Wednesday, 26 April 2017

Report message to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.


Tenancy for life


But Joe, the ideas have only been mooted to provoke further discussion, which in itself is no bad thing. The devil will be in the detail (as always) The points about whether means tests would be one way or the other haven't been clarified these were always only outline proposals - I can't really imagine that the change in circumstances wouldn't apply should someones position worsen. As for who would pay for it - presumably the income streams would grow considerably if certain residents are paying anything up to 50-75% more than they currently are. Personally I don't agree with the ending of the security of tenure for ANY resident, but I do believe those that are in a position to pay more, should do so as this should make the further provision of affordable housing easier to deliver.

Posted date


Posted time

9:31 am


IH Subscription