Saturday, 10 December 2016

Government urged to rethink bedroom tax

The Chartered Institute of Housing has urged the government to make concessions to its plans for a ‘bedroom tax’ after the latest Welfare Reform Bill defeat.

On Monday peers in the House of Lords voted through an amendment to the bill that would exempt some vulnerable groups from the proposals to cut housing benefit for working age social households that are deemed to be underoccupying their home.

The government has said it will overturn the amendment when the bill returns to the House of Commons. MPs have already thrown out an earlier Lords amendment that would have made households exempt from the cut if they only have one spare room or no suitable smaller homes are available.

The institute is calling on the government to review its proposals in the light of the opposition demonstrated in the House of Lords.

Under the plans working age social households in receipt of housing benefit would see their payments cut if they are deemed to be underoccupying their home. The cuts are expected to amount to 15 per cent of housing benefit for one spare bedroom, rising to 25 per cent for two.

The rules state one bedroom is allowed for each person or couple in a household. Children under the age of 15 are expected to share with one other child of the same gender, and those under the age of nine are expected to share with one other child regardless of gender.

Grainia Long, interim chief executive of the CIH, said: ‘The Lords have twice backed amendments to reform this wrong-headed measure; there is explicit support for a different approach from more than 70 organisations; and we have heard emotional illustrations of the likely unavoidable impact of these reforms on low income households up and down the country.

‘We need government to sit down again with housing professionals to take on board the reality on the ground in the design of the legislation. Only by drawing on the experience of those who provide social housing, some of which informed the Lords debate last night, will government be able to deliver a system of help with housing costs that actually works.’

Readers' comments (21)

Comments are only open to subscribers of Inside Housing

Already a subscriber?

If you’re already a subscriber to Inside Housing, your subscription may not be linked to your online account. You can link your subscription from within the My Account section of the website and clicking on Link My Account.

Not yet a subscriber?

If you don't yet subscribe to Inside Housing, please visit our subscription page to view our various subscription packages.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up



  • Government urged to delay Pay to Stay

    27 July 2016

    Councils and arm’s-length management organisations are calling on ministers to delay the introduction of Pay to Stay to avoid a ‘tight’ timetable, after the government failed to publish regulations before the parliamentary recess.

  • Arrears spike following bedroom tax

    22 July 2016

    The proportion of social housing tenants with rent arrears spiked following the introduction of the bedroom tax, new data reveals.

  • Court rules bedroom tax is unlawful

    27 January 2016

    The bedroom tax unlawfully discriminates against domestic violence victims and disabled children, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

  • Freud: Bedroom tax leads to better use of housing

    22 December 2015

    Lord David Freud has defended the bedroom tax following an official report last week that found just 8% of social tenants had downsized in response to the policy.

  • Bedroom tax tenants 'fail to downsize'

    18 December 2015

    Just 8% of tenants hit by the bedroom tax have moved to smaller properties, an official study commissioned by the government has found.

IH Subscription