Thursday, 02 September 2010

Christine Laird loses costs appeal

A former chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Housing has failed to overturn a costs ruling in a case against another former employer.

Christine Laird won a case brought by Cheltenham Borough Council accusing her of fraud and misrepresentation last June. The council had tried to sue her for £1 million, claiming she had lied about her health on her application for the post of managing director.

On losing the case, the council was ordered to pay 65 per cent of Mrs Laird’s legal costs, leaving her with a £280,000 bill.

In the Court of Appeal last week, Ms Laird lost her attempt to overturn the costs ruling, and will now have to pay the legal fees herself.

Her husband, Hugh Laird, said he was disappointed with the result. ‘We also feel that the outcome is unfair as we would have won if the legal rules hadn’t changed in April last year,’ he said.

‘But this result does not change the fact that Christine won the case.’

Readers' comments (3)

  • Karma anyone?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • speaking from personal experience I would have to agree with max

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Enlighten please, Karma and personal experience?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Related

Articles

  • Laird granted leave to appeal court costs

    28 September 2009

    A former Chartered Institute of Housing chief executive who won a case brought by former employer Cheltenham Council has been granted leave to appeal against her legal costs.

  • Council flaws led to £1m legal failure

    5 March 2010

    Auditors have criticised Cheltenham council for running up a £1 million legal bill in a failed attempt to sue an ex-chief executive of the Chartered Institute of Housing.

  • Weaver battle looms

    15/01/2010

    The controversy over whether housing associations are public bodies is set to drag on throughout 2010 after a new court case ducked the issue.

  • Flight of freedom

    20/11/2009

    The Tenant Services Authority’s new regulatory framework seems to set social housing providers free but are landlords having their wings clipped? Isabel Hardman finds out

  • Daughter loses succession case

    4 August 2010

    The Court of Appeal has told a woman that she cannot take over her late mother’s council property because her father lost his secure tenancy by leaving the family home.

Resources

  • Building relationships

    23/10/2009

    Landlords must heed the implications of price-fixing uncovered in the building industry

  • The right side of the law

    16/07/2010

    A new High Court case sets another human rights precedent, says Scott Greenwood

  • Last resort

    06/08/2010

    The outcome of an anti-social behaviour case brought by a tenant could see landlords default to possession orders, says Neil Brand

  • The view across the fence

    28/05/2010

    Employment tribunals are on the rise. Here two specialist lawyers in the field explain the process for both the employer and the employee

  • No strings attached

    19/02/2010

    Housing associations no longer have to mirror local authority pay rises for stock transfer staff

Latest Jobs