Wednesday, 23 May 2012

closure order

Posted in: Need to Know | Ask the Experts

29/01/2011 9:43 pm

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

Junior

Junior

Posts: 649

29/01/2011 10:43 pm

Do you not have Landlord Insurance has you are the Landlady and should cover the costs of a Solicitor under ditto  but without seeing the policy and what cover is hard to say.  Perhap 24 hours hotline with your Insurance Company

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

31/01/2011 10:56 am

Caveat Emptor

A closure order does what it says, closes the property for three months. As the owner, you have to stand the cost of lost rent, boarding up etc etc.

Sorry, there is not really a simple answer to this, apart form the obvious of ensuring that your tenants adhere to the terms and conditions of thier tenancy, and serve S21 notice if they dont

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

31/01/2011 12:06 pm

Usha

The Act does make allowances for 'authorised persons' (i.e. someone authorised by the chief officer of police) to have 'reasonable excuse' to enter a property which is under a Closure Order. However, it does note that this would be for 'essential maintenance or repairs', however I would imagine that as long as the police, or whoever went with them, were satisfied that the property was safe, you may struggle.

You mention that you taken legal action to recover possession of the property, you may be able to argue for access to assess any potential damage, but it doesn't look like the Act allows even that, let alone renovation work.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Morse

Morse

Location: London
Posts: 12

31/01/2011 1:21 pm

Usha

When the police spoke to you about this prior to serving the Notice, did you not think to take legal action?  There is a way out of this, which your solicitors will be able to advise you of.  In the meantime, you should count yourself lucky that the police aren't seeking to recover their costs from you, and write off the lost rent. 

Presumably you knew about the problems, but were content to allow them to continue unabated...?

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Expert post

Abimbola  Badejo

Abimbola Badejo

Posts: 101

31/01/2011 11:03 pm

There is provison in the act for you as owner to apply to discharge the closure order. That is probably the best course for you to take at the moment given that all other options have not produced the desired result for you. The earlier you make the application the better. Your solicitors should be able to give you advise on how to go about making an application to discharge the closure order. The nuisance residents are gone and you have obtained a possession order. It seems to me that the continuation of the closure order serves no useful purpose and ought to be discharged.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From Nic Bliss, 22/05/2012 9:28 am in Resident-led Scrutiny Reports

    There is not a right or wrong way to do Resident Scrutiny Reports.  The key issue is what will best lead to outcomes that bring improvements for tenants and prospective tenants.  If a key reason to involve tenants in involvement activities, including scrutiny exercises, is so that they can constructively challenge how the landlord operates so that services, value for money or other aspects of the business can be improved, then not allowing tenants to raise the points they wish to raise would seem to be counter productive and not using the potential business advantages that tenant involvement can ...

  • posted Anonymously, 21/05/2012 4:44 pm in What is Social Housing there for...

    Oh well, that's a surprise! I had a theoretical stab at this topic (anonymous 14/5) and it turns out that I pretty much anticipated Government policy

  • posted Anonymously, 21/05/2012 11:56 am in My Housing Officer is very unhelpful

    I had a problem with a tree... I complained for more than 12 years  to the housing officers, many of them, their managers, their directors, their complaint department of the housing trust... It was so blatant how many problems this tree created, like covering up completely a neigbours window, entirely covered my small garden, you could not stand under it because of continued pollination, it's roots making the garden uncultivable, its shoots everywhere, crows and other big birds all over it fighting and cawing... you will not believe how many times i had to write, how many experts the ...

  • From Sparkle47, 18/05/2012 10:12 pm in Rules on assignment

    Thank you both for your responce. I'm a bit worried about under occupancy, as it's a 2 bed flat, but at lest we know its all overbroad. :)

  • From Will Nixon, 17/05/2012 6:17 pm in What defines a 'living' room

    The crux of the issue is whether the property is deemed to be "more extensive" than required and the criteria will be contained in the Landlord's own policies and procedures.

  • From Shaun Aldis, 17/05/2012 11:13 am in Repairs ban

    There are a few factors to consider, which are dependent upon what is in the tenancy agreement by type of tenancy i.e. social landlord or private lease. Normally the landlord is responsible for repairs unless stated otherwise and they should be carried out within a reasonable period of time, however again unless stated there are no fixed time limits, and the length of time considered to be reasonable would depend on the type and severity of the repair.  Most landlords will normally undertake repairs once they have been notified about them, however if they refuse or fail to do ...

  • From Paul Jones, 16/05/2012 11:04 pm in Tenancy status and mutual exchanges.

    Those with lifetime (periodic) tenacies swapping with another person with the same will still swap using a "Deed of Assignment" and take over eachother's tenancies, not begin new tenancies.  BUT, if fixed-term or "affordable rent" is involved on either side, new tenancies are started. I have studied the Localism Bill and this is what it says.

  • From Blair Mcpherson, 16/05/2012 1:01 pm in Why be a tweet

    I have recently joined twitter. I was initially reluctant but my son was very enthusiastic saying it was better than Facebook because it was easier to use, wasn't restricted to your " friends" and the limit on characters keeps comments short and to the point. For me twitting is a way to promote my articles and books to let others who share my interests know what is influencing me and to pick up on what others in my areas of interest are talking about. Of course I am not immune to the temptation to follow the trend.

  • From Shaun Aldis, 16/05/2012 12:54 pm in Fire risk or not?

    Where there's any question about the performance of a product, I would suggest that it's important to get the products in question back to the manufacturer or importer, for them to inspect them and advise you as to the cause of the damage. This response can then guide and feed into your risk analysis. This should be channeled through your product supplier, be that a wholesaler, distributor, or trade supplier. My experience of this is that the quality of manufacturers responses will be improved if details about the installed conditions, fault levels, cable run distance, Amperage/kW loading, and nature ...

  • From Matt Murdock, 16/05/2012 9:42 am in London Housing Assocition not building Social Housing -WHY??

    In short the powers are devolved by government to the Mayor and, in London, the GLA will take on the role previously undertaken by the Homes and Communities Agency.