Tuesday, 29 July 2014

Proposed Right to Buy Amendments...

Posted in: Need to Know | Ask the Experts

18/01/2012 9:59 am

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

F451

F451

Location: Europe
Posts: 186

18/01/2012 10:18 am

An automatic offer to repurchase should be the first covenant attached to Right-to-Buy. This would allow the local authority a mechanism to keep the 141 pledge by the government, so long as the government does not continue to make off with the proceeds of the sales, with buy-backs.

A anti-subletting covenant would be useful in ensuring that taxpayer funds were really used to give tenants a hand up and not give a prospective buy-to-let landlord a hand out.

The tenure conversion idea, where a struggling home owner can convert to a tenancy, was one of a few positives to be thought of by Labour - but it needs greater backing and funding to make it have a real effect. However, as a mechanism to increase the availability of affordable housing there is the potential for up to 4 Million homes to be purchased and rented back under such a scheme, as this is the estimate by lenders of the numbers in mortgage difficulty currently. Now whilst the owner will be the immediate tenant, what is avoided is the owner needing to be placed by the local authority into private sector accomodation as homeless etc, or for the local authority to do what it has had to do since the Tories ensured RTB as a regressive action, and use a social let to rehouse the failed owner.

The additional bonus of course would be that by increasing the social housing stock by such a factor would restore the original flexibility and cost saving volume that once existed. This would allow truly affordable rents (saving masses from the benefit bill) and also the prospect of moving within the stock as one's housing needs change over time (reducing under and over occupancy issues).

Of course, nothing like this would ever be agreed to as it would undermine the sole objective behind each of Shapps's policies, namely the total erradication of social housing and the social exclusion of those associated with it.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Salt & Vinegar

Salt & Vinegar

Posts: 2

18/01/2012 12:58 pm

I agree with the diea for Section 141 therefore extinguishing current assured tenancies through people exercising their RTB, but then the LA getting back their stock (eventually) for social re-use.

Anti-subletting - this could not be for the life of the tenancy - it would be extended admittedly.  But otherwise could hamper the rejuvination of the housing market as eventually with RTB lettings/sales clauses expiring movement within the housing sector will increase (much like when it was first introduced) - I'm not arguing whether this is good or bad.  Just the probable thoughts of the government.

I'm assuming when the consultation ends (02/02/12) we will see the results thereafter.  I don't see the new legislation being pushed through for the start of the new financial year as they expect though.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

18/01/2012 1:47 pm

What about a RTB amnesty so all those who purchased but would now like to change their mind can revert to being tenants of the Council, including all those thousands who now are private tenants paying extortionate rents to rip-off landlords. How can an ex-council home be let out at over £1,000 per week be justified in this day and age when the neighbouring home is still be rented out by the council for £135 per week (Westminster City Council property)

If the government is so convinced that private renting is popular put it to a referrendum for private tenants, and to add spice make it a transfer ballot: Private Landlord / Council / Housing Association / Co-op. I bet that they are too scared to offer the choice.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

18/01/2012 2:49 pm

The reason Shapps does not care about the details is he knows full well that the majority of those persuaded to buy will simply be repossessed down the line and provide another cheap house for dear private rent. Why he doesnt just give his friends a blank cheque book instead.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Anonymous

Anonymous

25/01/2012 11:18 am

Scrap the right to buy and preserve houses for those who need them.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic (4 average user rating)

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From Dean Lawes , 23/07/2014 11:44 pm in succsession

    Hi this is a letter I just wrote in complaint to the council if you have a read you'll fully understand my situation.

  • From Terri Parkinson, 23/07/2014 2:48 pm in Preserved Right to Buy

    UPDATE:

  • posted Anonymously, 21/07/2014 12:29 pm in 42 Day Mutual Exchange Law!!! HELP

    It's an interesting situation because The Right to Exchange provisions of The Housing Act 1985 apply only to Secure Tenants not Asuured. I would say therefore that you might be on dodgy ground claiming deemed consnt because the landlord has not responded within 42 days although ironically your neighbour might make that argument.

  • From F451, 17/07/2014 12:54 pm in Jobs for Relatives in Housing Associations

    Now you are presenting a different case Andrew.

  • From F451, 16/07/2014 2:10 pm in Tenancy agreements social housing/housing associations

    Just one is acceptable - but which one?

  • posted Anonymously, 16/07/2014 1:43 pm in Arrears - 2 week NSP

    From my understanding,  if an NSP is issued for tenancy breaches, then the notice period is 14 days.

  • posted Anonymously, 08/07/2014 4:19 pm in Housing Association Secure tenancy into Shared Ownership - Rent Help and Advice.

    Shared Ownership rents are calculated from the general market rent.

  • posted Anonymously, 01/07/2014 1:16 pm in Weekly rent, monthly Direct Debit

    It just doesn't work, the only way you will get this to marry up is to change the charge element upon agreeing payments by DD to monthly payments.

  • From Housing Troll Returns, 30/06/2014 10:03 am in mutual exchange???

    Or perhaps of course, its been determined the other MEx partner would overcrowd a 2 bed or even there are reasons why the other partner is not being allowed to move that you cannot be told.

  • From Rose007, 28/06/2014 11:00 am in Succeeding the tenancy

    You'll find there are some experts and they are clearly marked.  You'll also find others that work within the housing field.  Just because someone works within housing doesn't mean the advice they provide is correct.  I myself work within housing and have done for some time.  With regards my comments on RTB, my brother succeeded to my mother's tenancy.  It was a 4 bed property and he lived in it with my other brother. 2 bed need.  I went to the succession appointment with him and was very surprised how unsympathetic the housing officer was.  She was adamant my ...

IH Subscription