ao link
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In
Twitter
Facebook
Linked In

You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles

The Thinkhouse review: how can we unlock access for people most at risk of housing exclusion?

This month Francesca Albanese looks at reports that analyse the links between Local Housing Allowance rates and homelessness, the drivers of housing exclusion, and the role housing plays in determining in-work poverty rates

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Picture: Getty
Picture: Getty
Sharelines

Francesca Albanese discusses the drivers of housing exclusion in the latest @ThinkhouseInfo monthly review of housing research #ukhousing

This month Francesca Albanese looks at reports that analyse the links between Local Housing Allowance rates and homelessness, the drivers of housing exclusion, and the role housing plays in determining in-work poverty rates #ukhousing

The past few weeks have shown the impact of housing exclusion at its most extreme.

While emergency measures are being put in place to address the housing needs of people most exposed to risk, access to housing must move beyond temporary accommodation so that when the outbreak subsides people do not return to the streets.

The reports published on the Thinkhouse website last month draw attention to the many ways people are increasingly pushed out of the housing market and have their options restricted.

The realignment of Local Housing Allowance (LHA) to the 30th percentile has been welcomed by many people working in the housing and homelessness sector – it’s been a policy change we have long been calling for.

The Local Government Association report by Policy in Practice, Evidencing the Link Between the Local Housing Allowance Freeze and Homelessness, is a helpful resource setting out the relationship between the gaps in rent and LHA, homelessness and the associated costs to councils of people facing homelessness.

Establishing a causal link between the large gap in rents and LHA and homelessness is extremely difficult because of the interrelationship with other welfare policies, housing market pressure and financial resilience in households. It’s a conundrum that has left many researchers scratching their heads to evidence.


READ MORE

‘One size doesn’t fit all for safety – we consider each resident’s needs individually’‘One size doesn’t fit all for safety – we consider each resident’s needs individually’
Government coronavirus advice for housing providersGovernment coronavirus advice for housing providers
Helping to combat food poverty and social exclusionHelping to combat food poverty and social exclusion
How Southwark has changed its approach to domestic abuse and homelessnessHow Southwark has changed its approach to domestic abuse and homelessness

The report shows that at the point the research was carried out, the LHA was sitting at the 13th percentile of rent.

Put another way, out of 100 homes only 13 would be affordable to someone on LHA and in six local authorities all rents were above the LHA threshold.

The work shows a correlation between both numbers and proportions of households with an LHA rent gap and homelessness.

The report also models the impact of increasing rents back up to the 30th percentile and temporary accommodation use by local authorities.

Out of 100 homes only 13 would be affordable to someone on LHA and in six local authorities all rents were above the LHA threshold.

This is a model that will prove useful to return to in the coming months to understand how to track and monitor the positive aspects of increasing LHA so it is more in line with market rents.

There are many drivers of housing exclusion: structural, institutional and individual.

The second report reviewed this month is by CaCHE, Forms and Mechanisms of Exclusion in Contemporary Housing Systems: a scoping study by CaCHE, which is based on qualitative interviews, identifies a number of mechanisms driving exclusion in the English rental market.

It helpfully draws together many of the themes identified over the past 10 years, and has the overarching message that housing exclusion is worsening especially for people most exposed to risk including those on low incomes, BME groups and people facing homelessness.

Two mechanisms of exclusion identified in the report are caused by policy design.

Stakeholders spoken to as part of the research conclude that local choice-based letting (CBL) and nomination policies were viewed as being applied and interpreted inconsistently – and in some cases stopping people most in need accessing housing.

The research also highlights that welfare policy has often intentionally restricted access to certain types of housing.

Limiting housing benefit has stopped people on the lowest incomes accessing housing they can afford. Affordability is a theme throughout the report and the authors conclude: “The scarcity of social housing inevitably introduces some form of rationing, increasing competition for housing and pushing up costs in the private sector.”

Other reports this month that are worth a read include the Resolution Foundation’s Working Hard(ship) – an exploration of poverty, work and tenure, which asks the question of whether housing tenure plays a role in determining in-work poverty rates.

The study concludes that rather than due to behaviour, social renters remain exposed to in-work poverty because of the type of work they can access.

Social renters were 2.5 times as likely to work in a minimum-wage job than non-social renters.

“All the reports reviewed this month show that more can be done through policy design to open up access to housing for all”

Groundswell’s Women, Homelessness and Health is a peer-led study which looks at the inter-relationship between health and homelessness among women and their experiences of accessing healthcare.

Many of the women in the study had experienced violence that had contributed to their homelessness. The report calls for increased funding and resources for domestic and sexual violence to provide early intervention and help support women so they don’t experience homelessness in the first place.

The CaCHE report, Homeless Mothers, found that for many women, once homeless, their maternal status became invisible once they were separated from their children.

The accommodation they were offered was often unsuitable and further isolated them form support networks and schools, making it more difficult for them to rebuild their family home.

All the reports reviewed this month show that more can be done through policy design to open up access to housing for all.

The evidence points to the need for a more generous welfare system, long-term social housing investment and tailored support.

What the past few weeks have shown is these things are all achievable and we need to make sure that once the emergency planning is over attention is turned to designing a housing system that is inclusive and works for all.

Francesca Albanese, head of research and evaluation, Crisis, and editorial panel member, Thinkhouse

What is Thinkhouse?

What is Thinkhouse?

Thinkhouse was formally launched in spring 2018, and aims to “provide a single location and summary of the best and most innovative research pieces, policy publications and case studies”.

It specifically looks at reports that propose ways to boost the amount and quality of housing and the economic, social and community issues of not doing this.

The Thinkhouse editorial panel highlights the ‘must-read’ reports, blogs about them and runs the annual Early Career Researcher’s Prize.

The panel includes current and former housing association chief executives, academics, lawyers, economists and consultants. It is chaired by Richard Hyde, chief executive of a business that sells construction hand tools.

Who is on the panel?

Richard Hyde

Chair of Editorial Panel, CEO of HYDE

Gemma Duggan

Head of Compliance and Performance at Extracare

Chris Walker

Economist

Brendan Sarsfield

CEO, Peabody

Mick Laverty

CEO, Extracare Charitable Trust

Martin Wheatley

Senior Fellow, Institute for Government,

Kerri Farnsworth

Founder & MD, Kerri Farnsworth Associates

Suzanne Benson

Head of Real Estate for the Manchester office of Trowers.

Burcu Borysik

Policy Manager at Revolving Doors Agency,

Ken Gibb

Professor in housing economics at the University of Glasgow, Director of CaCHE

Peter Williams

Departmental Fellow, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge

Brian Robson

Executive Director of Policy and Public Affairs at the Northern Housing Consortium

Francesca Albanese

Head of Research and Evaluation at Crisis

Jules Birch

Journalist and blogger

Susan Emmett

Head of Engagement for Homes England

Mark Farmer

Founder and CEO Cast Consultancy

Steve Moseley

Group Director of Governance, Strategy & Communications at L&Q

Jennifer Rolison

Head of marketing at Aquila Services Group

Philip Brown

Professor of Housing and Communities at the University of Huddersfield

Anya Martin

Senior researcher at the National Housing Federation

Emily Pumford

Policy & strategy advisor, Riverside

Anthony Breach

Analyst, Centre for Cities

Shahina Begum

Customer Insight Office, Peabody

Linked InTwitterFacebookeCard
Add New Comment
You must be logged in to comment.