Friday, 25 May 2012

Mr P

Mr P

Recent activity

Comments (255)

View all comments

Discussions (0)

Mr P has not added any discussions yet.

Posts (29)

  • Posted in: Is it logical Captain?

    Mr P's post | 30/06/2011 11:20 am

    Chris,

    Nothing you've said is exclusive to housing or private landlords.  As you know benefit money is spent on everything, not just housing.  Is everyone from Tesco to your local market trader a vile greedy leech for selling something and making profits from taxpayers money?

    Jack,

    You truly don't know what you're talking about.

    The company i work for doesn't calculate it's profits by measuring their revenue against council rents.  This is because council rents have no bearing on the companies costs or revenues in any way, much the same as a private landlord. 

    As i said before, profits are calculated using the businesses cost and revenues, not some other unrelated businesses revenue.

     A) PSLs aren't being used over council housing, they are being used in addition to council housing.

    B) What is the alternative?  How much would it cost the tax payer to build enough social homes to house every private tenant?  More than £140 each is the answer.

    C) You can't prove anything with made up figures.  Provide some real numbers based on actual profit levels and i may agree with you.  I may not

  • Posted in: Is it logical Captain?

    Mr P's post | 29/06/2011 3:32 pm

    Jack,

    "Therefore PSL LHA rates must reflect at least a 70% profit margin for which this government is more than happy to pay."

    Profit = Revenue - costs.  How have you worked out the 70% margin without knowing any of the landlords costs?  You've just chosen a number which happens to be 70 haven't you. 

  • Posted in: Help Living In Unsuitable Bedsit With Newborn Baby!!!

    Mr P's post | 29/06/2011 12:17 pm

    Were you aware of your own housing situation prior to deciding to have a child? 

      

  • Posted in: Is it logical Captain?

    Mr P's post | 29/06/2011 10:05 am

    Chris,

    So, following your logic you want 100% benefit dependant ghettoes so the tax payers total exposure to LHA/HB is less?

  • Posted in: Council Housing is not subsidised

    Mr P's post | 14/06/2011 2:55 pm

    Semantically desperate or you don't have a decent answer?

    Unfortunately i'm still puffing away.  The clutches of capitalist consumerism are too strong.  Maybe in conjunction with the nicotine patches i should move to China or Cuba to assist with giving up. 

View all posts

About My Public Profile

This is your public profile where others can view your details and your comments, discussions and posts.

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters