Surely if unilateral taxation is to be introduced for new social housing would hurt less people if it is achieved by cutting all CEOs salaries down to no more than £100,000 a year and charging social housing directors with a salary above £80,000 £200 pw and charging all other social housing staff with a salary above £ 40,000 £50 pw.
After all these social housing professionals would not
even have a profession or a career if tenants would not be paying their wages. So should not they give something back for once?
And this would hurt the pocket of those who can afford it without having to charge the general taxpayer.
How come when new idea is proposed by these ceos is to punish tenants either with more taxes or less security in their homes, and never themlselves?