Saturday, 19 April 2014

Campaigners force judicial review of HMR fund

A campaign group has won the right to a judicial review of the government’s decision to allocate £35.5 million to help councils hit by the closure of the housing market renewal programme.

In the High Court this week Mrs Justice Lang ruled in favour of Save Britain’s Heritage saying the group ‘is entitled to have its claim considered in a full judicial review and this is in the public interest’. The judicial review is expected in January.

In November 2011 the Communities and Local Government department allocated £35.5 million to 13 of the areas worst hit by the closure of the £2.25 billion HMR programme. The money, which was match funded by councils, was intended to bring homes back into use.

It subsequently emerged councils were intending to spend around 98 per cent of the money on demolition. Save argued this was not the original intention of the fund, and the government had acted unlawfully in approving the bids.

The government has conceded the money was allocated unlawfully, but argued there was no point in taking the case to judicial review as most of the money has already been spent.

Barrister James Eadie said it would be ‘futile and wasteful to spend public money litigating a claim that has been overtaken by events’.

Save argued only around half the money has been spent, and as many of the buildings acquired using the funds have not yet been demolished it could instead be spent on refurbishment.

Following the judge’s decision to allow a judicial review, Save has written to the 13 authorities suggesting it would be ‘imprudent’ of them to spend any more of the money until after the case has been heard.

Clem Cecil, director of Save, said: ‘We hope this will steel Mr Pickles’ resolve to help residents still in the grip of an extremely destructive policy.’

A CLG spokesperson said: ‘We cannot comment on matters subject to legal proceedings.’

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters



  • CLG told to put a stop to demolition or face court


    Campaign group Save Britain’s Heritage has threatened further legal action against the government if the number of homes earmarked for demolition in housing market renewal areas is not reduced.

  • Campaigners turn to Pickles to halt demolition

    24 July 2013

    A campaign group has vowed to appeal to the communities secretary calling for a public inquiry into a controversial decision to allow a housing association to demolish homes in 12 streets in Liverpool.

  • Hollow victory


    Despite a legal victory, anti-demolition campaigners look set to be left disappointed

  • Council expected to approve controversial scheme

    23 July 2013

    Councillors are today expected to approve a controversial scheme to demolish 439 homes in the Welsh Streets area of Liverpool.

  • CLG puts Welsh Streets plans on hold

    24 July 2013

    A housing association’s plans to regenerate the Welsh Streets area of Liverpool have been put on hold by the government just hours after councillors approved the proposals.


  • The cost-cutting continues


    More cuts to legal aid will further limit tenants’ ability to bring cases to court, says Ole Hansen, partner at Hansen Palomares Solicitors

  • The price is right


    Legal reforms should reduce the cost of going to court, says Anna-Liisa Blanks-Walden, senior associate at Clarke Willmott

  • Staying power


    By providing a range of services from discounted furniture to advice on everything from welfare to energy, one social enterprise is enabling tenants to avoid debt and stay in their home for longer. Louise Hunt reports.

  • The full wait of the law


    Probationary tenants can now use good behaviour as a defence against eviction, says Jonathan Hulley, partner at Clarke Willmott

  • Unanswered questions


    Private tenants cannot be certain whether article 8 applies in possession cases, says Justin Bates, barrister at Arden Chambers