, the under-occupation penalty (or bedroom tax) will apply to all tenants of working age who claim housing benefit. Tenants with one spare room will face a 14% reduction in benefits while those with two spare rooms will face a 25% reduction in benefits. The government states that this penalty is designed to discourage under-occupation at a time when there is a shortage of housing. Critics say that it is an unfair penalty because many of the 670,000 tenants who will be affected do not have a realistic option of moving to a smaller home.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From I am The Secret Housing Officer, 11/04/2014 9:49 am in new homeswap tenancies instead of inheriting previous tenants?

    Tenants of Registered Providers do not have a legal right to exchange unlike Secure Local Authority tenants who enjoy a Right to Exchange under the provisions of the Housing Act 1985. For tenants of RP's their rights reagrding exchanging will therefore be found in the detail of their contract (tenancy) with their landlord.

  • posted Anonymously, 10/04/2014 8:27 am in Signed new agreement, but mistake in rent

    No they shouldn't, they should build new homes or invest in current stock improvements

  • From Housing Troll, 09/04/2014 11:08 am in Joint Tenancy

    You are not being bullied, the council is fulfilling its legal duty, although perhaps they have not explained this well enough?

  • From Housing Troll, 04/04/2014 3:40 pm in Mutual Exchange Withholding of Consent to Exchange

    Yes. It may well be the case the son succeeded due to a legal or contractual term, depending on the tenancy agreement. Perhaps it was even a policy decision which did not take the adpatations into account (unlikley but possible). 

  • From Miss Muffett, 02/04/2014 2:47 pm in Help with challnege of Service Charges??

    Sorry, typo in title - should obviously be challenge!!

  • From Eve Steadman, 25/03/2014 6:51 am in Terrible service from housing assoc

    Further to my previous post: I would like to form a contact/pressure group of Metropolitan residents (South), which includes my own area, Cambridge. Please spread the word and provide ideas as to how all those residents may be contacted, and how we could establish communication independedently of this forum. Do many or any residents read Metropolitan's Facebook page?

  • From Macca57, 24/03/2014 4:10 pm in Tenancy succession

    Many thanks for your reply, much appreciated

  • posted Anonymously, 24/03/2014 10:29 am in Service Charge Increase Legal? Moral?

    Legal: It is alawys a mistake to think of change of service charge cost as an increase - is it the correct cost for the services provided? & are those costs reasonable (i.e. for the service you recieve are the costs in the right ball park)

  • posted Anonymously, 21/03/2014 4:31 pm in Please help... Mutual exchange

    Enlightening.

  • From H4rdwork, 21/03/2014 1:06 pm in HELP!! Working as a Housing Officer in Supported Living

    Sara, you'll impress if you show you've researched a topic and part of the job that's new to you, and ask intelligent questions about how that organisation manages risk, compared to your research.