..."Your scheme requires a little more detail and a risk assessment on all the ramifications. Marks 2/10 can do better."...
No one is damaging my position, what you are damaging is social housing if good ideas are not pushed forward.
Coming up with this idea about subletting I made it very clear in the thread that I do not have details, I made very clear that it might work on some instances, and really I made very clear this is worthwhile principle...
That housing professionals and others expect me to give the full and each detail and to sort out all the complexities of how this scheme would work and to serve it them on plate so they have all their questions answered and attacking me if they don't, it's not debate, it's plain idiocy.
These same professionals forget that all sorfts of schemes are presented by their highly paid professional colleagues working years and years on them and still come up with schemes and iniatives that make no sense. Well, I have not been working years on this idea, it just occurred to me.
It's an idea I have offered, if you like it YOU can make it work, you find the solutions and improvement to make it work and post them here.