Thursday, 24 May 2012

Councils being sued

Posted in: Discussion | Care and support

02/02/2009 10:50 pm

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

lowrider

lowrider

Posts: 18

04/03/2009 11:12 am

An area that i to have noticed and wondered on why it was not addressed.
Often it seems the focus on such things is driven my central goverenment and they are subjected to heavy canvassing by the more vocal "rights" groups.
Something that male domestic voilence do not seem to have.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

04/03/2009 12:39 pm

My main point is not against government - local or national - but the fact that the EQUALITY and HUMAN RIGHTS commission cant see past the ends of their noses. Aren't men as equal as women? Aren't men entitled to the same human rights as women?
These two 'bloody obvious' points have been missed by the EHRC and whether the power of the womens DV lobby or any other lobby has anything to do with is immaterial.
The EHRC has done itself a massive disservice here and unless it acknowledges this and quickly it loses all credibility as it cannot claim to be equal or have any semblance of inequality that the lack of provision for male victims of DV - by comparison with female provision - makes clear

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

lowrider

lowrider

Posts: 18

05/03/2009 11:33 am

I agree with all your points.
But as with everything nothing is as simple.
The present inequality is a result of many factors, though the pressure groups for women’s rights and the PC brigade are I feel a major factor.
If the problem is to be addressed then we need to know how it came about and combat any bias.
The best tool in that war is to use publicity to shame them into answering “why” has this not been examined and act on it.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sandra Martin

Sandra Martin

Posts: 24

14/03/2009 12:09 pm

Surely not only the incidence of DV amongst men and women would have to be looked at to make comparisons. The women concerned might not be working in paid employment being at home with the kids which would make it very difficult for them to break away. Men who work on the other hand (and earn more) for example, are at an advantage. All is not equal when looking at the stats for DV and therefore more thorough research has to be carried out- and I am sure that this has been done.
Only men discussing this.......

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

16/03/2009 9:40 am


The point that everyone is missing here is obvious. THE foremost body on EQUALITY in the UK are themselves guilty of blatant inequality. By threatening to sue councils for not having enough DV provision for women, they miss the fact that women have 100 times the amount of provision that men fleeing DV have. (300+ refuges to about 3) The ‘great and the good’ of such ‘equality’ agencies should be ashamed of this and shamed about it.

That is not only ironic, it also shows just how embedded is the view that domestic violence is all about men hitting women. Yet this is clearly not the case as the crimes committed by women against men show. Crime is what DV is and the fact that it was recorded that 102 women and 38 men died at the hands of their partners proves this. We are talking murder and death here. Yet (a) all the provision is for women and that is an outrage and a disgrace, and (b) even the foremost EQUALITY specialists (allegedly) still only see DV as women being victims, men as perpetrators and men NOT as victims - That also is a disgrace and an outrage.

The issues about whether women or men have more chance to flee and other arguments are so insignificant in comparison with these two points. In no other area does society allow the safety of human beings to be so unsafe as it does toward men as victims of ‘domestic’ violence.

Even if all the women and men killed in DV statistics are all committed by men it is still a national disgrace that we have a chronic undersupply of support provision for them.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sandra Martin

Sandra Martin

Posts: 24

16/03/2009 10:35 am

Have you not noticed that the services that are available actually work to exist for themselves and therefore may as well not exist. The ones that are not available, well, good luck with that one.
Don't be silly, the 'Equalities Commision' does not exist for people experiencing discrimination but to ensure that the stats are available for government to claim they are doing something.....
Do not imajine for one minute that anyone is there to help- unless you have buckets full of money that is.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Joe Halewood

Joe Halewood

Posts: 243

16/03/2009 12:24 pm

No - You misconstrue my point. I dont for one minute believe the EHRC exists for vulnerable people. I do know that it is a powerful supposedly independent agency that does have influence with government, local and national.
They have been very silly indeed by lodging this campaign as all it does is expose their own ignorance of equality.
But again the added point is this - if they, who are so regarded and hitherto respected, miss the point that there is a chronic lack of provision for men, by concentrating on easy public arguments they perpetuate the myth that only women suffer DV. Meanwhile men are dying because of the perpetuation of that myth and b****r all is being done to recognise that the problem exists let alone doing anything about it!

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

29/07/2011 11:43 pm

Is this for real? The struggles abuse and degradation women have endured for centuries with no rights or legislation and within one century of them having legislation seen to be giving them rights, you want them granted without struggle....poor you! 

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Jono

Jono

Location: England
Posts: 54

30/07/2011 4:43 am

Anon,

Your comment is inhumane. How could you wish upon one group of individuals, a struggle to free themselves of abuses, when by your own admission you understand the nature of that which must be endured.

Refuges funded by the state for victims of DV I support; though it does seem to me unfair that those who perpetrate DV are allowed to go free. They clearly are a danger to at least one member of society, and so should be treated accordingly and detained.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From Alan Leach, 24/01/2012 3:12 pm in New definition for housing related support

    So this is what Mr Cameron meant by less beaurocracy when he talked about the Big society

  • From Joe Halewood, 18/11/2011 8:10 am in The future of sheltered and supported housing??

    I agree that a near 40% cut in SP wont be the worst.  However, Derby City Council needs to make £1.6m per year cuts for the entire Adult Health and Housing Department (budget of £74m) but is cutting £3.4m per year from the SP budget.

  • posted Anonymously, 17/11/2011 2:21 pm in DOCUMENTARY SERIES LOOKING TO HELP HOARDERS WITH THEIR PROBLEM

    Will hoarders be exempt the no extra room rule on account of their illness?

  • From TC, 14/09/2011 10:52 pm in Proxy Bidding on CBL sites

    Sorry if I am missing the obvious, but if you are the allocated case worker for your client, why would you not use their log-in to bid on their behalf.  Surely you would want to create a bid history for their application, whilst also being able to maintain the information on the application?

  • From Chris, 06/09/2011 3:31 pm in Taking responsibility & preparing tenants for social/private tenancies

    People may benefit from tenant training - understanding the responsibilities of the tenancy, tenancy rights etc, but these are best done at sign up.

  • posted Anonymously, 15/08/2011 1:27 pm in Target Hardening for Domestic Abuse

    Look on Housemark or ask Circle Anglia for their procedures and measures - that will lead you to a number of good resources.

  • From Jono, 30/07/2011 4:43 am in Councils being sued

    Anon,

  • From Sidney Webb, 17/02/2011 5:06 pm in Funding Future Support?

    Chris - housing providers are there to provide housing. It is for local authorities to fund or enable support for people, including tenants. There is no requirement for RSLS to continue to fund support that they have ended up doing, and indeed there is a strong moral argument to cause the State, or the Big Society to pay its' own bills rather than continue to expect the tenants to plug the shortfall.

  • From Joe Halewood, 08/09/2009 2:21 pm in Domestic violence

    Its taken 40 years of concerted lobbying with public acceptance of the need for womens refuges and associated services. They are still oversubscribed and insufficient in mumber.

  • From Joe Halewood, 12/01/2009 11:39 am in Supporting People - the legacy

    If as central government maintain the 200,000 fall in vulnerable people support is largely due to ineligible care, then surely they have a record of what happened to these vulnerable people. If not do central government care about vulnerable people needing care?