Sunday, 23 October 2016

Legal threat over surprise plan for four councils to pilot £26k benefit cap

Councils protest at benefit cap switch

Councils being hit first by the benefits cap plan to lobby the government over fears they will be disadvantaged by the surprise move.

The government announced on 20 December that the £26,000 total household benefits cap will only apply to four councils, Haringey, Croydon, Enfield and Bromley, from 1 April and not to everywhere at the same time as widely expected. At least one, Croydon, is considering legal action to prevent the move.

Instead, the Department for Work and Pensions will phase in the transition over six months.

The four London councils - two Labour-led and two Conservative-led - are considering coming together to warn the government the move will make it more difficult and costly for them to house homeless families in temporary accommodation.

This is because other surrounding boroughs unaffected by the cap will be able to afford to place people in accommodation in the ‘capped’ boroughs, potentially leading to a shortage of suitable homes in the affected boroughs.

Ahmet Oykener, cabinet member for housing at Enfield Council, said: ‘Our homeless families will be competing in a highly competitive private rental market with residents from other London boroughs and elsewhere who will be able to pay higher rents.’ 

Mr Oykener warned addressing this could cost ‘millions of pounds’ and said the borough will lobby the government to ask the DWP for extra funding.

Croydon Council is also concerned and is considering taking legal advice about whether the decision can be challenged. Jon Rouse, chief executive of Croydon Council, this week confirmed the four boroughs are talking about how to ‘relay our concerns back to the government’.

Bromley and Haringey councils confirmed they are looking at the impact of implementing the cap.

Steve Bullock, executive member for housing at umbrella group London Councils, said: ‘There are considerable risks attached to neighbouring boroughs proceeding on different timetables and as yet this has not been taken into account.’

The four boroughs were chosen partly for administrative reasons as their benefits are all administered from a central office in Stratford.

A spokesperson for the DWP said the department is working closely with the boroughs ‘to look at the additional costs’ they may incur.

Readers' comments (12)

Comments are only open to subscribers of Inside Housing

Already a subscriber?

If you’re already a subscriber to Inside Housing, your subscription may not be linked to your online account. You can link your subscription from within the My Account section of the website and clicking on Link My Account.

Not yet a subscriber?

If you don't yet subscribe to Inside Housing, please visit our subscription page to view our various subscription packages.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up



  • DWP: Figures show benefit cap is working

    5 August 2016

    More than 23,000 people have moved off the benefit cap and into work since its introduction in 2013, according to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).

  • NFA floats switch to monthly rent collection

    15 June 2016

    The National Federation of Arm’s-Length Management Organisations (NFA) is gathering the views of its members on moving from weekly to monthly rent collection.

  • Drop in claimants hit by benefit cap

    5 May 2016

    The number of people hit by the benefit cap fell by nearly 13% between 2015 and 2016, new government figures reveal today.

  • Carers to be exempt from benefit cap

    26 January 2016

    Carers will be exempt from the £26,000 a year cap on benefits, the government has announced.

  • DWP letter follows benefit cap ruling

    27 November 2015

    The Department for Work and Pensions has issued an urgent letter to councils after the High Court ruled the existing £26,000-a-year household benefit cap unlawfully discriminates against disabed people.

IH Subscription