Tuesday, 01 September 2015

Groups united in opposition to benefit cuts

The government’s proposed cuts to housing benefit have come under fire from all sides, with charities, industry bodies and trade unions all voicing their opposition to the plans.

What's the benefit logo

In a submission to the work and pensions select committee inquiry into the changes, charity body Homeless Link says the government will not save money through the cuts.

It warns that the plan to dock housing benefit by 10 per cent from claimants who have been on Jobseeker’s Allowance for more than a year will cost the state £3.3 billion annually, rather than producing a saving.

The charity used figures from the National Housing Federation warning that 202,000 people will be at risk of homelessness if the coalition government’s plans to cut the housing benefit bill go ahead.

Its submission says that even if only half of those at risk of homelessness from the changes ended up on the streets, the knock-on effects would still cost the state £1.7 billion annually.

‘There is no logical or moral justification for linking a person’s housing costs to the price of sausages and net curtains.’

Ian Fletcher, director of policy, BPF

The Trades Union Congress warned the changes to jobseeker’s allowance would cost 200,000 unemployed people £500 a year, in its submission to the inquiry.

The British Property Federation’s submission warns the cuts are a ‘recipe for destitution’, and could force hundreds of thousands of people to leave their homes and jobs.

It says families on local housing allowance may be priced out of areas with the most employment opportunities once government caps to the amount of housing benefit payable come into force from next April.

The federation estimates there are more than 400,000 new claimants who will be hit by the changes, and that a further 400,000 people already in work and claiming the benefit will be priced out of their homes.

Ian Fletcher, director of policy, said: ‘Reform is needed, but yet more piecemeal changes to local housing allowance are just making a flawed system worse.’

The BPF also criticises the plan to link housing benefit to the consumer price index, rather than the higher retail price index. Its submission points to evidence from the Treasury which shows rents grow at a higher rate than CPI.

Earlier this week housing charity Shelter published research commissioned from the University of Cambridge showing the housing benefit cuts will push an extra 27,000 families into poverty.

The charity questioned how the policy was compatible with the government’s aim of ending child poverty by 2020. Chief executive Campbell Robb said: ‘It’s hard to see how the government plans to lift children out of poverty when one of its first big reforms threatens the futures of thousands of children who are already living on a knife edge.’

Inside Housing is running a campaign calling on the government to find a fairer way to reduce housing benefit costs. Our petition on the subject has been signed by 1,159 people.

Readers' comments (21)

Comments are only open to subscribers of Inside Housing

Already a subscriber?

If you’re already a subscriber to Inside Housing, your subscription may not be linked to your online account. You can link your subscription from within the My Account section of the website and clicking on Link My Account.

Not yet a subscriber?

If you don't yet subscribe to Inside Housing, please visit our subscription page to view our various subscription packages.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

Related

Articles

  • Drop in opposition to green belt development

    3 August 2015

    A smaller proportion of people appear to be opposed to development of the green belt than 10 years ago, a poll commissioned by a campaign group has shown.

  • United front

    9 June 2015

    The sector must work together to limit the harm extending the Right to Buy could do, says Matthew Taylor

  • United Welsh secure £50m private placement deal

    10 February 2015

    A south Wales landlord has borrowed £50m from an institutional investor to build 600 properties over two years, increasing its stock by more than 10%.

  • A united view on universal credit

    12/12/2014

    The independence of families relies on the successful roll-out of universal credit, argues Lord David Freud

  • United House losses 'not a driver for merger'

    18 September 2014

    The new chief executive of a social housing contractor has denied that United House’s £4.5m loss was a driver for its decision to merge with Bullock Construction.

IH Subscription