Friday, 18 April 2014

Bedroom tax to be introduced before legal challenge

A legal challenge to the government’s penalty for the under-occupation of social housing will not go ahead until after the policy is introduced on 1 April.

A High Court judge set a timetable for the case yesterday, saying the court will rule on whether it can go ahead by mid-March. If it does get the go ahead then a full hearing is unlikely to take place until May.

The challenge has been brought by 10 disabled people and their families. Under the under-occupation penalty, or ‘bedroom tax’, housing benefit for working-age social housing tenants will be cut if they are deemed to have spare rooms.

Lawyers for the families involved say all 10 applicants are in danger of having their benefits reduced when the regulations, affecting some 660,000 tenants, come into force.

Their lawyers say that, unless the families move from their homes into smaller properties, they face building up rent arrears and being forced out any way.

But their disabilities mean they need to occupy either their current accommodation or housing of a similar size, and being forced to move to other accommodation will result in disadvantages they would not suffer if they were not disabled.

They want the courts to rule that the new regulations are unlawful as they ‘unjustifiably discriminate against housing benefit claimants who are disabled or care for disabled family members’.

They say the new regulations fail to take into account their circumstances, contrary to Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects against discrimination.

They also argue Iain Duncan Smith, the work and pensions secretary, has failed to comply with his public equality duty under the 2010 Equality Act.

Government lawyers are arguing the applications lack merit and should not be allowed to proceed.

The 10 applicants come from families living in the London boroughs of Hackney and Southwark and other areas including Stoke-on-Trent, Manchester and Birmingham.

Many of the disabled persons are children and cannot be named for legal reasons.

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters



  • Court asked to rule against bedroom tax

    15 May 2013

    The High Court was asked today to declare that the government’s so-called ‘bedroom tax’ unlawfully discriminates against disabled people in social housing.

  • High Court to rule on bedroom tax case

    30 July 2013

    The High Court is expected to rule on a legal challenge to the bedroom tax today, which was brought by 10 families with vulnerable and disabled children.

  • Housing groups slam bedroom tax ruling

    30 July 2013

    Housing groups and charities have been left ‘deeply disappointed’ after the High Court dismissed a legal challenge to the government’s bedroom tax.

  • A distant memory


    After being moved to tears by the poverty he witnessed on a Glasgow housing estate, he vowed things would change. But a decade later, and after implementing radical welfare reform, Iain Duncan Smith is being accused of forgetting what he saw. Lydia Stockdale reports

  • High court to rule on benefits cap 'within a month'

    4 October 2013

    The High Court will decide whether the government’s benefit cap regime breaches the human rights of the vulnerable ‘within a month’, after a legal challenge concluded today.


  • The long road to justice


    The High Court’s decision regarding the bedroom tax and disabled people is just the beginning, says Jane Plant, an associate at Weightmans

  • Unanswered questions


    Private tenants cannot be certain whether article 8 applies in possession cases, says Justin Bates, barrister at Arden Chambers

  • Rights law is an asset


    Without article 8, those in bedroom tax disputes will have an uphill struggle, says Giles Peaker, solicitor at Anthony Gold

  • The Matchmakers


    Do you have tenants who can’t pay their rent because of welfare reform? Well, speed dating might provide an unlikely solution to your problems, as Alex Turner reports

  • Keeping tenants safe


    Landlords should be aware of changes to the definition of domestic violence, says Paul Hayes, head of housing litigation and dispute resolution at Lewis Silkin