Thursday, 24 May 2012

If you are a General Needs Tenant's or Leaseholders's BEWARE OF MIXED TENURE BLOCKS

Posted in: Need to Know | Ask the Experts

16/02/2012 4:27 pm

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

Anonymous

Anonymous

16/02/2012 4:35 pm

Mixed tenure blocks are almost certainly here too stay.....not only is mixed ternured considered to be good for social inclusion, but even traditional council blocks can become mixed tenure as a result of right to buy aquisition and resale. Often the leaseholders come off worst due to badly written leases.

It's a case of 'swings and roundabouts' private blocks often suffer poor, unregulated management and overcharging, plus the curse of the buy-to-let landlord. Council blocks have their own problems, amd mixed block suffer a mix of the two!

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Colemankim14

Colemankim14

Posts: 20

16/02/2012 4:51 pm

It will not let me copy and paste

so here goes

We heard at a meeting last night that the owner of our block the Freeholder employed a management agent and our Large Housing Association only have 40 sub leases

We cannot get the first management agent to adhere to our housing association financial years so we have to different Schedule of Service charges coming in

Which our large housing is being accountable under Service Charges but

the Management Agent is not and on top of the will not get the Service Provident or its Agent back to have the Estate Service Standards under Grades ahdered too

So we not getting value for money  - we cannot eliminate fraud and we cannot protected the Housing Association and Customers money

On top of that the leaseholder sinking funds is not earning interest

One case this year whereby our Housing Association can give us value for money under redecoration of Communal Area But the Management Agent cannot and given the job by the Freeholder

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Derren Cooper

Derren Cooper

Posts: 36

17/02/2012 4:37 am

I'm a little confused by the claim.

I get the question of difference in financial years, but any professional body with decent finance staff can work around that.

With regards to fraud, I'm not sure I understand the bit leading up to it, but who is it you fear may commit fraud?

As for the awarding of contracts, do you know if the HA actually applied for the contract, and why their quote was turned down?  Remember that if the contract awarded was more expensive then all the leasholders are losing out and it's in everyone's interests to kick up a fuss.

As for a sinking fund not earning interest, it's also in the interest of all leasholders to have a say in this, and they should have been aware of this before buying their leasholds.

With regards to mixed tenure, there is always going to be some discrepency between fees paid, because the leasholders pay the landlord directly, and when it comes to social tenants they pay fees to the HA who will have their contract with the landlord separately, and it might be that the HA will charge back tenants based on an estate rather than block (there are no set guidelines).

The idea though is that mixed tenure should allow social tenants to expect decent estate service because otherwise the private leaseholders are likely to move away, and the landlord loses out.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Colemankim14

Colemankim14

Posts: 20

18/02/2012 2:30 pm

Well if you a General Needs Customer or a Leaseholder whereby you landlord a Housing Association only leases the flats from the Owner and the owner has another management company involved.

The other management company charging us a service charges and our Landlord is also charging us Service Charges.  Well we can Scrutiny or landlord but we cannot Scrutiny the other Management Agent whom is not a Housing Association so is not ahdering to grades, standard under the Estate  or  has an audit trail when its Contractor come to do any work in our Communal Area or the Exterior Strucuture of the buiding.  Its getting the re-decoration programme of the communal areas when its not Value for Money and we with a Large Housing Association whom could get us Value for Money"

Well we cannot get the promise of Value for Money or protect our money by way of Service Charges by this Managment Agent that the Owner has employed

Well nothing in my Tenancy Agreement telliing me this.  We have Commercial Units breaches the term and condition but again you have the Owner again given out to another Mangement Agent would again is acting accountable 

SO DO NOT BUY A PROPERTY ABOVE A COMMERCIAL UNITS

ENSURE YOU NOT EARNING NIL O INTEREST IN YOUR SINKING FUND

SO DO NOT SIGN A TENANCY AGREEMENT THINKING ONE ORGANSATION INVOLVED AND THEY FIND YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH UNTOLD AMOUNT OF PEOPLE INVOLVED AND NONE KNOW HOW TO ACT PROFESSIONALLY

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic (5 average user rating)

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From Nic Bliss, 22/05/2012 9:28 am in Resident-led Scrutiny Reports

    There is not a right or wrong way to do Resident Scrutiny Reports.  The key issue is what will best lead to outcomes that bring improvements for tenants and prospective tenants.  If a key reason to involve tenants in involvement activities, including scrutiny exercises, is so that they can constructively challenge how the landlord operates so that services, value for money or other aspects of the business can be improved, then not allowing tenants to raise the points they wish to raise would seem to be counter productive and not using the potential business advantages that tenant involvement can ...

  • posted Anonymously, 21/05/2012 4:44 pm in What is Social Housing there for...

    Oh well, that's a surprise! I had a theoretical stab at this topic (anonymous 14/5) and it turns out that I pretty much anticipated Government policy

  • posted Anonymously, 21/05/2012 11:56 am in My Housing Officer is very unhelpful

    I had a problem with a tree... I complained for more than 12 years  to the housing officers, many of them, their managers, their directors, their complaint department of the housing trust... It was so blatant how many problems this tree created, like covering up completely a neigbours window, entirely covered my small garden, you could not stand under it because of continued pollination, it's roots making the garden uncultivable, its shoots everywhere, crows and other big birds all over it fighting and cawing... you will not believe how many times i had to write, how many experts the ...

  • From Sparkle47, 18/05/2012 10:12 pm in Rules on assignment

    Thank you both for your responce. I'm a bit worried about under occupancy, as it's a 2 bed flat, but at lest we know its all overbroad. :)

  • From Will Nixon, 17/05/2012 6:17 pm in What defines a 'living' room

    The crux of the issue is whether the property is deemed to be "more extensive" than required and the criteria will be contained in the Landlord's own policies and procedures.

  • From Shaun Aldis, 17/05/2012 11:13 am in Repairs ban

    There are a few factors to consider, which are dependent upon what is in the tenancy agreement by type of tenancy i.e. social landlord or private lease. Normally the landlord is responsible for repairs unless stated otherwise and they should be carried out within a reasonable period of time, however again unless stated there are no fixed time limits, and the length of time considered to be reasonable would depend on the type and severity of the repair.  Most landlords will normally undertake repairs once they have been notified about them, however if they refuse or fail to do ...

  • From Paul Jones, 16/05/2012 11:04 pm in Tenancy status and mutual exchanges.

    Those with lifetime (periodic) tenacies swapping with another person with the same will still swap using a "Deed of Assignment" and take over eachother's tenancies, not begin new tenancies.  BUT, if fixed-term or "affordable rent" is involved on either side, new tenancies are started. I have studied the Localism Bill and this is what it says.

  • From Blair Mcpherson, 16/05/2012 1:01 pm in Why be a tweet

    I have recently joined twitter. I was initially reluctant but my son was very enthusiastic saying it was better than Facebook because it was easier to use, wasn't restricted to your " friends" and the limit on characters keeps comments short and to the point. For me twitting is a way to promote my articles and books to let others who share my interests know what is influencing me and to pick up on what others in my areas of interest are talking about. Of course I am not immune to the temptation to follow the trend.

  • From Shaun Aldis, 16/05/2012 12:54 pm in Fire risk or not?

    Where there's any question about the performance of a product, I would suggest that it's important to get the products in question back to the manufacturer or importer, for them to inspect them and advise you as to the cause of the damage. This response can then guide and feed into your risk analysis. This should be channeled through your product supplier, be that a wholesaler, distributor, or trade supplier. My experience of this is that the quality of manufacturers responses will be improved if details about the installed conditions, fault levels, cable run distance, Amperage/kW loading, and nature ...

  • From Matt Murdock, 16/05/2012 9:42 am in London Housing Assocition not building Social Housing -WHY??

    In short the powers are devolved by government to the Mayor and, in London, the GLA will take on the role previously undertaken by the Homes and Communities Agency.