Sunday, 20 April 2014

Fed demands changes to green deal design

The government needs to do more to make its flagship green deal energy efficiency scheme work for social tenants, the National Housing Federation has said.

Responding to a consultation on the green deal and energy company obligation, which was published earlier this week, the NHF said it will put pressure on ministers to ensure the final design of the scheme makes it accessible to the sector.

Under the green deal households will be able to get work done to improve the energy efficiency of their home at no up front cost. The money will be paid back over 25 years through savings on fuel bills.

Subsidy will be available through the £1.3 billion a year energy company obligation to allow more expensive measures to be fitted that would not otherwise meet the green deal ‘golden rule’. This states that repayments must not exceed fuel bill savings.

Some of the details revealed in the consultation are concerning for social landlords. It states the government is considering excluding social landlords from one element of ECO – affordable warmth funding to tackle fuel poverty – which is expected to make up 25 per cent of the total pot.

The remaining 75 per cent will be for hard-to-treat properties, and the proposal is to restrict this subsidy to installations including solid wall insulation. The age of most social housing stock means this will be of limited value to the sector.

David Orr, chief executive of the NHF, said: ‘We will be arguing strongly both that social landlords should have access to the fuel poverty element of subsidy, since fuel poverty has a higher prevalence in social housing than any other tenure.

‘We will also be stressing  that the carbon reduction element of subsidy should not be limited to a narrow definition of solid wall stock, but should be open to any build type which is expensive to make energy efficient.’

Questions have also been raised about how attractive the green deal will be to consumers. The impact assessment on the scheme states interest rates on loans are likely to be between six and eight per cent. Research carried out by the Great British Refurb campaign in 2010 found just 7 per cent of the public would take up the green deal if rates were set at 6 per cent or higher.

Yesterday chief secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander announced the government is setting aside £200 million to pay for an ‘introductory offer’ on the green deal. Decisions on how to use the funding will made in the new year, although energy secretary Chris Huhne has already said cash back payments of up to £150 will be available.

Inside Housing is calling for social landlords to be given fair access to ECO funding through our Green Light campaign

Readers' comments (1)

  • There is a greater frequency of occurence of fuel poverty in social housing than amongst owner occupiers http://ow.ly/i/m52Z, so it is clearly unfair to exclude social housing from the Affordable Warmth element of the ECO while expecting this group to contribute to the cost of the subisdy via their fuel bills.

    Similarly, I agree that it is not simply solid wall insulation which is a solution to hard to treat homes. It may be very difficult to implement solid wall insulation (e.g. because of planning restrictions around heritage buildings or where some leaseholders in a block of flats will not consent to solid wall insulation).

    Off the top of my head, retrofitting communal or district heating into electrically heated high rise blocks or dense urban areas with high heritage value (e.g. central London which has done badly out of CERT and CESP because the measures promoted by these earlier incarnations of the supplier obligation are not well suited to the housing stock) could be as cost effective as SWI and will ensure that more people living in hard to treat properties can benefit from ECO.

    ECO will create an artificial market for carbon saving. If some measures suitable for hard to treat homes are not properly incorporated into ECO, the artificial market will not look to deliver them meaning that people living in millions of homes requiring such measures which are potentially as cost effective as SWI are effectively shut out of the potential benefit of ECO while still contributing to the cost of the scheme.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Related

Articles

  • ECO: Up the ambition

    11 April 2014

    The government should take a lesson from its 1666 predecessor about being ambitious, says Matthew O’Connell

  • MPs warn ECO will not tackle fuel poverty

    30 July 2013

    An influential committee of MPs has warned the government’s £1.3 billion-a-year energy company obligation will not succeed in tackling fuel poverty.

  • Energy efficiency measures to ‘significantly lower'

    13 February 2014

    Cuts to part of the energy company obligation - the pot of money set aside by energy companies to fund energy saving work on ‘hard-to-treat’ homes - could be 70 per cent, much higher than expected.

  • On the line

    15/11/2013

    The future of the energy company obligation is in jeopardy as politicians come under pressure to curb rising energy bills. So is ECO worth saving? Inside Housing and Mears Energy surveyed social landlords to find out. Jess McCabe reports

  • The end is nigh for ECO

    13 February 2014

    Proposed cuts to the energy company obligation have thrown social landlords’ retrofit plans into disarray. Nick Duxbury reveals just how bad the impact is likely to be - and it’s much worse than you thought

Resources

  • Green guru - future proofing

    24/05/2013

    In a time of financial restraint, it is only by trialling and analysing the various funding schemes and retrofit approaches available that asset managers can successfully future-proof their social housing stock, says John Barnham

  • The rise of the bungalow

    24/05/2013

    Britain needs more bungalows, according to a new report. Here, Richard Baines examines if single-storey homes can ever be a sustainable - rather than simply popular - housing solution

  • Strength in numbers

    24/05/2013

    A housing co-operative in Leeds has created a one-of-a-kind affordable eco-community for residents. Jess McCabe reports

  • Energy efficient

    10 May 2013

    Landlords should carefully consider energy efficient offers that are likely to come their way, says Patrick Sweeney

  • The cost-cutting continues

    31/05/2013

    More cuts to legal aid will further limit tenants’ ability to bring cases to court, says Ole Hansen, partner at Hansen Palomares Solicitors