Saturday, 01 November 2014

Southwark leader rules out large-scale sale of stock

The Labour leader of London’s largest local authority landlord has insisted that the council will not sell off half of its stock.

Responding to an independent report into housing in Southwark, council leader Peter John ruled out large-scale sales, saying that ‘it would go against all our beliefs’ if it followed advice to drastically reduce stock.

Southwark Council’s housing commission earlier this week outlined three ways that the council could sustain social housing beyond 2015/16. These were: to reduce the council’s current stock of 39,000 to 20,000 by 2045; to allow the stock to reduce gradually to 30,000 through right to buy and void sales; or to invest substantially in a new build programme to maintain stock at its existing level.

Mr John categorically ruled out the option to halve the stock, adding ‘it will not happen on our watch’.

He said: ‘At a time when Southwark Labour has pledged to build 1,000 new council homes by 2020, it would go against all our beliefs to reduce our stock by 20,000 in the 20 years after that.

‘By ruling this option out immediately I want to move the debate on and ensure we get to the purpose of this report which is to have a mature discussion about the future of council housing. As a council with the largest stock of council housing in London, this issue is too big and too important.’

The year-long study, headed by prominent housing lawyer Jan Luba QC and supported by think tank The Smith Institute, is expected to be seen as offering a potential blueprint for other local authorities considering the future of their housing stock.

‘I hope that other councils and the parties nationally will look at this report as it makes clear the extent of the housing time bomb this country faces,’ continued Mr John.

Earlier, opposition Liberal Democrat councillors had claimed that the report was ‘softening people up for a council home sell-off’.

Liberal Democrat spokesperson Tim McNally also questioned whether the £104,000 report was value for money, claiming ‘it doesn’t tell us a lot we don’t already know’.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Matt Murdock

    It may not tell Cllr McNally much that he doesn't know but it does tell a lot of others in the sector (and wider) what the housing situation is, the stark choices facing us and identifies the reasons why we got into this mess in the first place!

    I hope it stimulates a reasoned debate and moves away from political posturing so that real solutions can be identified.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree Matt - i just wonder how reasoned that debate can be when one option has been shelved already. Unfortuanetly, nothing is off the agenda here includign sellign stock as its clear that Southwark have issues with investing enough to maintain their current stock, let alone commit to building 1,000 new homes. The main area i hope there is a debate is around HRA and how the system can be tweaked to make sure LA's have the true freedoms they were promised.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

sign in register

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Related

Articles

Resources

  • Acting out to tackle domestic abuse

    28/03/2014

    An interactive training course is helping housing professionals in the south west identify and tackle domestic abuse. Lydia Stockdale finds out how

IH Subscription