Kev Dupree
Recent activity
Comments (71)
-
Comment on: Concern grows over benefit cap
PSR - You state you live in London and spend £5k on commuting - i would therefore assume you work Mon-Fri around normal office hours (otherwise it would cost a lot less to commute)
If thats the case, how come the timing of your lasts posts are:
9.05 am, 9.43am, 10.55am, 10.41am, 10.48am, 12.13pm, 2.06pm, 3.01pm and 4.18pm.
Either you dont work and make a huge amount of what you say up or you do work and skive off a lot?
God forbid the oracle of socialist crap is skiving off to post on internet message boards.
I'd love to hear a response and how wrong i am and how evil my capitalist views are.
By the way PSR if capitalism didnt exist you wouldn't have a computer, or the internet, possibly a job, such a high standard of living, all the goods you buy each day.
I would care about your response more if you wern't someone who feels self important because they dont sound as stupid as the rest of the contributors. If you had anything real to say or do you wouldn't be doing it online - you would be doing it in the real world.
From reading your profile it seems you may not be in the world for too much longer so we can all turn it into the capitalist utopia which it will enevitably become. -
Comment on: Surveyors predict continuing price falls
Yet again the RICS survey provides some useless info.
Shock horror - housing market slows down over winter - just as it has since the start of time.
Melvin - i would think 20-30% predict a rise and 20-30% expect no movement
My outlook is that we will see consistant small falls over the coming year with stabilisation and possibly some small growth into 12/13, either way i cant see a return to large rises or falls anytime soon, especially with the ConDems eroding any confidence left in the financial markets.
Prices will start to rise when banks start lending again. -
Comment on: Poor areas hit by local government cuts
ALPHA: "Don't be fooled, these aren't tory cuts, they're labour cuts"
What fooled me was the tory primeminister, and chancellor, oh yes and the rest of the tory government.
I always find it amusing when people seem to agree entirely with what their particular party does/says.
Does it not seem reasonble that all parties will have some good and some bad ideas? Obviously this is the case, what is amusing is that certain people are completely blinkered in their judgement and will follow blindly whatever their party says.
Personally i voted labour (didnt we do well!) but i would never object to a policy or idea simply because it was from the tories.
Maybe this is just my naive view and the older contributors are set in their ways but i will continue to support good ideas regardless of where they come from and in tandem criticise bad ideas, again rehardless of their source.
My view on this matter is you wouldn't ask someone to pay off their mortgage in five years as it would absolutely cripple them, if you gave them 15-20 years (such as labours long term repayment plan) then this would be much less painful.
People are likley to slate this as an over-simplication but in reality no-one in this forum has the neccessary macro-economic facts and figures to put forward an accurate forecast so i thought it was worth a shot. -
Comment on: Groups united in opposition to benefit cuts
ILAG
Yep, the above was Kev Dupree's best post yet. There is hope for him yet.
I must say that dispite ILAG seemingly agreeing with me i i no way would every want to associate myself or my views with ILAG.
He has proven to be extremelly ignorant of the realities of people's lives outside his own hate filled world. He advoctaes Migration Watch and the Daily Mail as reliable sources hahahaha, Shows no empathy for fellow human beings who want to improve their lives and is so unintelligent that he cant even see how the above publications simply play on his preexisting prejudices. -
Comment on: Groups united in opposition to benefit cuts
"Mr Dupree. I don't believe it. You've managed in the space of not more than 48 hours to become a card-carrying Conservative"
Why do people become so blinkered into feeling have to align themselves with one party and agree with all their policies.
I do not support the conservatives, i do not vote consertvative, quite simply i'm open to positive ideas and oppose people who disagree simply because of the source.
I am trying to have a general debate on the philosophy towards the unemployed and worklessness.
I'd rather be defined by my opinions, not by the party you think i would support.
Discussions (0)
Kev Dupree has not added any discussions yet.
Posts (25)
-
Posted in: £95,000-a-year benefits family of 12 re-homed in a £1,000-a-week house
ILAG:
"Kev" (what a bright sounding name that is)" Thanks for the childish insult but im sorry to inform you it aint my real name Mr Ian LAG.
You seem very happy to quote figures from the OPT to back up your argument but seem to have trouble when people question your figures.
David Attenbourogh is a patron of the organisation and not an active memebr involvd in the production of such ridiculous figures.
As you have avoided the question i have posed three times i will assume you conceide that your are mistaken and have based your argument of incorrect assumptions.
I accept you apologies in advance.
-
Posted in: £95,000-a-year benefits family of 12 re-homed in a £1,000-a-week house
Well done ILAG, zero support yet again. If you approached topics with some sort of objectivity then you may be taken seriuosly.
I'll try one last time for a response:
Your previous statement would have me beleive that you think the UK is overpopulated by 45million people. Is this correct?
-
Posted in: £95,000-a-year benefits family of 12 re-homed in a £1,000-a-week house
"It might help you to understand that one of the drivers of modern economics is the idea of scarce resources and some of the early thinkers - Malthus and Keynes - thought that population was a factor in the equation"
Thanks for "helping me understand" by simply naming two famous economists. You don't seem to have made a point. Obviously population is a major factor in economics but my point is to state that the UK is overpopulated by 45million and needs to return to the population we had in 1850 is so naiive it is amazing.
-
Posted in: £95,000-a-year benefits family of 12 re-homed in a £1,000-a-week house
What a pathetically weak response:
"the source for ILAG's contribution was a site called optimumpopulation.org. or something similar. The source therefore wasn't ILAG. The views therefore were not ILAG's. Gettit."
And there was me thinking that if you post a quote from another source then you agree with it. Of course he didnt come up with it but he is obviously advocting it as correct.
"There's the small matter of May's election, not forgetting Blair's book, which have comprehensively put your views in a minority of a minority."
Where has this come from? i asked ILAG to state if he still agrees that the UK is overpopulated by 45 million and this is the response i get? Sounds a little desperate to me, also i voter tory so i don't really see your point.
Ridiculous figures, ridiculous viewpoint, no-one except an anon poster agrees, several posters disagree.
-
Posted in: £95,000-a-year benefits family of 12 re-homed in a £1,000-a-week house
I'd like to add the "remarkable similarity" is likley due to the fact you post such ridiculous views and laughable facts, i expect mine and PSRs views are representative of the vast majority.
Also thanks for the SWP explination, i haven't heard of them before, except when you try and hurl "lefty" insults. I'm still unsure who/what they are but don't really care.