Campaigners wary of Brown's building vow
Campaigners have warned that promised investment in council-led house building must not be shackled with unwelcome conditions.
The prime minister Gordon Brown yesterday promised to ‘put aside anything’ that stands in the way of local authorities building social homes.
In a speech to a New Local Government Network conference Brown said councils would have the ‘necessary freedoms and flexibilities’ to build homes. But he added that ‘investment in social housing must be aligned with reform’.
Pressure group Defend Council Housing welcomed the announcement, but chair Alan Walter warned: ‘Any attempt to introduce means testing or time limits on council “secure” tenancies will be resisted.’
Chartered Institute of Housing chief executive Sarah Webb said Brown’s commitment is ‘great news’, although she added that the details of the plan will be key to its success.
‘We know that over the years many local authorities have lost the capacity and skills to develop new homes - they will need to work quickly to build on existing and forge new partnerships with housing associations, lenders and private house builders - time is of the essence,’ she said.
‘It is equally important that we do not lose or undermine the existing expertise and delivery of affordable housing by housing associations working with local government partners - remember this provided over 30,000 social homes last year. Ultimately what matters most is more, good quality homes being built for families - not the nature of the developer.’
The Liberal Democrats accused the prime minister of ‘dithering’. Housing spokeswoman Sarah Teather said: ‘The government must inject serious funds into social housing right away to buy up land and unsold projects while the market is low.’
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment



Word, size 50 Kb

Readers' comments (2)
Peter Girling, CEO Girlings Retirement Options | 30/01/2009 1:10 pm
What we really need to do is start freeing up the under-occupied family-home end of the property market by encouraging the over 50 empty-nesters to consider a new way of living. By encouraging our ageing homeowners to downsize from their old family homes to more suitable retirement properties, the Government would find their projected need for three and four-bedroom properties could be dramatically scaled-back.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Andy Sawford | 05/02/2009 11:18 am
We need to persuade the government on two fronts - the HRA and the PSBR. More here on how to help us
http://lgiu.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/councils-building-houses/
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment