Friday, 25 May 2012

Notice via text message

Posted in: Need to Know | Ask the Experts

20/10/2010 12:29 pm

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

Anonymous

Anonymous

23/10/2010 11:07 pm

Always refer to the tenancy agreement. It will probably say 4 weeks notice in writing.

I assume your friend is causing trouble, so they want him out? Otherwise why would they create more work for themselves in re-letting the house???

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Junior

Junior

Posts: 649

24/10/2010 2:42 pm

I suggest you go and speak to Shelter on  freephone number and please remember may take a little time to answer but will give excellent advise and help

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Cinnamon

Cinnamon

Posts: 24

25/10/2010 11:04 am

A tenant can only be removed from the property by a)them giving the appropriate notice, or b) the landlord obtains a court order.

If the tenant does not return the keys at the end of the notice period the landlord will have to apply to the courts to obtain a possession order.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Expert post

Mike Wilkins

Mike Wilkins

Posts: 39

02/11/2010 5:23 pm

Hi Alexandra,

I suspect this is one for the lawyers. Typically notice from the tenant to end the tenancy must be in writing and posted to the offices of the landlord. But only the lawyers can say if an email, or less likely, a text message, qualifies as something in writing. Probably there is case law here. Also has the landlord subsequently served notice to end the tenancy? If so is that notice in the correct form?   If the landlord has served notice, under what grounds for possession, are they mandatory etc?

Assuming the landlord has not served notice, I would have thought the text message might not be deemed as proper notice but this depends on the wording of the tenancy agreement. If it can be shown that the intent of both parties was to end the tenancy, then the landlord might have the right to expect to be able to determine the tenancy.

This all depends on relevant case law which my require a quick call to the lawyers. Alternatively if there is some doubt about the validity of the text message, it might be worth speaking to the landlord and suggesting he serve a proper notice so he avoids running the risk of prosecution in respect of illegal eviction of his tenant.

Good luck.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Expert post

Abimbola  Badejo

Abimbola Badejo

Posts: 101

03/11/2010 12:12 pm

The simple answer first. The landlord cannot have the tenant out at the end of the notice period because the landlord requires a possession order to regain possession of premises let as a dwelling.
The more difficult question is whether the notice by text is a valid notice. The Protection from Eviction Act  1977 provides that a notice to quit will not be valid unless it is in writing  and it is given not less than 4 weeks before the date that it is due to take effect. If we assume that 4 weeks notice has been given the crucial question is whether the notice by text is notice in writing to comply with the Protection from Eviction Act 1977. I think that a useful guide to answering that question will be to consider the tenancy agreement. This will usually require notice to be in writing and sent by post or delivered to the landlord's address for service. The mobile phone number will not comply with either of those requirements. Therefore it is highly likely in my view that the notice sent by text will not be a valid notice to quit unless the landlord has specified in the tenancy agreement that written notice can be demeed to be given by the tenant if sent by text. I have not seen such a clause in any tenancy agreement and I suspect that courts will be reluctant to accept that this form of terminating a tenancy is not valid on the basis that this method of service is open to abuse and possible mischief. I believe therefore that the tenant can argue that this purported of termination is inadequate in law.
The landlord may argue that even if the notice was invalid, the text message was an unequivocal offer by the tenant to give up the tenancy after the 4 week period of notice which the landlord accepted. That in law amounts to a surrender of the tenancy. For a surrender to operate to terminate the tenancy there must  in effect be an offer to surrender and an acceptance of that offer by the landlord. If the landlord has not acted in a manner consistent with the continuation of the tenancy, I suspect the landlord may have strong grounds for arguing that there has been an acceptance of the surrender of the tenancy thereby bringing the tenancy to an end. Without a full knowledge of the background  it is difficult to say much more than this. But the starting point is that the tenant should maintain that the notice to quit was simply not a valid notice and there has been no agreement by the parties to waive the invalidity.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic (5 average user rating)

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From Nic Bliss, 22/05/2012 9:28 am in Resident-led Scrutiny Reports

    There is not a right or wrong way to do Resident Scrutiny Reports.  The key issue is what will best lead to outcomes that bring improvements for tenants and prospective tenants.  If a key reason to involve tenants in involvement activities, including scrutiny exercises, is so that they can constructively challenge how the landlord operates so that services, value for money or other aspects of the business can be improved, then not allowing tenants to raise the points they wish to raise would seem to be counter productive and not using the potential business advantages that tenant involvement can ...

  • posted Anonymously, 21/05/2012 4:44 pm in What is Social Housing there for...

    Oh well, that's a surprise! I had a theoretical stab at this topic (anonymous 14/5) and it turns out that I pretty much anticipated Government policy

  • posted Anonymously, 21/05/2012 11:56 am in My Housing Officer is very unhelpful

    I had a problem with a tree... I complained for more than 12 years  to the housing officers, many of them, their managers, their directors, their complaint department of the housing trust... It was so blatant how many problems this tree created, like covering up completely a neigbours window, entirely covered my small garden, you could not stand under it because of continued pollination, it's roots making the garden uncultivable, its shoots everywhere, crows and other big birds all over it fighting and cawing... you will not believe how many times i had to write, how many experts the ...

  • From Sparkle47, 18/05/2012 10:12 pm in Rules on assignment

    Thank you both for your responce. I'm a bit worried about under occupancy, as it's a 2 bed flat, but at lest we know its all overbroad. :)

  • From Will Nixon, 17/05/2012 6:17 pm in What defines a 'living' room

    The crux of the issue is whether the property is deemed to be "more extensive" than required and the criteria will be contained in the Landlord's own policies and procedures.

  • From Shaun Aldis, 17/05/2012 11:13 am in Repairs ban

    There are a few factors to consider, which are dependent upon what is in the tenancy agreement by type of tenancy i.e. social landlord or private lease. Normally the landlord is responsible for repairs unless stated otherwise and they should be carried out within a reasonable period of time, however again unless stated there are no fixed time limits, and the length of time considered to be reasonable would depend on the type and severity of the repair.  Most landlords will normally undertake repairs once they have been notified about them, however if they refuse or fail to do ...

  • From Paul Jones, 16/05/2012 11:04 pm in Tenancy status and mutual exchanges.

    Those with lifetime (periodic) tenacies swapping with another person with the same will still swap using a "Deed of Assignment" and take over eachother's tenancies, not begin new tenancies.  BUT, if fixed-term or "affordable rent" is involved on either side, new tenancies are started. I have studied the Localism Bill and this is what it says.

  • From Blair Mcpherson, 16/05/2012 1:01 pm in Why be a tweet

    I have recently joined twitter. I was initially reluctant but my son was very enthusiastic saying it was better than Facebook because it was easier to use, wasn't restricted to your " friends" and the limit on characters keeps comments short and to the point. For me twitting is a way to promote my articles and books to let others who share my interests know what is influencing me and to pick up on what others in my areas of interest are talking about. Of course I am not immune to the temptation to follow the trend.

  • From Shaun Aldis, 16/05/2012 12:54 pm in Fire risk or not?

    Where there's any question about the performance of a product, I would suggest that it's important to get the products in question back to the manufacturer or importer, for them to inspect them and advise you as to the cause of the damage. This response can then guide and feed into your risk analysis. This should be channeled through your product supplier, be that a wholesaler, distributor, or trade supplier. My experience of this is that the quality of manufacturers responses will be improved if details about the installed conditions, fault levels, cable run distance, Amperage/kW loading, and nature ...

  • From Matt Murdock, 16/05/2012 9:42 am in London Housing Assocition not building Social Housing -WHY??

    In short the powers are devolved by government to the Mayor and, in London, the GLA will take on the role previously undertaken by the Homes and Communities Agency.