You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
Jules BirchA rehash of David Cameron’s homeownership-at-all-costs agenda?
The shared ownership plans trailed today are likely to be just one of several measures as the government unveils gimmicks ahead of the expected election, writes Jules Birch
The first big announcement on housing since the regime change at Westminster confirms the expected change of emphasis, but it still leaves some big unanswered questions.
The emphasis is firmly on homeownership in plans widely reported this morning to make it easier for shared owners to buy an increased share in their homes.
The government will consult on plans to make it easier to staircase up by allowing them to buy an extra 1% at a time rather than the current 10%.
That may be attractive to some shared owners but it will do very little to tackle the other longstanding problems with the tenure: rising service charges, repair bills, difficulties selling – and the government will have to find a way to stop transaction costs, such as mortgage fees and surveys, making it unaffordable.
This isn’t a new idea for shared ownership – Thames Valley, now Metropolitan Thames Valley, already has a scheme called Shared Ownership Plus, which allows people to buy an extra 1% of their home each year without paying those extra costs.
However, in terms of a big idea to fix the housing crisis, it is hard to disagree with the Labour verdict that this is “tinkering”.
At the same time, the government will make it easier for people buying under Help to Buy to take out a mortgage that runs for 35 years rather than the current 25.
“It is hard to disagree with the Labour verdict that this is ‘tinkering’”
That is in line with developments elsewhere in the mortgage market and it will reduce monthly repayments but it could lead to increased prices and will cost more in the long run.
However, it seems clear that these ideas could be just the first in a series of measures aimed at boosting homeownership.
Writing in The Times this morning, housing secretary Robert Jenrick hints at more more radical plans to revive what he sees as the “moral mission” of a property-owning democracy.
Part of that could be a ‘homes for locals’ scheme:
Mr Jenrick said: “I want local young people, whether growing up in Cornwall or Cumbria, to be able to stay in their communities and build a family where they feel at home. It’s not right that people on low incomes risk being forced out, and I will be tackling this challenge head on.
“And to get Britain building, I want communities to feel that new housing brings real benefits to local people. What a difference it might make to the planning system if existing residents knew that a good proportion of new homes would be sold at discounted prices to people from that area trying to get on a foot on the ladder.”
The Times reports that ministers are considering a scheme to give first-time buyers a 20% discount to buy in the area they grew up in, with the cost to be “borne by developers”.
It sounds like a revival of David Cameron’s Starter Homes, and it will raise exactly the same issues as well as some new ones.
READ MORE
What happens to the discount? Will it remain in perpetuity or be pocketed by the first buyer?
Who really bears the costs? As things stand, the developer will simply cut its other planning contributions, making the discounted homes a cuckoo in the nest as people who need other forms of affordable housing will lose out.
And how will they decide whether someone is a local? Some people grow up in one place but many others move around a lot before their 20s and 30s.
All of these ideas sound like gimmicks that will not change very much but this is all about sending out the right signals ahead of the election that everyone assumes is coming, whether or not the government’s plan to suspend parliament until a new Queen’s Speech on 14 October goes through.
“This is all about sending out the right signals ahead of the election that everyone assumes is coming”
Preparations for an election are already underway, with departmental special advisors told to draw up plans for their sections of the next Conservative manifesto.
Therefore, it seems unlikely that the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government will use up its best (or worst) ideas at this stage.
As Inside Housing has already reported, plans could include a new part rent-part buy programme – and responses are already to call for proposals on private shared ownership.
So what price a rehash of the failed manifesto from 2015 and a lurch back to the homeownership-at-all-costs agenda of Mr Cameron and George Osborne?
First, though, there is the small matter of the Spending Review for next year that chancellor Sajid Javid has just announced will be next Wednesday (4 September).
The prospects for housing are already looking ominous ahead of that. Writing in The Telegraph, the chancellor singles out Brexit preparations, the NHS and education as his priorities but warns that spending departments cannot expect a blank cheque.
According to the Financial Times: “While the Spending Review will be billed as an ‘end to austerity’ for schools, hospitals and the police, other departments will face a continued squeeze. Housing and defence are among those likely to face a tough settlement.”
Jules Birch, award-winning blogger
