Wednesday, 22 October 2014

Report comment to moderator

Mandatory All fields must be completed.


Benefit cut for underoccupiers 'will not save money'


Under occupation only applies to working age people so won't apply to old dears occupying their 4 bed former family home. This seems to undermine the very nature of this initiative and a cynic (PSR) may even suggest the the Conservative party are protecting a backlash against a significant proportion of their vote as well as avoiding a more serious examination of their moral conduct. A point not really raised is how in future we will develop the exact right number of properties to suit demand. We can't intentionally overcrowd and your penalised for under occupation. In some areas this could lead to some properties being empty. In addition, in the North smaller properties don't raise enough additional rent through the AR system to make them viable whereas in the South the suggestion is that developing new larger properties through AR would make them completely unaffordable once the universal credit cap kicks in. So, there you have it. If you need a big property move north, if your single move south and if your old stay put.

Posted date


Posted time

6:11 pm


IH Subscription



You will soon need to sign into using your email address rather than your username.

If you are unsure which email address is linked to your account, please Click Here. Your password will remain the same.

If you have a print subscription we need to ensure that we have the correct details in order to link your subscription to your online account, for more information Click Here.

Click Here to close window or press the Esc key.