Wednesday, 22 October 2014

DWP to close bedroom tax loophole

The Department for Work and Pensions has pledged to close a loophole which would have inadvertently exempted long-term housing association tenants from the bedroom tax.

Regulations for the controversial policy, which will cut housing benefit for social housing tenants of working age with spare rooms, were laid before parliament last month.

The policy will see an estimated 660,000 households lose £14 a week on average.

The regulations state the bedroom tax does not apply to housing association regulated tenancies which date from before 15 January 1989.

Since 1989, housing associations have offered assured tenancies, which offer less security than regulated tenancies.

However the Department for Work Pensions says it will re-draft the regulations and take out the pre-1989 exemption. A spokesperson said the exemption was included in ‘error’.

She said: ‘These cases will not be exempted.’

Readers' comments (49)

  • Rick Campbell

    Their actions certainly say a darned sight more about the true nature of this government -- it's not exactly falling over itself to close the loopholes for the tax evaders/avoiders or reducing the financial support the MPs and Lords receive for their housing costs even though they have more than 1 home.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gavin Rider

    Rick - so the setting up of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority and the passing of the Parliamentary Standards Act doesn't count?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gavin - were you born yesterday? The IPSA etc are red-herrings designed as a sop to the gullible .... while you are looking at them and feeling smug that the politicians are personally being brought to heel,their policies are robbing every disadvantaged people group in the country blind!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick Campbell

    As I said -- they are not reducing the financial support to MPs and Lords for their housing costs like they are for ordinary folk -- they get no penalty for over-occupying like the ordinary mortals do and it is that which says more about them (i.e. "filling" their own pockets whilst "emptying" those of others!

    Of course, there;'s bound to be some who will support them in this and decry the mere mortals for protesting or not being pleased about it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gavin Rider

    Paul, Rick - I hardly think that MPs' business expenses bear any relationship to the welfare reforms that are under way, but if you want to draw parallels simply so that you can feel all puffed up and indignant at the government, go ahead.

    I would have thought the closing of the loophole was a more comment-worthy issue, myself.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Chris

    Paul, Rick - fancy calling for fairness in this age of Hood Robin - of course some will see this as just and fair, after all it is only tenants, and the poorest tenants at that who will be affected - so doubly qualified for any form of public humiliation and suffering.

    I dare not mention where it seems the inspiration behind this poilcy is coming from, suffice to say that it does not truly follow any serious biblical guidance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick Campbell

    Those in authority are filling their own pockets while gleefully taking money away from others -- as I said, that says more about the true nature of the government.

    They aren't exactly rushing to close the loopholes for the rich.

    There will be those who will see the further hurting of some of the poorest in our society as a good thing by supporting the government -- the object of the welfare reform is to make people poorer.

    To reduce the financial support of someone makes them poorer.

    Funny though --- that we're all supposed to be in this together and the rich are not, apparently.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Joe Halewood

    Just a thought does anyone know if the 42,000 or so PRIVATE regulated tenancies are covered by this same loophole?

    Or if they have been subject to the LHA restrictions since they came in in 2008?

    Did the IPSA also scrutinise the DWP impact assessments which said 20,000 will lose HB originally that last week was revised up to 40,000 - a mere 100% out?

    Did anyone scrutinise affordable rent programme that Shapps sais last month was "Affordable Rent was created at a very fast rate for the Spending Review. When we got into government we realised we had to sort out this deficit so (Affordable Rent) was a pretty rough and ready exercise in all honesty."

    Ah the joys of rough and ready scrutiny!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Rick, I completely agree, seems like the poorest are going to be even poorer. Judging by Gavin's comments though it would appear that the Government are doing a good job in "educating" people.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gavin Rider

    Joe - "Did the IPSA also scrutinise the DWP impact assessments which said 20,000 will lose HB originally that last week was revised up to 40,000 - a mere 100% out?"

    errr... did the UNCHR make any ruling on this?

    Did the WWF issue a policy statement supporting this attack on social tenants?

    NO OF COURSE NOT - it is nothing to do with them.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters



  • DWP confirms temporary bedroom tax loophole

    9 January 2014

    Thousands of social housing tenants will be temporarily exempted from the bedroom tax as a result of a ‘technical error’ in legislation.

  • Closing the loop

    10 January 2014

    The latest bedroom tax loophole is the most concrete to date, but Carl Brown believes it may still not be that significant

  • Needles in the haystack


    As long-standing tenants are declared exempt from the bedroom tax, landlords will struggle to work out who the rule applies to

  • Confusion on extent of bedroom tax loophole


    Housing experts are split over how many tenants they think could temporarily escape the bedroom tax as a result of a technical error by the Department for Work and Pensions.

  • Payback time


    The bedroom tax loophole raises tough questions for councils, says Peter Barker


  • Downsizing with the bedroom tax

    17 July 2014

    The price for underoccupying a home is high for many vulnerable people. Jess McCabe visits Stoke-on-Trent to find out how landlords are attempting to help

  • Reaching crisis point


    Tenants on the verge of eviction are being helped to remain in their homes by a recently formed social enterprise that is saving their landlords significant sums in the process. Daniel Douglas finds out how

  • Precision thinking

    15 January 2014

    Analysis of its lets, voids and tenancy lengths has allowed Adactus Housing Group to cut its planned maintenance bill by millions of pounds a year and plough the savings into developing new homes. Kate Youde finds out how

  • Fighting back


    As the private rented sector continues to grow, so does the number of problematic landlords. Michael Pooler finds out how tenants are taking matters into their own hands to fight for better conditions

  • Trade secrets


    Can learning from other sectors help social landlords do their jobs better? Heather Spurr visits retail icon John Lewis with a number of landlords to find out

IH Subscription



You will soon need to sign into using your email address rather than your username.

If you are unsure which email address is linked to your account, please Click Here. Your password will remain the same.

If you have a print subscription we need to ensure that we have the correct details in order to link your subscription to your online account, for more information Click Here.

Click here to close window