Thursday, 24 April 2014

Landlords to be forced to improve energy efficiency

The government is planning to use building regulations as a means of increasing take-up of its flagship retrofit scheme, the green deal when it is introduced in October.

The long-awaited consultation on building regulations announced by junior housing minister Andrew Stunell yesterday revealed that the government plans to make landlords undertaking extensions to their homes also carry out energy efficiency works at the same time.

It plans to extend and expand the requirements around consequential improvements in existing buildings where they are ‘technically, functionally and economically feasible’.

The energy efficiency works would be mandatory for all extensions and for the replacement of controlled services or fittings, meaning the replacement of a boiler or a percentage of windows.

Under the £14 billion green deal programme households will be able to receive energy efficiency works on their homes at no upfront cost and then private sector companies will recoup the costs through the resulting savings.

Although the works that will be required by building regulations will not be explicitly tied to the green deal, they would be made available under green deal finance.

Landlords will have to ensure they spend at least 10 per cent of the cost of the planned works on the energy improvement work – however the government hopes they will exceed this by using green deal finance, and, potentially energy company obligation subsidy funding.

Around 200,000 extensions and conversions are carried out a year and the government argues these works increase energy use which should be mitigated across the home.

Mr Stunell claimed the new building regulations would save over £63 million a year for businesses by cutting red-tape and deliver safer and more sustainable buildings.

He added that when the amendments come into force next year, more energy efficient homes could save householders more than £150 a year on energy bills compared with homes being built in May 2010.

Mr Stunell said: ‘The coalition is committed to being the greenest government ever, so improving the energy efficiency of our existing buildings through the green deal, and ensuring that all new homes are zero carbon by 2016 is a top priority.

‘But we need to do this in a way that doesn’t add to the regulatory burden on businesses. So I’m delighted that these much need changes will provide guidance that is both fit for purpose and will cut carbon emissions, whilst also saving money for house holders and businesses alike.’

Readers' comments (19)

  • F451

    I may be wrong, but wouldn't these regulations simply bring back into action the regulations Mr Shapps scrapped previously in his bumfight of the quangos, or was it the recolouring of red-tape exercise, I get confused?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • '' The energy efficiency works would be mandatory,including the replacement of a boiler''.

    This is what I was worried about,I want no part of the green deal,yet it would seem that I would 'have' to take part,in order to have a new boiler fitted,in the future.

    So my recent suggestion that tenants will pay twice for heating systems will come true then,once via decent homes,and again via the green deal?.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "So my recent suggestion that tenants will pay twice for heating systems will come true then,once via decent homes,and again via the green deal?"

    I refer the honourable gentleman to my recent post explaining quite lucidly that he did not, as he suggests, pay for his decent homes works.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Actually, whilst I'm on the subject, are you planning an extension Dennis?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Deacon,I enclose part of your reply to me ref this issue,
    ''Tenants do not pay for DHS works. These are funded by your landlord''

    Who funds the landlord :)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick Campbell

    Dennis -- we the tenants fund our landlord (leaseholders fund the landlord too but in comparison they provide little funding).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • OK Rick I know,was just trying to make the point that we tenants already pay for the maintenance and,once in a blue moon replacement, of our heating system via our rent.

    I am concerned that in the future,we may be forced into the green deal,in order to maintaine our heating systems.

    To me,that would be paying twice,for a service.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Jono

    Dennis - who funds the mortgage :)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick Campbell

    Got you now I think Dennis

    --- if the boiler had to be replaced as a repair then it wouldn''t have anything to do with the green deal would it?

    --- when there is a housing association improvement programme (following ISVT) then that wouldn't fall into the green deal either, thus being funded via rents?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • ''if the boiler had to be replaced as a repair then it wouldn''t have anything to do with the green deal would it?''

    It certainly should not do Rick,but,in the future,what if a landlord would not replace/repair a heating system,and refered the tenant to the green deal scheme,or to put it another way,pay for it yourself,via your energy bill.

    If my landlord will maintain my system,up to the standard it is now,in return for the rent I pay,that is fine with me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters



  • Where's the logic?

    25 October 2013

  • Government reveals cash incentives to boost green deal

    19 February 2014

    The government has today announced a series of cash incentives to boost the take-up of its ailing green deal retrofit programme.

  • Plans to slash green measures branded 'perverse'

    2 December 2013

    Green campaign groups have hit out at ‘perverse’ government plans to slash the amount of green measures energy companies must pay for in an attempt to offset rising fuel bills.

  • Zero carbon target 'still feasible'

    1 August 2013

    Sustainability experts say the government’s target for making all homes zero carbon by 2016 can still be reached despite a six-month delay in the implementation of amendments to building regulations.

  • The end of the affair


    Social housing’s relationship with the green deal looks set to be short-lived as, just seven months in, landlords cite irreconcilable differences with the flagship scheme. Nick Duxbury reports


  • Green guru - future proofing


    In a time of financial restraint, it is only by trialling and analysing the various funding schemes and retrofit approaches available that asset managers can successfully future-proof their social housing stock, says John Barnham

  • How to... cut red tape


    The government is right to cut overlapping housing standards but it must be careful not to chop rules that make houses sustainable, says the UK Green Building Council’s Paul King

  • Bringing a post office back into the community


    Much to the delight of the local people, Scottish Borders Housing Association has opened a Post Office at its headquarters in Bannerfield, the first ever branch outside a retail unit. Maria Brett reports on the initiative

  • The price is right


    Legal reforms should reduce the cost of going to court, says Anna-Liisa Blanks-Walden, senior associate at Clarke Willmott

  • Put out the red light


    Violence, sex work and drug dealing were blighting one east London estate. In response, the landlord and police brought in the vice squad. Pavan Amara investigates whether it made a difference