Sunday, 24 July 2016

Party consulted housing figures over future of lifetime tenancies prior to the election

Tories exposed for mis-selling security

The Conservative Party held pre-election meetings with key housing figures about its plans to remove security of tenure from future social housing tenants.

This is despite the party publicly insisting that it had no plans to change tenancy arrangements for future or existing social tenants.

A senior housing source revealed that the Tories met organisations including the National Housing Federation and the Chartered Institute of Housing to discuss a number of issues including security of tenure.

The meetings took place in the run-up to May’s general election.

The source said: ‘There were discussions around security of tenure. They have since gone on the record about their plans for tenure.’

Michael Hall, co-ordinator of the Leeds Tenants’ Federation, said: ‘We feel a bit patronised that a government which claimed it would do away with the old order of things and bring in a new era of transparency has been saying one thing and doing another over something as fundamental as tenure.’

The prime minister stated last week that the government is looking at plans to issue time-limited tenancies.

Richard Capie, director of policy and practice at the CIH, said: ‘Before and during the general election CIH met housing spokespeople from across political parties to discuss the full range of housing issues that were being considered for inclusion in manifesto documents.’

Both the CIH and NHF have written to housing minister Grant Shapps since the election to call for a commission to be set up to examine reforms to social housing.

David Orr, chief executive of the NHF, said: ‘We talked about a wide range of issues with Grant Shapps before and after the election - tenure reform was one of those. Our position was and is that this is a sensitive issue on which any changes should be approached very carefully.’

Liberal Democrat deputy leader Simon Hughes said security of tenure would be a main topic at the party’s autumn conference. Its MPs have expressed strong opposition to moves to water down security of tenure before. In 2007, 37 Lib Dem MPs signed an early day motion opposing ‘proposals to means test or time-limit secure tenancies.’ Twenty-seven are still MPs.

The Conservatives declined to comment.

Readers' comments (41)

Comments are only open to subscribers of Inside Housing

Already a subscriber?

If you’re already a subscriber to Inside Housing, your subscription may not be linked to your online account. You can link your subscription from within the My Account section of the website and clicking on Link My Account.

Not yet a subscriber?

If you don't yet subscribe to Inside Housing, please visit our subscription page to view our various subscription packages.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

Related

Articles

  • Scotland to set up own social security agency

    3 March 2016

    The Scottish Government has announced plans to set up a new social security agency to manage the administration of benefits under new devolved powers.

  • Private security

    29 February 2016

    As policy shifts towards promoting homeownership, renters in the private sector still face too much uncertainty

  • Clegg: Tories blocked social housing as it produced Labour votes

    26 February 2016

    David Cameron opposed increased funding for social housing in the last parliament because it would “produce more Labour voters”, Nick Clegg has claimed.

  • Association exposed tenants to increased fire risk

    24 November 2015

    Orbit Group failed to carry out ‘high-risk’ fire safety works on hundreds of homes for more than two years, exposing a large number of tenants to increased fire risk danger.

  • 'Rent cut will not affect existing security'

    28 July 2015

    The sector’s two major valuers have agreed that George Osborne’s surprise rent cut will not affect existing loan security valuations – ending a fortnight of uncertainty for housing associations.

IH Subscription