Wednesday, 27 August 2014

The Regulatory again putting Customer on the back burned

Posted in: Need to Know | Ask the Experts

17/03/2012 10:55 am

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this discussion

Sort: Newest first | Oldest first

Author

Message

Sunflower

Sunflower

Posts: 20

17/03/2012 10:56 am

sorry spelling mistake should read BURNER

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Sunflower

Sunflower

Posts: 20

17/03/2012 11:58 am

Benchmarking Dashboard

Suppose to be the Ultimate Tenant Scrunity Tool.  WHAT IF TENANT NOT ALLOWED TO GET INVOLVED

The principal role in scrutinising landlord services and intervening where consumer standards are not met will fall to others – tenants’ panels, MPs and elected councillors.

Aside from the regulator’s backstop role in respect of consumer regulation, some of the consumer standards are changing. There will be more focus on local mechanisms to resolve complaints and disputes. The scope for new tenancy agreements needs to be reflected. There is a need for new requirements in respect of tenant mobility and the increased scope for tenant involvement in the repair and maintenance of their homes.

The regulator’s principal role will be the economic regulation of private registered providers. In large part there is continuity from the existing economic standards. The regulator will continue its commitment to the co-regulatory approach, emphasising that boards are responsible and accountable for meeting their organisation’s objectives and the regulator’s standards. And the regulator will retain its focus on the proper governance and financial viability of providers.

The regulator will also have an expanded role on value for money in private registered providers. In future, the regulator expects boards to have a clear view of their risk appetite and associated risk management strategies, an informed view of their cost base and the factors affecting it, a strategy for making best use of their assets, and a plan for improving VFM that has been developed in a transparent way with input from stakeholders. In due course the regulator’s findings on this will be reflected in regulatory judgements.

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

H4rdwork

H4rdwork

Posts: 66

19/03/2012 12:23 pm

I couldn't agree more

Unsuitable or offensive? Report this reply

Rate this topic (5 average user rating)

  • 1 star out of 5
  • 2 stars out of 5
  • 3 stars out of 5
  • 4 stars out of 5
  • 5 stars out of 5

You must be signed in to rate.

Post a Reply

You must sign in to rate this topic or make a post

sign in register

Why not register?

Registration allows you to sign up for newsletters, comment on articles, add posts in the forums, quiz our panel of experts, and save articles and jobs in the My IH section.

Register now

Newsletter Sign-up

More Newsletters

Most active members

Most recent posts

  • From TrackDay, 27/08/2014 4:47 pm in What makes some estates worthy of regeneration while a lot are being demolished?

    Hi, first question last.  Park Hill Flats was one of the first of its type to be developed in England in the early 1960s.  The back to back terraced pre 1919 houses it replaced were highly unpopular.  The vision of Streets in the Sky had not been sullied by bad mangement, poor (in some cases) construction and thermal insulation, and anti-social behaviour.  As a result the flats were very popular when they first opened, and even up until the late 1980s many of the original tenants were still living there.  Later developments of similar flats in Sheffield failed to ...

  • From Housing Troll Returns, 27/08/2014 4:26 pm in Resident Scrutiny Committee Ascham Homes

    Crikey, is this what 'Ask the Experts' has devolved into?

  • posted Anonymously, 17/08/2014 7:15 pm in Removing a joint tennant

    seek legal advice on having the tenancy transferred into your name via a property transfer order.

  • posted Anonymously, 11/08/2014 4:14 pm in Tenancy Succession - Urgent Advice

    To start a new thread click on Ask the Experts then after new page has loaded click on Start new discussion.

  • From Tulyar, 10/08/2014 11:59 am in Transport cost reductions - benefits for landlord and tenant

    Thanks

  • posted Anonymously, 04/08/2014 2:49 pm in Housing Association Secure tenancy into Shared Ownership - Rent Help and Advice.

    Thank you all for your responses - and appologies for my delay in replying. 

  • From izzit right, 04/08/2014 1:51 pm in Future of Supporting People

    Supporting People as a programme ceased last year (or was it the year before?) and the funding from central Govenment to Local authorities was pooled with other grants with no specific identity - I.E the LA got a sum of money that included the previous SP grant but were not told how much of the grant represented SP.

  • From Goldenchile, 04/08/2014 1:44 pm in Shared Owners & Involvement

    I have found this too as a SO customer. It seems you exist in this strange limbo state whereby you're not encouraged to communicate with the developers but if you call the HA and speak to the frontline staff they won't help once they know you are an SO customer.

  • From Rexroth, 04/08/2014 11:27 am in Tenants Charter ?

    Sorry should be Housing Corporation not HCA.

  • posted Anonymously, 04/08/2014 9:35 am in Landlord charging more rent in lieu of deposit

    legal - yes deposit scheme - they can either put the full amount in up front (doubtful if you havent paid it) or put an amount each month as you pay.

IH Subscription