The CLG policy of destroying Sheltered Housing is not just morally repugnant and, I believe, in the case of our provider, in clear breach of the contractual terms of the transfer, it is also fiscally indefensible.
How can a policy that has already been a direct cause of avoidable suffering and death be pursued legally? How can a policy that throws away annual savings in excess of £1 billion according to figures published by its promoters CLG last year be continued? What object is being served by the CLG pretence that it is improving the service? Why are councils being forced to try to make a case for the policy by clandestine methods including partial "consultation" that does not even state the purpose and the results of which are not seen, let alone agreed, by the participants?
CLG must be stopped!