Thursday, 09 February 2012

Campaigners wary of Brown's building vow

Campaigners have warned that promised investment in council-led house building must not be shackled with unwelcome conditions.

The prime minister Gordon Brown yesterday promised to ‘put aside anything’ that stands in the way of local authorities building social homes.

In a speech to a New Local Government Network conference Brown said councils would have the ‘necessary freedoms and flexibilities’ to build homes. But he added that ‘investment in social housing must be aligned with reform’.

Pressure group Defend Council Housing welcomed the announcement, but chair Alan Walter warned: ‘Any attempt to introduce means testing or time limits on council “secure” tenancies will be resisted.’

Chartered Institute of Housing chief executive Sarah Webb said Brown’s commitment is ‘great news’, although she added that the details of the plan will be key to its success.

‘We know that over the years many local authorities have lost the capacity and skills to develop new homes - they will need to work quickly to build on existing and forge new partnerships with housing associations, lenders and private house builders - time is of the essence,’ she said.

‘It is equally important that we do not lose or undermine the existing expertise and delivery of affordable housing by housing associations working with local government partners - remember this provided over 30,000 social homes last year. Ultimately what matters most is more, good quality homes being built for families - not the nature of the developer.’

The Liberal Democrats accused the prime minister of ‘dithering’. Housing spokeswoman Sarah Teather said: ‘The government must inject serious funds into social housing right away to buy up land and unsold projects while the market is low.’

Related Files

Readers' comments (2)

  • What we really need to do is start freeing up the under-occupied family-home end of the property market by encouraging the over 50 empty-nesters to consider a new way of living. By encouraging our ageing homeowners to downsize from their old family homes to more suitable retirement properties, the Government would find their projected need for three and four-bedroom properties could be dramatically scaled-back.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • We need to persuade the government on two fronts - the HRA and the PSBR. More here on how to help us

    http://lgiu.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/councils-building-houses/

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Related

Articles

Resources

  • Stuck in the mud

    16/12/2011

    Despite the Localism Act being passed, the role LEPs can play in housing remains uncertain, says Liz Jenkins, partner, and Laura Coates, trainee, at Clyde & Co

  • Welcome flexibility

    21/10/2011

    Two landlords have been named top employers for working families. Lydia Stockdale talks to one about how flexible time-keeping benefits managers and employees alike

  • Branch out via Europe

    22/07/2011

    Social landlords creating companies to run extra services must still note EU procurement rules, says Rebecca Rees, partner at Trowers & Hamlins

  • Testing times

    3 May 2011

    As the deadline passes for bids for development under the affordable rent programme, Katherine Evans examines how the planning process could hinder the new regime

  • How to...

    04/11/2011

    Social landlords can play a big role in improving the energy efficiency of the nation’s homes. But they must lobby hard to ensure ministers understand that they will need support to do so, says Martin Wheatley

Latest Jobs