You are viewing 1 of your 1 free articles
The government is seeking views on whether ‘quid pro quo’ leases should be exempt from or treated differently in its proposed cap on ground rents in residential leases.
In the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill, the government is legislating to cap ground rents at £250 per year, changing to a peppercorn after 40 years.
A ‘quid pro quo’ lease is where a higher ground rent is agreed between the leaseholder and freeholder for a corresponding reduction in premium.
The government would like to hear whether there should be an exemption for these types of leases, how it should be defined and how it should work.
It is also seeking evidence from those who have agreed such a lease or have professional experience of this area.
The government explained that the ground rent cap is not intended to be an intervention in the price paid for a leasehold property itself, noting that in a genuine quid pro quo lease, the ground rent has been negotiated as part of the purchase price.
“It could therefore be seen as disproportionate to cap the rent at £250 if the lease is exempt. However, we are also conscious that if quid pro quo leases contain terms that have been shown to cause consumer harm, allowing them to continue would undermine the objectives of the ground rent cap,” it added.
In May, a cross-party group of MPs called on the government to bring forward its ground rent cap and cut the transition period in half, while creating an independent regulator for property management agents.
The recommendations came as part of the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee’s probe into the draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill.
A major proposal is asking the government to go further in its legislation by creating an independent regulator for property management agents.
Alongside this, the proposed £250 ground rent cap, currently coming into force in 2028, should be brought forward by a year.
The committee also questioned the government’s evidence base for the proposed 40-year transitional period to zero ground rent, and believes a shorter transitional period of 20 years would be a fairer balance between leaseholders, freeholders and institutional investors.
The report also expresses concern that several vital recommendations previously made by the Law Commission are entirely missing from the draft bill.
The report states these measures, which the government’s manifesto promised to enact, would make it easier and more affordable for existing leaseholders to convert to commonhold.
Sign up to Inside Housing’s Regulation and Legal newsletter, featuring a weekly bulletin with news and insight on regulation, key legal rulings, legislation and court cases.
Already have an account? Click here to manage your newsletters.
Related stories