Wednesday, 23 May 2012

CARELESS HOUSING ASSOCIATION

Posted in: Need to Know | Ask the Experts

19/12/2009 3:27 pm

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

19/12/2009 4:06 pm

No, no, no and no are the direct answers

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Junior

Junior

Posts: 649

19/12/2009 4:34 pm

Why is this Joe - why you saying no no no if you would be kind enough to explain I would be grateful.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

19/12/2009 4:57 pm

Eva, its nothing personal, its just that tenants do not have a right to the information you seek or such a breakdown of costs, or can you report them to anyone for what you 'think' they have done.

You are free to ask obviously, but the landlord is also free to say you cant have the information.

Housing associations are not subject to Freedom of Information requests, though even if they were a council landlord I doubt you would get the information you seek.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Posts: 104

19/12/2009 7:56 pm

Of course Joe could very well be one of those very consultants of which you speak Eva and of course it would not be in the interests of his "profession" if residents were able to get too much information on the costs and necessity of their services. Perhaps this is another one of those Marilyn Monroe "well he would say that wouldn't he?" moments...

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

19/12/2009 8:11 pm

This post has been removed.

Posts: 104

19/12/2009 9:36 pm

So are you not housing consultant "Joe Halewood, director of supported housing consultancy, HSM"

referred to on page 3 of:

http://www.supportsolutions.co.uk/docs/briefing4/news.pdf

Perhaps you are one of the very consultants Eva's HA is spending money on? Pray tell how much money does HSM make from the HA sector each year?

No need to get personal but clearly, we touched a nerve there...!

Back on topic, as you rightly say, HA's are sadly not covered under FoI rules but according to the Housing Corporation:

"You can also write to housing associations. Most try to be as open as possible and will provide you with information when they are able. The Housing Corporation requires housing associations to be accessible, accountable and transparent to residents and other stakeholders. The National Housing Federation Code of Governance states that associations should operate in an open and accountable manner by generally making information about their work available to their residents, local communities and other stakeholders."

Check out the full guidance at:

http://www.housingcorp.gov.uk/upload/pdf/FOIAInfoSheet.pdf

One assumes the TSA has now picked up this mandate from the old HC.


Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

john souray

john souray

Posts: 24

20/12/2009 9:22 am

ILAG: If Joe Halewood is a consultant, you can discover that because he posts here using his real name (as do I).

You, on the other hand, deliver your poisonous hate-mongering rants from behind the snivelling cowardly cover of a pseudonym.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

kass

kass

Posts: 629

20/12/2009 11:13 am

ILAG Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:36 GMT

Thansk for providing this info:

"You can also write to housing associations. Most try to be as open as possible and will provide you with information when they are able. The Housing Corporation requires housing associations to be accessible, accountable and transparent to residents and other stakeholders. The National Housing Federation Code of Governance states that associations should operate in an open and accountable manner by generally making information about their work available to their residents, local communities and other stakeholders."

Its spriti is great and fine. But what if the HA refuses to adehre by this code or goes about in in an unacceptable/unreasonable way?
What can a tenant do?
(Forget about complaint procedures as the HA's just fob you off there and forget taking them to court as tere is no legal aid)
The answer is the Housing Associations do exactly as they please and will give tenants information only how and when and if they wish to do so.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

20/12/2009 2:00 pm

Kass, ILAG has provide a copy of a 'code' but that is all it is a code and not any form of right. The Weaver case dismissed the HC code that all other eviction methods be tried before Ground 8 you will recall - a code far more important than a code of 'openness.'

Consultants are engaged by RSLs for many reasons (planning, pensions, other financial, environmental or even to prepare for a SP inspection) and much of this never impacts on tenants. Much of it is also commercially sensitive information and wont be released.

Where it does impact and a change of housing management or practice could follow, tenants do have rights to challenge and even complain - such rights are typically held in the tenancy agreement itself. Witness the recent resident warden cases as examples.

So keeping this on tenants 'rights' as Eva requested, its only when the impact of work undertaken by consultants affects tenants that their 'rights' kick in, and tenants have no rights to interogate their HA landlord on how it spends its money on consultants (or anything else or that matter) or what work any such consultants do for the HA.


Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Junior

Junior

Posts: 649

20/12/2009 2:11 pm

Joe its Eva while I understand you words. Us Resident do not like what going on all these Consultant's being employed at these Housing Association and we do not see report's. We have one at the moment number crunching figures pertaining to our Repairs but we do not see the real proof and evidence. Its these number crunching figures. Well I have no got a master's degree but I do have a master's degree in life.

I want them to be accountable and I want to know why we having all these Consultant's in and at the end of the day and what its costing us the Resident to employ such a Consultant.

Why when the Housing Association thinking about employing a Consultant the Resident's Group spoken to about the costs and ditto.



Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

20/12/2009 2:21 pm

Can one be outed if one publishes under ones own name?

Could ILAG be the head or ex-head (and can thing of better suffixes than 'ex') be Brian Potter of Islington Leaseholders Action Group? I suspect it is.

Frankly, I dont care who he is as it should be the case for anyone posting here, pseudonyms are allowed and thats fine. It should be the argument put forward and not who puts it forward that is debated.

It should also be the case that any potential conflict of interest factors into any debate and so ILAG is correct to raise that my being a consultant could affect my opinion. Just as I can venture to ask what does ILAG do with the £100k grant it takes from the council or his blind allegiance to RTB when he has benefitted financially from it.

By the way ILAG the link you give is interesting - id forgotten that prediction of mine from 2006 that has clearly come true, accommodation-based homeless services are down by 43% - Maybe i'll google myself and find out some more bon mots, but then again i dont think any such potential conceit would make me use the Royal "we" as you do above....or are you spouting positions on behalf of ILAG and not just yourself perhaps?



Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

kass

kass

Posts: 629

20/12/2009 2:38 pm

Joe Halewood Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:00 GMT

"...So keeping this on tenants 'rights' as Eva requested, its only when the impact of work undertaken by consultants affects tenants that their 'rights' kick in, and tenants have no rights to interogate their HA landlord on how it spends its money on consultants (or anything else or that matter) or what work any such consultants do for the HA. "

Exactly, HAs do exactly what they wish and there's very little tenants can do about it...
But tenants (and the whole british public) have certainly the right to say what they think HAs are up to.
And if these socla landlords do the wrong things (obviously would impact on tenants if they spend a huge amont of money and time on consultants and laywers and other initiatives, etc... this is either tenants money or public money being squandered) so someone somewhere has to control and check how their money is spent.
the problem tenants is that that any wrongdoings and misuse by social landlords is almost impossible to prove or impossible to take it up legally because there is no transparency and because tenants do not have the means to do so. In practice, even with all the regulations you might wish to quote, basically RLSs are laws unto themselves. After all what is good to have any right if you cannot enforce it.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

20/12/2009 4:53 pm

Eva - to attempt to answer your last question directly, why are residents groups not spoken with before a consultant or any other decision is taken by a landlord?

Firstly, HAs and RSLs have managers whose role is to manage. Their decisions are scrutinised and monitored by adequate regulation in the main.

Secondly, if they had a responsibility to consult with resident groups over every decision, they would be a commune not a social business. The costs of doing this would be astronomical and tenants would have to pay much higher rents to cover such costs.

Thirdly, and specifically a repairs service is likely to be contracted out these days and because of its value it will need to tendered under EU regulations. So, contracts for them come up for review every few years or so and this could be the reasons why consultants have been engaged, to advise on on the tendering process or it meets legal requirements (or many other reasons).

Of course thats speculation and they could be engaged for a number of reasons. Yet it also shows that consultants being engaged on a repairs issue need not be a reason for worry for tenants. It may well be reason to worry as well, but as i stated above HAs are fairly closely regulated on practices and spending. And if the potential impact on any proposed change is a change of management practice, then tenants and resident groups would be consulted and need to be.



Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Junior

Junior

Posts: 649

20/12/2009 8:46 pm

Firstly, HAs and RSLs have managers whose role is to manage. Their decisions are scrutinised and monitored by adequate regulation in the main.

Who's do that Joe do you mean the Board Management Team.

Secondly, if they had a responsibility to consult with resident groups over every decision, they would be a commune not a social business. The costs of doing this would be astronomical and tenants would have to pay much higher rents to cover such costs.

Joe if only are Careless Housing Association was acting accordingly.

I would be wasting my time and energy. I see all these Consultant's coming in our doors but nothing improves. Well what commerical business employes staff then goes and gets Consultant's in. Only I believe in my life is something going wrong. Well the company wouldn't stay afloating with all these Consultant's coming in the financial burden put break the company.

Well I for one want to see whom we are employing has Consultant's and want a breakdown of costs. I also want to know what Department is asking for a Consultant and I want to see a report to ensure she/he is value for money.

I just a little person a tenant but I cannot afford to be speaking to Solicitor's. Well lucky Careless Housing Association using our Rent Money to go and buy a good solicitor to fight us in court. Well all we have is government officer's and what I remember of the old days. These Officer's never got punished for not adhering to the rules and regulations. Like the bloody M.P.'s with all the perks of the job.

Well I want the Government to make this Careless Housing Association adhere to the Rules and Regulations and stop treating the Tenant's like fools and I think alot of people going to get a shock when you see must how much money going out the door on stupid Consultant's and please do not get me wrong I presume allot of you do go work. I see our Chief Executive wink at the Consultant and lots of Tenant's think must be related. Like our Director with he/she family member got a Contractor with the Housing Association. Well when the Contractor going to Declare his Interest

Well I going to ask my chair if we can have a Consultant in and to ensure this Housing Association is not pulling the wool over our eye's.

Our Careless Housing Association is every good at Poker???????

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sancho

Sancho

Posts: 199

21/12/2009 9:48 am

Eva, although you always refuse to name your landlord, I have two or three possibilities in mind all of whom use consultants. As far as I can ascertain, you are a tenant of one of the LSVT associations in Tower Hamlets. In most of these, they have consultants as the structure of the organisation when it was formed out of the Council did not contain certain HA functions and these have been filled by consultants in the interim until such time as they can attract and appoint permanent staff. Usually, these consultants deal with development and decent homes, there could be others looking at leasehold management and shred ownership marketing. Until the new HA is established they will find it hard to attract good quality permanent staff and consultants, who have no pensions, no holiday, no sick leave etc are a cost-effective interim measure.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

kass

kass

Posts: 629

21/12/2009 11:00 am

"Sancho Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:48 GMT
Eva, although you always refuse to name your landlord..."
I seem to recall that Eva is one of the brave tenants who has mentioned her landlord's names at least acouple of times.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sancho

Sancho

Posts: 199

21/12/2009 11:02 am

I can't find it, Kass. Do share.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

kass

kass

Posts: 629

21/12/2009 11:12 am

"Sancho Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:02 GMT

I can't find it, Kass. Do share."

No, in this particular case, I am not going to share. It would be a breach of net etiquette. Please ask EVa herself.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sancho

Sancho

Posts: 199

21/12/2009 11:27 am

I already did and never got an answer. It doesn't really matter anyway I guess. As I said, I have three possibilities in mind for who we could be talking about. One is very good, one is fairly good and one is terrible. I am trying to work out in my own mind whether Eva is struggling with the terrible one or whether there's some advice we can give her on how to best approach the issue if it's one of the better ones.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Junior

Junior

Posts: 649

21/12/2009 12:43 pm

Hi Sancho I am a Committee Member on one or more of the Resident Group. I didn't want to name and shame them because I presume may try and get me out under the Code of Contract or Conflict of Interest.

Our's doesn't seem to take on Consultant 's due to a lack of staff we have more than enought staff. If the staff was doing they job then we wouldn't need to have a consultant in.

I like them to proof to us Resident's that the Consultant's taking on are needed for this and that. I believe we should be told by way of a report quartely how many Consultant's and why needed and the cost and what they done was relevant.

We had More than just a Landlord last year. Two Consultant's well no report was put to the Resident Group's and we been asking via a Resident Group called the Way Forward Group and still we have not got the report and how much these two Consultant's cost the Housing Association via us Resident's paying our rent.




Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Rate this topic

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From Nic Bliss, 22/05/2012 9:28 am in Resident-led Scrutiny Reports

    There is not a right or wrong way to do Resident Scrutiny Reports.  The key issue is what will best lead to outcomes that bring improvements for tenants and prospective tenants.  If a key reason to involve tenants in involvement activities, including scrutiny exercises, is so that they can constructively challenge how the landlord operates so that services, value for money or other aspects of the business can be improved, then not allowing tenants to raise the points they wish to raise would seem to be counter productive and not using the potential business advantages that tenant involvement can ...

  • posted Anonymously, 21/05/2012 4:44 pm in What is Social Housing there for...

    Oh well, that's a surprise! I had a theoretical stab at this topic (anonymous 14/5) and it turns out that I pretty much anticipated Government policy

  • posted Anonymously, 21/05/2012 11:56 am in My Housing Officer is very unhelpful

    I had a problem with a tree... I complained for more than 12 years  to the housing officers, many of them, their managers, their directors, their complaint department of the housing trust... It was so blatant how many problems this tree created, like covering up completely a neigbours window, entirely covered my small garden, you could not stand under it because of continued pollination, it's roots making the garden uncultivable, its shoots everywhere, crows and other big birds all over it fighting and cawing... you will not believe how many times i had to write, how many experts the ...

  • From Sparkle47, 18/05/2012 10:12 pm in Rules on assignment

    Thank you both for your responce. I'm a bit worried about under occupancy, as it's a 2 bed flat, but at lest we know its all overbroad. :)

  • From Will Nixon, 17/05/2012 6:17 pm in What defines a 'living' room

    The crux of the issue is whether the property is deemed to be "more extensive" than required and the criteria will be contained in the Landlord's own policies and procedures.

  • From Shaun Aldis, 17/05/2012 11:13 am in Repairs ban

    There are a few factors to consider, which are dependent upon what is in the tenancy agreement by type of tenancy i.e. social landlord or private lease. Normally the landlord is responsible for repairs unless stated otherwise and they should be carried out within a reasonable period of time, however again unless stated there are no fixed time limits, and the length of time considered to be reasonable would depend on the type and severity of the repair.  Most landlords will normally undertake repairs once they have been notified about them, however if they refuse or fail to do ...

  • From Paul Jones, 16/05/2012 11:04 pm in Tenancy status and mutual exchanges.

    Those with lifetime (periodic) tenacies swapping with another person with the same will still swap using a "Deed of Assignment" and take over eachother's tenancies, not begin new tenancies.  BUT, if fixed-term or "affordable rent" is involved on either side, new tenancies are started. I have studied the Localism Bill and this is what it says.

  • From Blair Mcpherson, 16/05/2012 1:01 pm in Why be a tweet

    I have recently joined twitter. I was initially reluctant but my son was very enthusiastic saying it was better than Facebook because it was easier to use, wasn't restricted to your " friends" and the limit on characters keeps comments short and to the point. For me twitting is a way to promote my articles and books to let others who share my interests know what is influencing me and to pick up on what others in my areas of interest are talking about. Of course I am not immune to the temptation to follow the trend.

  • From Shaun Aldis, 16/05/2012 12:54 pm in Fire risk or not?

    Where there's any question about the performance of a product, I would suggest that it's important to get the products in question back to the manufacturer or importer, for them to inspect them and advise you as to the cause of the damage. This response can then guide and feed into your risk analysis. This should be channeled through your product supplier, be that a wholesaler, distributor, or trade supplier. My experience of this is that the quality of manufacturers responses will be improved if details about the installed conditions, fault levels, cable run distance, Amperage/kW loading, and nature ...

  • From Matt Murdock, 16/05/2012 9:42 am in London Housing Assocition not building Social Housing -WHY??

    In short the powers are devolved by government to the Mayor and, in London, the GLA will take on the role previously undertaken by the Homes and Communities Agency.